I'm already getting beaten down by the Romo vs. Luck talk. In a practical sense what does it matter? Let me give it to the critics, let me say yes Andrew Luck is a better QB than Romo is. Let's even say he wasn't just better this year but he's guaranteed to be a better QB than Romo every season from here on out. Let's say that's just truth and it can't be changed.
Now what?
Andrew Luck was rated as the best QB prospect the NFL draft has seen since Peyton Manning. Not only was he the 1st pick of the draft he's a 1-every-10-years draft pick.
So if you cut Romo you're not going to find Andrew Luck sitting at the 18th pick of this year's draft. You won't find him with the 1st overall pick of this year's draft. There was no Andrew Luck in the 2010 draft, there was no Andrew Luck in the 2011 draft, there is no Andrew Luck in the 2013 draft, and there will not be an Andrew Luck in the 2014 draft.
So if Luck is better than Romo it doesn't matter. Cutting Romo doesn't get you Andrew Luck.