Major 5G companies are flipping switches on soon

[VaqueroTD]

It is affecting our airplanes. It interferes with the radio altimeter, which causes all sorts of issues.

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-59737194

Thanks for the link. Definitely makes me feel safer. *gulp*

They need to listen to the airline industry. Airline industry doesn’t have anything to gain from their opposition other than safer pilots and passengers.

 

[DoctorChicken]

technology is like sugar more of it will kill you

Well, considering because of technology the average human lifespan has increased drastically in the last century, I think I'll disagree with you there.

 

[CouchCoach]

Do not, I repeat, DO NOT use the regular foil hats when this happens, get the heavy duty and double it. Makes the hat look cooler as well and the chicks will dig that.

 

[jrumann59]

Is it 5G 5G or is the 4.5G that companies are saying is 5G. From my understanding most 5g is rather short range line of sight from the towers and 5G equipment is rather small so it blends in in urban environments because you will need said line of sight.

 

[dsturgeon]

Well, considering because of technology the average human lifespan has increased drastically in the last century, I think I'll disagree with you there.

what technology in the last century has drastically increased the human lifespan?

 

[dsturgeon]

The only possibility of skin damage from phones comes from the batteries, not from the radio frequency. Radio waves are all around you all day, every day. The phones only translate them into information you can understand.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701402/

1. Focus actions for reducing exposure to RFR on pregnant women, infants, children and adolescents, as well as males who might wish to become fathers.
   
   
2. Reduce, as much as possible, the extent to which infants and young children are exposed to RFR from Wi-Fi-enabled devices such as baby monitors, wearable devices, cell phones, tablets, etc.
   
   
3. Avoid placing cell towers and small cell antennae close to schools and homes pending further research and revision of the existing exposure limits. In schools, homes and the workplace, cable or optical fiber connections to the Internet are preferred. Wi-Fi routers in schools and daycares/kindergartens should be strongly discouraged and programs instituted to provide Internet access via cable or fiber.
   
   
4. Ensure that WTDs minimize radiation by transmitting only when necessary, and as infrequently as is feasible. Examples include transmitting only in response to a signal (e.g., accessing a router or querying a device, a cordless phone handset being turned on, or voice or motion activation). Prominent, visible power switches are needed to ensure that WTDs can be easily turned on only when needed, and off when not required (e.g., Wi-Fi when sleeping).
   
   
5. Lower permitted power densities in close proximity to fixed-site antennae, from “occupational” limits to exposure limits for the general public.
   
   
6. Update current exposure limits to be protective against the non-thermal effects of RFR. Such action should be taken by all heath ministries and public health agencies, as well as industry regulatory bodies. Exposure limits should be based on measurements of RFR levels related to biological effects (2).
   
   
7. Ensure that advisories relating to cell phone use are placed in such a way that purchasers can find them easily, similar to the Berkeley Cell Phone “Right to Know” Ordinance (86).
   
   
8. Advise the public that texting and speaker mode are preferable to holding cell phones to the ear. Alternatively, use hands-free accessories for cell phones, including air tube headsets that interrupt the transmission of RFR.
   
   
9. When possible, keep cell phones away from the body (e.g., on a nearby desk, in a purse or bag, or on a mounted hands-free accessory in motor vehicles).
   
   
10. Delay the widespread implementation of 5G (and any other new technology) until studies can be conducted to assess safety. This includes a wide range of household and community-wide infrastructure WTDs and self-driving vehicles, as well as the building of 5G minicells.
    
    
11. Fiber-optic connections for the Internet should be made available to every home, office, school, warehouse and factory, when and where possible.
    

 

[Runwildboys]

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701402/

1. Focus actions for reducing exposure to RFR on pregnant women, infants, children and adolescents, as well as males who might wish to become fathers.
   
   
2. Reduce, as much as possible, the extent to which infants and young children are exposed to RFR from Wi-Fi-enabled devices such as baby monitors, wearable devices, cell phones, tablets, etc.
   
   
3. Avoid placing cell towers and small cell antennae close to schools and homes pending further research and revision of the existing exposure limits. In schools, homes and the workplace, cable or optical fiber connections to the Internet are preferred. Wi-Fi routers in schools and daycares/kindergartens should be strongly discouraged and programs instituted to provide Internet access via cable or fiber.
   
   
4. Ensure that WTDs minimize radiation by transmitting only when necessary, and as infrequently as is feasible. Examples include transmitting only in response to a signal (e.g., accessing a router or querying a device, a cordless phone handset being turned on, or voice or motion activation). Prominent, visible power switches are needed to ensure that WTDs can be easily turned on only when needed, and off when not required (e.g., Wi-Fi when sleeping).
   
   
5. Lower permitted power densities in close proximity to fixed-site antennae, from “occupational” limits to exposure limits for the general public.
   
   
6. Update current exposure limits to be protective against the non-thermal effects of RFR. Such action should be taken by all heath ministries and public health agencies, as well as industry regulatory bodies. Exposure limits should be based on measurements of RFR levels related to biological effects (2).
   
   
7. Ensure that advisories relating to cell phone use are placed in such a way that purchasers can find them easily, similar to the Berkeley Cell Phone “Right to Know” Ordinance (86).
   
   
8. Advise the public that texting and speaker mode are preferable to holding cell phones to the ear. Alternatively, use hands-free accessories for cell phones, including air tube headsets that interrupt the transmission of RFR.
   
   
9. When possible, keep cell phones away from the body (e.g., on a nearby desk, in a purse or bag, or on a mounted hands-free accessory in motor vehicles).
   
   
10. Delay the widespread implementation of 5G (and any other new technology) until studies can be conducted to assess safety. This includes a wide range of household and community-wide infrastructure WTDs and self-driving vehicles, as well as the building of 5G minicells.
    
    
11. Fiber-optic connections for the Internet should be made available to every home, office, school, warehouse and factory, when and where possible.

All this is the government covering their collective butts because they aren't sure. Look at #10 for proof.

Do you know a single person who's been irradiated by their phone?

 

[dsturgeon]

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580522/#B79

current disease out there and 5g, something to think about. I am not going to link anything due to getting the post removed

See how it goes after jan 19th

 

[dsturgeon]

All this is the government covering their collective butts because they aren't sure. Look at #10 for proof.

5g is not a requirement for the negative effects

and these are only studies I posted because they were .gov. there are tons of credible studies all over the world covering all types of RFR

 

[dsturgeon]

tin foil hat > experiment on my body dunce cap

 

[dsturgeon]

All this is the government covering their collective butts because they aren't sure. Look at #10 for proof.

Do you know a single person who's been irradiated by their phone?

https://www.niehs.nih.gov/news/newsroom/releases/2018/november1/index.cfm

“A major strength of our studies is that we were able to control exactly how much radio frequency radiation the animals received — something that’s not possible when studying human cell phone use, which has often relied on questionnaires,” said Michael Wyde, Ph.D., lead toxicologist on the studies.

 

[dsturgeon]

You can find studies supporting damage and no damage. I simply go by, in no way does exposure to any of it strengthen your body, therefore it is weakening it.

But disregarding it as tin foil hat is foolish. Always look to the money and technology

Just turning off all wifi and electronics around you makes you sleep better. All those waves we can not see effect the body. A simple experiment everyone can do

 

[HungryLion]

what technology in the last century has drastically increased the human lifespan?

Ill provide an example right now.

My dad was recently diagnosed with prostate cancer. This type of cancer. About 20 years ago the expected life span was 1-5 years.


After meeting with two oncologists. They now with modern treatments, including radiation, his life expectancy is 15+ years with the same cancer.

the surgery they are going to do soon is also robot assisted surgery. Better surgeries. With robots making cleaner cuts which allow them to get more of the cancer out safely and with shorter recovery times for patients.


In the field of medicine. Better technology has helped them make huge strides in treating different conditions.


Doesn’t mean all technology is good. Some technology has drawbacks and negatives too. I hear ya.

but some of it has been very beneficial.

 

[HungryLion]

https://www.niehs.nih.gov/news/newsroom/releases/2018/november1/index.cfm

“A major strength of our studies is that we were able to control exactly how much radio frequency radiation the animals received — something that’s not possible when studying human cell phone use, which has often relied on questionnaires,” said Michael Wyde, Ph.D., lead toxicologist on the studies.

My bigger concern is chemicals to be honest.



the tons and tons and tons of industrial chemicals being dumped into our rivers and streams, into the ground. All the crap we burn into our air all over the world all day long every single day.


I think that stuff is way more harmful than the possible risks from cell phone radiation.

 

[dsturgeon]

Ill provide an example right now.

My dad was recently diagnosed with prostate cancer. This type of cancer. About 20 years ago the expected life span was 1-5 years.


After meeting with two oncologists. They now with modern treatments, including radiation, his life expectancy is 15+ years with the same cancer.

the surgery they are going to do soon is also robot assisted surgery. Better surgeries. With robots making cleaner cuts which allow them to get more of the cancer out safely and with shorter recovery times for patients.

That is good. I hope your dad has good quality of life for however long he makes it

I am not arguing things, I could make a list of stuff too. But I wonder about the which came first chicken or the egg scenario. A lot of the things people died from a long time ago were fixed with sanitation and plumbing, which you could label as technology too.

We have created and introduced a lot of the stuff that is causing cancer and other current diseases which we are now creating technology to overcome, then comparing that to life spans long ago.

I am not sure of my point I am making, but i was curious what he was referring to as a drastic change.

 

[HungryLion]

That is good. I hope your dad has good quality of life for however long he makes it

I am not arguing things, I could make a list of stuff too. But I wonder about the which came first chicken or the egg scenario. A lot of the things people died from a long time ago were fixed with sanitation and plumbing, which you could label as technology too.

We have created and introduced a lot of the stuff that is causing cancer and other current diseases which we are now creating technology to overcome, then comparing that to life spans long ago.

I am not sure of my point I am making, but i was curious what he was referring to as a drastic change.

I hear what you are saying. Which I mentioned in my post about pollution. We do create some problems with our technology, industrialization and then have to solve those new problems as well.

 

[dsturgeon]

My bigger concern is chemicals to be honest.



the tons and tons and tons of industrial chemicals being dumped into our rivers and streams, into the ground. All the crap we burn into our air all over the world all day long every single day.


I think that stuff is way more harmful than the possible risks from cell phone radiation.

It is a multi faceted assault we are under. Pretty much even aspect of life.

I watched a show called mountain men, and there was a quote I liked. He said, "organic food, or as our grandparents called it, food" The fact that there is food that is not organic doesn't make sense. And organic is not even that good, besides it being non gmo. We are exposed to chemicals, consume them, radiated with them, fluoridated in the water, etc. etc

 

[HungryLion]

It is a multi faceted assault we are under. Pretty much even aspect of life.

I watched a show called mountain men, and there was a quote I liked. He said, "organic food, or as our grandparents called it, food" The fact that there is food that is not organic doesn't make sense. And organic is not even that good, besides it being non gmo. We are exposed to chemicals, consume them, radiated with them, fluoridated in the water, etc. etc

We have come a long way from my great grandparents who lived on a farm all their life and grew their own food, had their own chickens, pigs, etc and produced all their own food.

that’s for sure.

 

[dsturgeon]

We have come a long way from my great grandparents who lived on a farm all their life and grew their own food, had their own chickens, pigs, etc and produced all their own food.

that’s for sure.

I mention the route I drive earlier in this thread. Yesterday I was on the road when the sun came up. As soon as I could see the sky there were about 11 planes I counted on my left spraying the sky. I did about a 4 hour route just watching them spraying, and the last town i was in on that route which is the town next to mine it looked like a battle had taken place in the sky (at least 10 different planes, I couldnt count them all because of the 30 or so white streams covering the sky) . Then I watched it all dissipate and form a solid layer of fake clouds. Today I wake up and in every direction it is a solid and thick weird looking cloud that covers everything I can see in all directions.

It was a completely clear blue beautiful sky yesterday when the sun came up and I saw the planes.

I have been watching this for years, over and over, and when I talk to people about it, they look at me like I am crazy.

People take samples of rain water they collect, have it tested, and it has aluminum and barium in it

Now geoengineering is admitted to, but people don't get it. Raining that stuff down in the soil, blocking the sun, putting metal in people, making the atmosphere more conductive, whatever it is doing or all of it, I dont know

I found out about German doctor Franz Mesmer and his work with metals in the bodies and mesmerization and hypnotism. It is interesting stuff. I am not saying they are related or how effective it was, but it is something to think about

 

[The Fonz]

Well, considering because of technology the average human lifespan has increased drastically in the last century, I think I'll disagree with you there.

you have a point however the harm will be way more than the good just wait and observe