To act like he wasn't part of the ongoing problem with the team is laughable. He deserves no apology what so ever.in title, yet he was pretty mich relegated to DO coach, he wasn't even calling the defense the past 2 years. everybody knows that.
Just heard on 105 3 the fan RJ choppy quote a stat that said the Cowboys pass rush win rate what's 53% which ranked number one in the league. For those who adore Analytics and stats, by this Marinelli may be owed an apology.
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id...s-rushing-rankings-2019-pbwr-prwr-leaderboard
so you're not an analytics guy? or any stat guy, because if you are you can't pick and choose what stats you want to use as an indicator of results.
Just heard on 105 3 the fan RJ choppy quote a stat that said the Cowboys pass rush win rate what's 53% which ranked number one in the league. For those who adore Analytics and stats, by this Marinelli may be owed an apology.
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id...s-rushing-rankings-2019-pbwr-prwr-leaderboard
Lol you do know, that Rod didn't call the plays on the defensive side of the ball, right? Right!?and Marinelli was the Defensive Coordinator, so all of it falls on his shoulders.
To act like he wasn't part of the ongoing problem with the team is laughable. He deserves no apology what so ever.
Just another example of how stats can be misleading.
It’s the hallmark of a Garrett team. I think it would be quite difficult to lead the league in pass rush win rate and be 19th in sacks. Yet, Jason Garrett is always up for such a challenge.What good is being #1 in a stat like that if you're #19 in sacks?
Please explain your thought process as what does this mean if the defense failed as a whole? How does he deserve an apology for failing. Hell even a broken clock is right twice a day!
Yeah, as they were probably #1 in.....almost got there, but you eluded me and completed the pass anyway....
I don't mind stats at all. I just wouldn't base my decisions on stats alone because I know they can be misleading. Or be used to mislead. Someone else mentioned run defense. If our run defense isn't very good, what difference does that pass rush stat make? We had the most vanilla defense I've seen in a long time, why would I apologize to a DC that I didn't think was any good? Because of one stat? What were the results?
No. He was here and apart of the debacle that was bringing in himself and his mentor Monti Koffin. He stayed on and he continued to be part of the problem on defense. I agree and have said everyone was part of the issues with this team. But to pretend like the vitriol he received was not dating back to the Kiffin debacle is disingenuous. Because it has everything to do with before he was demoted to just dlc.everybody was a part of the problem, that's what team football is about. the offense was top 5 offense , but they still was a part of the problem. it's a team game. but the vitriol that man receives is highly exaggerated
So true......especially passing stats when you get to play against the 8 worst defenses in the league....some of them twice in the same season
Just heard on 105 3 the fan RJ choppy quote a stat that said the Cowboys pass rush win rate what's 53% which ranked number one in the league. For those who adore Analytics and stats, by this Marinelli may be owed an apology.
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id...s-rushing-rankings-2019-pbwr-prwr-leaderboard
his unit the DL(which he was pretty much relegated to) through his scheme rushing the passer, which gets killed here was #1 in the league.
Just heard on 105 3 the fan RJ choppy quote a stat that said the Cowboys pass rush win rate what's 53% which ranked number one in the league. For those who adore Analytics and stats, by this Marinelli may be owed an apology.
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id...s-rushing-rankings-2019-pbwr-prwr-leaderboard
I somewhat agree with your stat angle, but there are some things you can't see with the naked eye, therefore you have to rely on stats.