Aven8;4413852 said:This means we will get him in the 2nd and sell the fans that we got a 1st rounder for a 2nd, but he won't see the field until Romo and Ware are giving there retirement speeches. No thank you. We have enough injured players, we need players that can come in and play day one and contribute.
supercowboy8;4413860 said:no thanks, I wouldn't take him in the 5th. We don't need a inbox zone SS. We need someone that can roam the field and has great speed to make plays.
George Iloka or Markelle Martin are my two favorite safties in this weak safety class.
I say fix all our needs in FA and the draft this year but for safety. Resign Elam or get Mike Adams for one more year. Then next year do all you can for Bcarri Rambo or TJ McDonald.
realtick;4413908 said:Lol, Martin is just as bad as Barron in coverage.
Zimmy Lives;4413949 said:Barron may not be an elite cover guy but he tackles well, he can stay with most TEs and he is a leader on the field. He is a 1st round talent so if he's still available in the 2nd round he would be worth the 45 pick.
realtick;4413972 said:No need to tell me, I like Barron. Not at #14, but I would consider him later if the right opportunity presented itself.
Barron is a playmaker:
235 tackles
13 TFL
5.0 sacks
12 INT
34 passes defensed
For comparison, here's Markelle Martin's numbers (4-years too):
179 tackles
8 TFL
0 sacks
3 INT
39 passes defensed
Zimmy Lives;4413949 said:Barron may not be an elite cover guy but he tackles well, he can stay with most TEs and he is a leader on the field. He is a 1st round talent so if he's still available in the 2nd round he would be worth the 45 pick.
TheCount;4413976 said:I don't know, I'm not particularly interested in another 2nd round pick that will red shirt his first year. Unlike most, I happen to like Barron and don't think a SS has to be able to cover a WR one on one to be considered worth drafting, but the injury is a concern.
TheCount;4413976 said:I don't know, I'm not particularly interested in another 2nd round pick that will red shirt his first year. Unlike most, I happen to like Barron and don't think a SS has to be able to cover a WR one on one to be considered worth drafting, but the injury is a concern.
no he's not, he's bad but not as bad as Barronrealtick;4413908 said:Lol, Martin is just as bad as Barron in coverage.
realtick;4413972 said:No need to tell me, I like Barron. Not at #14, but I would consider him later if the right opportunity presented itself.
Barron is a playmaker:
235 tackles
13 TFL
5.0 sacks
12 INT
34 passes defensed
For comparison, here's Markelle Martin's numbers (4-years too):
179 tackles
8 TFL
0 sacks
3 INT
39 passes defensed
Zimmy Lives;4413949 said:Barron may not be an elite cover guy but he tackles well, he can stay with most TEs and he is a leader on the field. He is a 1st round talent so if he's still available in the 2nd round he would be worth the 45 pick.
cobra;4414001 said:Prediction: Barron will never let himself be timed running 40 or the cone drills.
supercowboy8;4413999 said:so you want another RW31, a guy that cant cover a TE but can hit.
No thanks
realtick;4413907 said:Bet you're pretty pissed-off about Sean Lee.
