Honestly, I didn't think it was a good call initially, but after watching the re-play it's definitely a block in the back.Bleu Star;3554907 said:Was that block in the back call really a block in the back??? Does anyone have video of that? It seemed legal to me and they didn't spend much time debating the call which pissed me off. That was one of many momentum changers...
Section444;3554918 said:Honestly, I didn't think it was a good call initially, but after watching the re-play it's definitely a block in the back.
WoodysGirl;3554942 said:It was definitely a block in the back. He totally wiped that guy out. lol
He apologized for it on twitter.
WoodysGirl;3554942 said:It was definitely a block in the back. He totally wiped that guy out. lol
He apologized for it on twitter.
Boyzmamacita;3554916 said:I don't know if that block really impacted the play. It looked like Austin was going to get around that guy anyway.
So him flying forward like that didn't seem like Bennett wiped him out?Bob Sacamano;3554944 said:He didn't wipe him out. The defender was lunging towards Dez anyways as Bennett was going for his back.
Any worse than Barron?casmith07;3555029 said:It was a good call.
Bennett for RT though?
casmith07;3555029 said:It was a good call.
Bennett for RT though?
You and me both. Bennett may be a bum thus far as a pass catcher, but the guy can block.Bleu Star;3555037 said:I have zero doubt that Bennett > Barron at Barron's position.
WoodysGirl;3554965 said:So him flying forward like that didn't seem like Bennett wiped him out?
It was a block in the back regardless of my description.
