math and logic question

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
if it takes 7 people, 2 days to do a job

how many people would it take to do that job in half a day?

7 x 12?
 

DragonCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,498
Reaction score
250
JerryAdvocate;2792981 said:
if it takes 7 people, 2 days to do a job

how many people would it take to do that job in half a day?

7 x 12?

If it takes 7 people 2 days to do the job, assuming all people are the same, it would take 14 people to do it in 1 day. So, it should take 28 people to do it in half a day...assuming that it's physically possible to do the job in half a day.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
DragonCowboy;2792989 said:
If it takes 7 people 2 days to do the job, assuming all people are the same, it would take 14 people to do it in 1 day. So, it should take 28 people to do it in half a day...assuming that it's physically possible to do the job in half a day.

I was ****ing WAY off
as you can see, math is not my strong-suit, I sucked doing proofs in Geometry

YEAG, shut up
 

ScipioCowboy

More than meets the eye.
Messages
25,266
Reaction score
17,597
JerryAdvocate;2792981 said:
if it takes 7 people, 2 days to do a job

how many people would it take to do that job in half a day?

7 x 12?

28 people?
 

Achozen

Sounds From The Lair
Messages
5,083
Reaction score
11
JerryAdvocate;2792981 said:
if it takes 7 people, 2 days to do a job

how many people would it take to do that job in half a day?

7 x 12?
snoop.gif
 

Apollo Creed

Stackin and Processin, Well
Messages
9,027
Reaction score
1,223
JerryAdvocate;2792981 said:
if it takes 7 people, 2 days to do a job

how many people would it take to do that job in half a day?

7 x 12?

1.75 people.
 

masomenos

Less is more
Messages
5,983
Reaction score
33
Just for future reference Bob, this is how you can figure a problem like this out, regardless of the time or the amount of people.

You have the variables of # of people and of time, set to equal 1 job.

So, your basic equation looks like this:

(# people)(time) = 1 job

or

(P)(T) = J

In the problem, you are given a P and a T value.

(7)(2) = J
(7)(2) = 14

Now, since you know the "value" of a completed job, any further combination of variables must equal 14.

In the second part of the problem you are given only one of the variables, amount of time.

(P)(.5) = 14
(28)(.5) = 14
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
masomenos85;2793246 said:
Just for future reference Bob, this is how you can figure a problem like this out, regardless of the time or the amount of people.

You have the variables of # of people and of time, set to equal 1 job.

So, your basic equation looks like this:

(# people)(time) = 1 job

or

(P)(T) = J

In the problem, you are given a P and a T value.

(7)(2) = J
(7)(2) = 14

Now, since you know the "value" of a completed job, any further combination of variables must equal 14.

In the second part of the problem you are given only one of the variables, amount of time.

(P)(.5) = 14
(28)(.5) = 14
What, no accounting for efficiencies arising from economies of scale and division of labor?
 

masomenos

Less is more
Messages
5,983
Reaction score
33
theogt;2793247 said:
What, no accounting for efficiencies arising from economies of scale and division of labor?

I just assumed a Marxist society where labor divisions would be set up for maximum efficiency. Much like the government retooling of our auto-industry...or something.
 

kmp77

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,309
Reaction score
396
JerryAdvocate;2792981 said:
if it takes 7 people, 2 days to do a job

how many people would it take to do that job in half a day?

7 x 12?

1/2 a day is a 1/4 of 2 days.....so 4 is the multiplier. 4 x 7 = 28?
 

Kevinicus

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,886
Reaction score
12,670
SLATEmosphere;2793347 said:
Whaaaat? LOL..If it took 7 people to finish a job in 2 days it would take LESS people to finish it in shorter time?:laugh2:

Well...if the extra workers were from the government...
 

Kangaroo

Active Member
Messages
9,893
Reaction score
1
JerryAdvocate;2792994 said:
I was ****ing WAY off
as you can see, math is not my strong-suit, I sucked doing proofs in Geometry

YEAG, shut up

Thats funny I struggled at proofs and geometry and breezed through Algebra I & II and I remember more of my stupid geometry :eek: and have used my Geometry more often.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
The real question is how many CowboysZone forum posters would it take to do that same job in 2 days?

I'm not sure of the answer, but I do know that if Yeager is part of the work force, you have a one week penalty right off the bat. :laugh2:
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Kangaroo;2793904 said:
Thats funny I struggled at proofs and geometry and breezed through Algebra I & II and I remember more of my stupid geometry :eek: and have used my Geometry more often.

Unlikely. You would be surprised how often people use Algebra everyday without even noticing it.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
Kangaroo;2793904 said:
Thats funny I struggled at proofs and geometry and breezed through Algebra I & II and I remember more of my stupid geometry :eek: and have used my Geometry more often.

I aced trig, even had my math teacher persuade me to take AP Calculus

but for the life of me I was stumped trying to get through proofs, I think I eeked out a D in Geometry

nyc;2794602 said:
The real question is how many CowboysZone forum posters would it take to do that same job in 2 days?

I'm not sure of the answer, but I do know that if Yeager is part of the work force, you have a one week penalty right off the bat. :laugh2:
:lmao2: so true
 
Top