Bob Sacamano
Benched
- Messages
- 57,084
- Reaction score
- 3
if it takes 7 people, 2 days to do a job
how many people would it take to do that job in half a day?
7 x 12?
how many people would it take to do that job in half a day?
7 x 12?
JerryAdvocate;2792981 said:if it takes 7 people, 2 days to do a job
how many people would it take to do that job in half a day?
7 x 12?
DragonCowboy;2792989 said:If it takes 7 people 2 days to do the job, assuming all people are the same, it would take 14 people to do it in 1 day. So, it should take 28 people to do it in half a day...assuming that it's physically possible to do the job in half a day.
JerryAdvocate;2792981 said:if it takes 7 people, 2 days to do a job
how many people would it take to do that job in half a day?
7 x 12?
JerryAdvocate;2792981 said:if it takes 7 people, 2 days to do a job
how many people would it take to do that job in half a day?
7 x 12?
Achozen;2793003 said:
JerryAdvocate;2792981 said:if it takes 7 people, 2 days to do a job
how many people would it take to do that job in half a day?
7 x 12?
What, no accounting for efficiencies arising from economies of scale and division of labor?masomenos85;2793246 said:Just for future reference Bob, this is how you can figure a problem like this out, regardless of the time or the amount of people.
You have the variables of # of people and of time, set to equal 1 job.
So, your basic equation looks like this:
(# people)(time) = 1 job
or
(P)(T) = J
In the problem, you are given a P and a T value.
(7)(2) = J
(7)(2) = 14
Now, since you know the "value" of a completed job, any further combination of variables must equal 14.
In the second part of the problem you are given only one of the variables, amount of time.
(P)(.5) = 14
(28)(.5) = 14
theogt;2793247 said:What, no accounting for efficiencies arising from economies of scale and division of labor?
JerryAdvocate;2792981 said:if it takes 7 people, 2 days to do a job
how many people would it take to do that job in half a day?
7 x 12?
More or less correct.JerryAdvocate;2793267 said:thanks mason
Apollo Creed;2793214 said:1.75 people.
SLATEmosphere;2793347 said:Whaaaat? LOL..If it took 7 people to finish a job in 2 days it would take LESS people to finish it in shorter time?:laugh2:
JerryAdvocate;2792994 said:I was ****ing WAY off
as you can see, math is not my strong-suit, I sucked doing proofs in Geometry
YEAG, shut up
Kangaroo;2793904 said:Thats funny I struggled at proofs and geometry and breezed through Algebra I & II and I remember more of my stupid geometry and have used my Geometry more often.
Kangaroo;2793904 said:Thats funny I struggled at proofs and geometry and breezed through Algebra I & II and I remember more of my stupid geometry and have used my Geometry more often.
so truenyc;2794602 said:The real question is how many CowboysZone forum posters would it take to do that same job in 2 days?
I'm not sure of the answer, but I do know that if Yeager is part of the work force, you have a one week penalty right off the bat. :laugh2: