Matt Flynn as Backup

rooler

Benched
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Citing league sources, ESPN's Adam Schefter reports that the Packers are "unlikely" to place the franchise tag on impending free agent Matt Flynn.


The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel and SI's Peter King had previously suggested that franchising Flynn would at least be a consideration for the Packers, in an effort to pull a sign-and-trade deal. Instead,

Green Bay's franchise tag figures to be used on Jermichael Finley.

This would make Flynn easier for teams like the Seahawks and Commanders to acquire. He isn't going to cost a draft pick

Jim Robinson knows the kid

only 26
 
why would he come here to be a backup when Washington, Seattle, and Cleveland are going to offer him a starting job.
 
He is going to get big money to start somewhere next year.
 
supercowboy8;4378933 said:
why would he come here to be a backup when Washington, Seattle, and Cleveland are going to offer him a starting job.

well who knows maybe Romo gets hurt again

what he has been hurt two years in a row ?

I was just throwing that info out there
 
rooler;4378973 said:
well who knows maybe Romo gets hurt again

what he has been hurt two years in a row ?

I was just throwing that info out there

Doesn't matter, unless Romo suffers a major injury between now and the beginning of March. There will be a bidding war between teams who want him to be the starter. We wouldn't pay him starter money to be the back up, and he wouldn't come here knowing he would be the back up.
 
Despite the crazy stats, I'm not seeing a top QB in Flynn. I was disappointed once I actually saw the Detroit game. He's kind of a lumbering player. He'd die behind our OL.

He's Kevin Kolb. Let Washington sign him and continue to suck.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,691
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top