burmafrd said:I think he will be gone by our pick in the 2nd. You are right in that he is a LA clone - but he has quickness that LA lost years ago.
K-Mart said:some mocks have him going late in the 2nd. Guards normally aren't a high priority on peoples wish list...... if he is available i think we would be crazy not to take him.
Paniolo22 said:I wouldn't mind any of the top 4 guards in the 2nd or 3rd. Giles, Spencer, Joseph, or Lutui. If we get ONE of them, I think our guard depth would be significantly improved. I just hope Jerry doesn't pull a loser out of Nowhere State in the 3rd round to be the "Guard of the Future". Hopefully Ireland has his sights set on the real playahs.
ROYDESTROY said:They had no luck with big school guys either see Peterman and Rogers (LSU-SCal) so like you say hopefully Ireland is the difference maker this year.
Paniolo22 said:This years Oline class is MUCH stronger than the Peterman/Rogers class. Hell, Peterman was considered the 3rd best guard that year, and Rogers was either 2nd or 3rd best tackle. Much deeper this year.
K-Mart said:Hasn't been much talk about him that I have seen and could step in as our starting LG. He is the 2nd coming of LA and could have a very nice impact on our team. Most mocks I've seen..... he should be around in the 2nd. I wouldn't mind it one bit.
burmafrd said:Most scout services have him and spencer 1 & 2 at guard. I think he will be gone by the 49th pick. Most of the mocks I have seen have him going either late 1st or early second.
ROYDESTROY said:They had no luck with big school guys either see Peterman and Rogers (LSU-SCal) so like you say hopefully Ireland is the difference maker this year.
I think we are writing him off because Parcells didn't trust him to switch from left to right guard. When you are inside, it's not a difficult concept. I'm hoping he does better, but it's going to be year 3, and youj know what Landry said about year 3 players.FuzzyLumpkins said:I wouldnt writw off Peterman so quickly. He played well last preseason.
The only basis you have for writing him off was that he didnt play at RG last season. Gurode started instead at RG and he actually has experience and practice at RG whereas Peterman has been at LG the whole time.
I feel that keeping Peterman at LG only is a good move as he learns the NFL game and could benefit him coming into this season.
bbgun said:The whole point of replacing Allen is finding a guy who can kick out on sweeps and screen plays. That ain't Gilles.
FuzzyLumpkins said:I wouldnt writw off Peterman so quickly. He played well last preseason.
The only basis you have for writing him off was that he didnt play at RG last season. Gurode started instead at RG and he actually has experience and practice at RG whereas Peterman has been at LG the whole time.
I feel that keeping Peterman at LG only is a good move as he learns the NFL game and could benefit him coming into this season.
Paniolo22 said:I think we are writing him off because Parcells didn't trust him to switch from left to right guard. When you are inside, it's not a difficult concept. I'm hoping he does better, but it's going to be year 3, and youj know what Landry said about year 3 players.