Maybe we could've had Brown, Burleson $49 mill

VThokie7

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,065
Reaction score
506
Seahawks sign WR Burleson to seven-year deal
By Len Pasquarelli
ESPN.com

Seeking another playmaker for their already potent offense, and looking for a little payback as well, the Seattle Seahawks on Friday evening signed Minnesota Vikings wide receiver Nate Burleson to a restricted free agent offer sheet worth $49 million over seven years.

Nate Burleson
Wide Receiver
Minnesota Vikings

Profile
2005 SEASON STATISTICS
Rec Yds TD Avg Long YAC
30 328 1 10.9 20 59

Do those contract terms sound a little familiar? They should. The Vikings earlier this week spirited three-time Pro Bowl guard Steve Hutchinson, designated by Seattle as a transition free agent, away from the Seahawks with a seven-year, $49 million deal. Seattle declined to match the offer, and Hutchinson moved on to the Vikings, after the Seahawks lost an arbitration case in which they challenged some so-called "poison pill" provisions of the offer sheet.

There have been rumors for about a week that Burleson, who recently visited with Seahawks officials, might sign a Seattle offer sheet. But the added element of revenge -- and there is little doubt the similarity to the Hutchinson contract was more than coincidental -- certainly provides a delicious twist.

It should be interesting to see how top officials from the two franchises interact when the annual league meetings convene in Orlando, Fla., on Monday morning. The weather in Orlando for next week already is forecast as cool, and the relationship between the Vikings and Seahawks is a bit chillier after Friday.

The offer sheet that Burleson signed on Friday with the Seahawks features not only the same number of years and the same amount of total payout as the Hutchinson contract, but also includes two "poison pills" that will make it virtually impossible for the Vikings to match.

Minnesota has seven days to match the offer sheet, keep Burleson, and essentially inherit the terms of the contract negotiated by the Seahawks with the three-year veteran wide receiver. If the Vikings decline to match, they will receive Seattle's third-round choice in this year's draft as compensation. The Vikings retained a right of first refusal on Burleson by making him a restricted free agent qualifying offer of $712,000 earlier this month.

To match the deal, though, the Vikings will have to swallow hard. Beyond the size of the total payout and a total of $5.25 million in guarantees, are two devious provisions.

The first would guarantee the entire contract, all $49 million, if Burleson plays five or more games in the state of Minnesota in any season of the contract. The Vikings, of course, play home games in Minneapolis, at the Metrodome there. The second bizarre provision would guarantee the full contract if Burleson is paid more on average per year than all of the Minnesota running backs combined. At least for now, the averages of the Vikings' tailbacks fall well shy of the $7 million average of the Burleson offer sheet.

It should be recalled that, when the Vikings signed Hutchinson to his offer sheet, they wrote into the deal a provision that guaranteed the full contract if the star guard was not the highest paid lineman on the team. The Vikings knew that Seattle could not match the offer, since Pro Bowl left tackle Walter Jones has a contract that averages more than Hutchinson's deal.

Before deciding whether to match the offer sheet, Minnesota officials may challenge the "poison pill" provisions, as did the Seahawks with Hutchinson's contract. Minnesota likely could have avoided the raid on Burleson had the Vikings, who possessed more than enough salary cap space, made him a higher qualifying offer, one that carried a loftier price tag in terms of compensatory picks.

By choosing to tender Burleson's lowest-level qualifying offer, the Vikings made him as easy target for teams to poach, given that it would cost them just a third-round draft choice as compensation. At that price, Burleson was one of the real steals of the restricted free agent talent pool, and Seattle, appropriately, attempted to pilfer the talented wideout.

In three seasons, Burleson has 127 receptions for 1,789 yards and 12 touchdowns. The former Nevada star, a third-round pick in the 2003 draft, has appeared in 47 games and started 33 of them. He had a seeming breakout year in 2004, when he posted 68 catches for 1,006 yards and nine touchdowns, but his numbers dropped off in 2005, when injuries limited Burleson to nine starts.

Around the NFL, however, Burleson, just 24, is regarded as an ascending talent, a wide receiver capable of 70 or more catches annually and of consistent 1,000-yard seasons.

Were the Seahawks to secure Burleson, who played at O'Dea High School in Seattle, he probably would join Darrell Jackson in the starting lineup. That would allow veteran Bobby Engram, a starter in 2005, to return to his more natural role as the No. 3 receiver working out of the slot.

Len Pasquarelli is a senior NFL writer for ESPN.com.

WOW a WR who didn't do squat last year gets 49 million and we thought the Commanders were bad. The poison pill provisions are pretty funny though
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
VThokie7 said:
WOW a WR who didn't do squat last year gets 49 million and we thought the Commanders were bad. The poison pill provisions are pretty funny though


It would be 49 million if Minnesota matches the offer. For seattle it's essentially a 3 year 14 million dollar contract.


The poison pills only effect it if he plays in Minnesota. In the end, it's a solid deal for the Seahawks, a horrible deal for the Viqueens if they match.
 

VThokie7

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,065
Reaction score
506
Rack said:
It would be 49 million if Minnesota matches the offer. For seattle it's essentially a 3 year 14 million dollar contract.


The poison pills only effect it if he plays in Minnesota. In the end, it's a solid deal for the Seahawks, a horrible deal for the Viqueens if they match.

You have to love the poison pills they threw in there. 3 years 14 million seems a bit much for Burleson plus a 3rd, but I guess it feels good sticking it back to the Vikings. But you have to figure if they cared about bringing him back they would've tendered him at a 1st round level.
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
VThokie7 said:
You have to love the poison pills they threw in there. 3 years 14 million seems a bit much for Burleson plus a 3rd, but I guess it feels good sticking it back to the Vikings. But you have to figure if they cared about bringing him back they would've tendered him at a 1st round level.


Yeah I love that Seattle is giving Minnesota a taste of their own medicine. :D


It may have been 5 years, 14 million. I read it somewhere, don't remember where though.

The third isn't that big a deal since it's a very late third. Burleson was hurt last year so his numbers dipped, but he was a 1000 yard WR in 2004.


I kind of hope Minnesota matches just to watch them screw themselves over. :D
 

VThokie7

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,065
Reaction score
506
Rack said:
Yeah I love that Seattle is giving Minnesota a taste of their own medicine. :D


It may have been 5 years, 14 million. I read it somewhere, don't remember where though.

The third isn't that big a deal since it's a very late third. Burleson was hurt last year so his numbers dipped, but he was a 1000 yard WR in 2004.


I kind of hope Minnesota matches just to watch them screw themselves over. :D


Hopefully the NFL steps up to put an end to these rediculous poison pill provisions for next off season. If not the Vikings sure opened a pandoras box for the future
 

Zaxor

Virtus Mille Scuta
Messages
8,406
Reaction score
38
VThokie7 said:
Hopefully the NFL steps up to put an end to these rediculous poison pill provisions for next off season. If not the Vikings sure opened a pandoras box for the future

Are you kidding...I think its great fun and forces these cheap teams to step up
 

VThokie7

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,065
Reaction score
506
Zaxor said:
Are you kidding...I think its great fun and forces these cheap teams to step up

Forces cheap teams to step up? With the wording of the Poison Pills the Seahawks for instance would have guarenteed Hutchinson 49 MILLION!!! If he got a career ender after year one, thats a 42 million cap hit. Even the richest of teams can't afford that. The Poison Pills do not effect cheap teams, they just make it impossible to match PERIOD. Which as a result makes transition tags and restricted free agency a joke (outside of the fact you get compensated a pick)
 

Zaxor

Virtus Mille Scuta
Messages
8,406
Reaction score
38
VThokie7 said:
Forces cheap teams to step up? With the wording of the Poison Pills the Seahawks for instance would have guarenteed Hutchinson 49 MILLION!!! If he got a career ender after year one, thats a 42 million cap hit. Even the richest of teams can't afford that. The Poison Pills do not effect cheap teams, they just make it impossible to match PERIOD. Which as a result makes transition tags and restricted free agency a joke (outside of the fact you get compensated a pick)

By cheap teams stepping up I mean that they lock up the players (with decent contracts)before they get to FA
 

VThokie7

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,065
Reaction score
506
Zaxor said:
By cheap teams stepping up I mean that they lock up the players (with decent contracts)before they get to FA

That isn't always in their hands, the Seahawks tried offering him a 6 million a year deal prior to tagging him. At that time it would've been the largest contract ever awarded to a guard. So they certainly weren't being cheap. And after the money the Hawks have paid to Winstrom, Hasselbach, Alexander, Walter Jones, and now Peterson I certainly wouldn't classify them as a cheap team. Players want to see the market some times and won't resign until they do. So with that in mind the poison pills are something that should be taken out after this season
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
VThokie7 said:
That isn't always in their hands, the Seahawks tried offering him a 6 million a year deal prior to tagging him. At that time it would've been the largest contract ever awarded to a guard.

Larry Allen's contract was for $6.991 million.
 

Zaxor

Virtus Mille Scuta
Messages
8,406
Reaction score
38
VThokie7 said:
That isn't always in their hands, the Seahawks tried offering him a 6 million a year deal prior to tagging him. At that time it would've been the largest contract ever awarded to a guard. So they certainly weren't being cheap. And after the money the Hawks have paid to Winstrom, Hasselbach, Alexander, Walter Jones, and now Peterson I certainly wouldn't classify them as a cheap team. Players want to see the market some times and won't resign until they do. So with that in mind the poison pills are something that should be taken out after this season

Again I disagree...If a player wants to stay with his team and the team wants him...they will find a way to make it happen... but if the guy wants out the poison pill is an excellent option
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
The NFL might end up drawing the line on what can be included in an offer sheet, but teams should realize that if they don't want to lose a player, they should tender him at a higher level or re-sign him themselves before he hits the open market.

The Vikings, by the way, probably don't mind getting a third-round pick out of Burleson. They have four other receivers who are as good or better.
 

Zaxor

Virtus Mille Scuta
Messages
8,406
Reaction score
38
AdamJT13 said:
The NFL might end up drawing the line on what can be included in an offer sheet, but teams should realize that if they don't want to lose a player, they should tender him at a higher level or re-sign him themselves before he hits the open market.

The Vikings, by the way, probably don't mind getting a third-round pick out of Burleson. They have four other receivers who are as good or better.
absolutely Adam and well said
 

SupermanXx

Benched
Messages
4,009
Reaction score
0
can someone please explain to me just what in the HELL "poison pill" provisions are????
 

TruBlueCowboy

New Member
Messages
7,301
Reaction score
0
A third-rate receiver for one of the best offensive linemen in the league. You show 'em Seattle!
 

Pokes28

Member
Messages
365
Reaction score
0
A poison pill means that if the team does match there are contract provisions that make it much more difficult for the team that has matching rights than the team that signed him to the offer sheet.

For example in the Hutchinson deal that the Vikings signed, they promised he'd be the highest paid OL on the team in 2006 or his entire contract would be guaranteed. Well, Seattle has a guy on the line making more money in 2006 than Hutch would have, so for the Vikings it isn't a guaranteed contract but for the Hawks it is. That is a poison pill.

However, I was of the understanding that a contract couldn't actually increase the salary of a player for one team over another under current rules.

This will be interesting.

David Harrell - Pokes
dwh
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
Pokes28 said:
However, I was of the understanding that a contract couldn't actually increase the salary of a player for one team over another under current rules.

None of the poison pills used by Seattle or Minnesota would change the player's salary. They simply guarantee the contract, which is permitted.
 
Top