Media Conspiracy???

[ReturnToGlory]

Why is the Harrison non-touchdown being swept under the rug nor the other numerous calls that went against the Cards?

 

[Billy Bullocks]

Harrison scored. There is no way you can over turn the play based on the visual evidence.

It looked like the refs were going to job Arizona when they handed out 3 personal foul calls in one drive, capping it off by giving Pitt a new set out of downs inside the 10.

But I really felt that the holding in the end zone call showed that it was pretty even.

The most questionable call I felt was the end of the game. No review. Nothing? As far as I understand, it should have been an INCOMPLETE pass. IN addition, Arizona should have gotten 15 more yards for the personal foul.
Now I'm not saying that Zona would have scored. But you gotta at least give em a shot from the 35yard line with 7 seconds left.

 

[tomson75]

 

[bbgun]

Um, to drive you crazy?

P.S. How many times are you going to post the same thread?

 

[BrAinPaiNt]

It's amazing that we are not all bald, because we sure do get enough threads/posts here to make us scratch our heads around here.

 

[BrAinPaiNt]

Um, to drive you crazy?

P.S. How many times are you going to post the same thread?

He will keep it up until he...Returns to Glory.

veal anyone?

 

[Clove]

It's over my friend, they are champions.

 

[Beast_from_East]

Why is the Harrison non-touchdown being swept under the rug nor the other numerous calls that went against the Cards?

Because it is the Stealers!!!!!

 

[Vintage]

Best Guess: Probably because the Harrison non-touchdown was in fact, actually a touchdown.


Surprising, I know. Other players other than Dallas Cowboys can in fact, and are allowed to, score touchdowns in a legal manner.

 

[bbgun]

Best Guess: Probably because the Harrison non-touchdown was in fact, actually a touchdown.

Surprising, I know. Other players other than Dallas Cowboys can in fact, and are allowed to, score touchdowns in a legal manner.

Dear Vintage,

You have received an infraction at Dallas Cowboys Forums - CowboysZone.com.

http://cowboyszone.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2618056&postcount=9

Reason: Posting something sensible in a reality-free thread

 

[Vintage]

Dear Vintage,

You have received an infraction at Dallas Cowboys Forums - CowboysZone.com.

http://cowboyszone.com/forums/showthread.php?p=2618065&posted=1#post2618065

Reason: Posting something sensible in a reality-free thread

Crap.

Now I have to call WG and be all like "bbgun gave me a warning. Pls come over and help!!!!!"

 

[daschoo]

Best Guess: Probably because the Harrison non-touchdown was in fact, actually a touchdown.


Surprising, I know. Other players other than Dallas Cowboys can in fact, and are allowed to, score touchdowns in a legal manner.

that my friend is genius!!!!

 

[dcfanatic]

Why is the Harrison non-touchdown being swept under the rug nor the other numerous calls that went against the Cards?

Just because you are so annoying.

Who tackled Harrison on this 'non-TD'?

Larry Fitzgerald.

Let me explain something to you.

Fitz was running up the sideline so far out of bounds that he actually ran into Antrel Rolle at about the 30 yard line, lol.

Guess what? Rolle didn't have a helmet on because he plays defense!

Fitz then continued to run OUT OF BOUNDS before he finally reached Harrison at the goalline. When he jumped on him his feet were still out of bounds, lol.

[youtube]HebjyhlU-_s[/youtube]

He isn't allowed to do that. The rule states that he has to re-establish himself back on the field of play before making the tackle.

And just for clarification. The ball clearly crossed the goalline way before the first part of his body, his head, actually touched the field.

Now stop embarrassing yourself.

 

[Wrangler87]

I didn't get the non review at the end either. I couldn't believe it when I saw Pittsburgh snap the ball to take a knee. Just amazing that they didn't even look at that.

 

[AdamJT13]

He isn't allowed to do that. The rule states that he has to re-establish himself back on the field of play before making the tackle.

There is no such rule.

 

[dcfanatic]

There is no such rule.

I thought the rule was that you have to try to get back on the field and you can't run up the sideline out of bounds?

 

[BigDFan5]

I thought the rule was that you have to try to get back on the field and you can't run up the sideline out of bounds?

on kick returns

 

[dcfanatic]

on kick returns

I thought it was on any return because of the change of possession.

Anyone got a rule book?

 

[thisisepic]

Yeah i am pretty sure you have to establish yourself in bounds before being the first to make any football related act.

 

[AdamJT13]

Anyone got a rule book?

http://www.ianwhetstone.com/football/2008NFLRuleBook.pdf