Michael Beasley

Heigth doesn't matter much.

Standing reach > Heigth

But even then, Beasley's standing reach wasn't all that impressive. It was adequate. His skill set is impressive. Handles, his shot, range, rebounding. Take you off the dribble, can post you up.

His skill set > Rose's.

Rose though, doesn't have the character concerns, signs of immaturity that Beasley has. Rose is also considered to have good size for his position; whereas Beasley is undersized.

Both excellent prospects.

He'll make a nice pick for Miami.
 
Since Beasley played just down the road I've heard plenty about him. We all knew he wasn't 6' 10" tall. That isn't news around here.

If I were a pro team I wouldn't be as concerned about his character as much as the simple fact he is an *******.
 
big dog cowboy;2121589 said:
Since Beasley played just down the road I've heard plenty about him. We all knew he wasn't 6' 10" tall. That isn't news around here.

If I were a pro team I wouldn't be as concerned about his character as much as the simple fact he is an *******.


I dunno. I think he comes off as a goofball of sorts in interviews. I think he is probably a little immature, but then again, he is 19.
 
beasley should go to the bulls not the heat. Bulls already have a PG don't need another one.
 
They've been dangling Gordon around quite a bit in recent trade talks. I dont really thing Hinrich is a true PG
 
Rampage;2126434 said:
i just heard on tv today he shrunk again and is 6'7 now.
Lets see what the graphics say Thursday night. I don't know his true height but I know he isn't 6'10".
 
Back
Top