Mike Jenkins?

CaptainMorgan

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,109
Reaction score
586
Im sorry havent been around much for the preseason but I noticed it said Olando Skandrick statred at nickle back. Is something up with Mike Jenkins? Did he see any playing time?
 

Real1st

Nikola Tesla
Messages
6,060
Reaction score
1,599
I tried to tell yall Scandrick was better than Jenkins and he was going to start over Jenkins. LOL

Naw all jokes aside i don't think Jenkins is the ideal slot corner. Maybe that is why.
 

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,652
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Per Calvin Watkins chat

Tabaco: Why did we see Orlando Scandrick in the game and not Mike Jenkins?

Calvin Watkins: They both played, Scandrick was put in the game first because he covers wide receivers in the slot and Jenkins doesn't. That happened pretty quick on Sunday.
 

DCBoysfan

Hardwork and Dedication
Messages
7,279
Reaction score
3,583
Jenkins took over for Henry, when Henry moved to Winslow.
 

Real1st

Nikola Tesla
Messages
6,060
Reaction score
1,599
I honestly didn't notice Jenkins was on the field alot.
 

CaptainMorgan

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,109
Reaction score
586
Thanks guys. So Im guessing Jenkins and Skandrick did a pretty solid job out there looking at the numbers.
 

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,652
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I LOVE ME SOME ME!;2245118 said:
But we did notice Scandrick. I told you to wait until week 1 started.;)

j/k
Truthfully, it's not always a good thing for a cornerback's name to be called.

So the fact that we didn't hear Jenkins name doesn't mean he didn't perform. It almost sounds like he did, especially if he wasn't credited for any catches.

I realize Scandrick was challenged a bit more, so that's why his name was called.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
WoodysGirl;2245127 said:
Truthfully, it's not always a good thing for a cornerback's name to be called.

So the fact that we didn't hear Jenkins name doesn't mean he didn't perform. It almost sounds like he did, especially if he wasn't credited for any catches.

I realize Scandrick was challenged a bit more, so that's why his name was called.

I agree just the fact that this unit held Anderson to under 200 passing (114 yards) to be exact says a lot about the play of the defense and the secondary
 
Messages
882
Reaction score
0
WoodysGirl;2245127 said:
Truthfully, it's not always a good thing for a cornerback's name to be called.

So the fact that we didn't hear Jenkins name doesn't mean he didn't perform. It almost sounds like he did, especially if he wasn't credited for any catches.

I realize Scandrick was challenged a bit more, so that's why his name was called.



Nah. I was poking fun at him because i recall him saying Scandrick was better than Jenkins in preseason. I told him to wait until week 1 started before he judged the two and so far by default Jenkins played better.

But it doesn't matter anyway because they are both better than Reeves and Jones.
 

Real1st

Nikola Tesla
Messages
6,060
Reaction score
1,599
WoodysGirl;2245127 said:
Truthfully, it's not always a good thing for a cornerback's name to be called.

So the fact that we didn't hear Jenkins name doesn't mean he didn't perform. It almost sounds like he did, if he wasn't credited for any catches.

I realize Scandrick was challenged a bit more, so that's why his name was called.

I really don't care who gets more playing time or who is better.

Im just glad we have depth at the CB position this year.

Jenkins must of played a good game in coverage because i didn't hear his name.

Scandrick had some decent plays but a couple where he showed his inexperience but he didn't get torched or abused.

So im real encouraged about our secondary in the years to come
 

2much2soon

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,514
Reaction score
89
I noticed several plays where Dallas should of had coverage sacks. Anderson ran around and couldn't find anybody to throw to.
It was an impressive performance by the new look secondary. Glad to see Scandrick step up and show what he can do.
Would of liked to see the defense get a few more sacks with the great coverage from the secondary. That was the only thing disappointing in the whole thing to me.
 

dargonking999

DKRandom
Messages
12,578
Reaction score
2,057
Jenkins is the backup to Henry, Pacman is the backup to Newman. But scandrick is our backup slot corner. Which is why we saw him first. It didn't help that he gave up a few catches, and was called for a couple of stupid penalties.
 

2much2soon

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,514
Reaction score
89
dargonking999;2245213 said:
Jenkins is the backup to Henry, Pacman is the backup to Newman. But scandrick is our backup slot corner. Which is why we saw him first. It didn't help that he gave up a few catches, and was called for a couple of stupid penalties.

Wow, a rookie playing his first NFL game. Tough room.
Have you already forgotten Jacques Reeves and Nate Jones?
 
Messages
882
Reaction score
0
2much2soon;2245235 said:
Wow, a rookie playing his first NFL game. Tough room.
Have you already forgotten Jacques Reeves and Nate Jones?



They get paid what they do for a reason. No excuses
 

dargonking999

DKRandom
Messages
12,578
Reaction score
2,057
2much2soon;2245235 said:
Wow, a rookie playing his first NFL game. Tough room.
Have you already forgotten Jacques Reeves and Nate Jones?

I'm reporting what i saw, and why we heard his name. I never said he played bad. He gave up a few catches, and made a stupid penalty. Truth hurts oh well.
 

xtreme_2k

Well-Known Member
Messages
262
Reaction score
299
CaptainMorgan;2245083 said:
Im sorry havent been around much for the preseason but I noticed it said Olando Skandrick statred at nickle back. Is something up with Mike Jenkins? Did he see any playing time?

Jenkins came in to take up Henry's spot on the Dime packages, while Henry took up the slot.
 
Top