EndGame;3068700 said:
This is the important part of what you said. Do you mean to tell me that it wouldn't be a big story to ESPN if Jon Kitna came out and said he wasn't happy with his role in Dallas? Puleeze!
First, you don't know if it would be a lead story. And if you say you know it would be, then I'll ask you to prove it.
Second, I don't think it would because there's nothing unusual for a backup saying he's unhappy in his role. Who cares about a backup? That's why he's a backup, because he's not starting. Duh.
Third, you separated her "lead story" statement from her other, more significant, point.
She said it wasn't a lead story. But even so, of course, it would likely be given greater play if it involved the Cowboys. The Cowboys are a more glamorous, more interesting franchise than the Eagles. More people love and hate the Cowboys than the Eagles. So, of course, it would be given greater play, although who knows if it would be a lead story.
In short, stop whining about the situation. Because of their immense popularity, the Cowboys are going to get more media exposure - good or bad.
Now deal with it.
