Twitter: MM on Schultz and Parsons calling out teammates, lots of frustration

How is conflict good? If anything this is a sign of locker room issues and an impending implosion.

Also, there’s always some sort of “conflict” in the locker room, which I find funny because it never amounts to anything. Most of the time when you hear “conflict” a team is angry and comes out to play. I can count on one hand how many times the Cowboys have done that. Just a joke of a team all around.


Edit: MM and Schultz are some of the last people on the locker room that need to be calling people out. Only person that can call out others last night is the RB core and Diggs. Everyone else needs to shut up and get themselves and their clown mentality together.
 
MysteryIceGuro said:
How is conflict good? If anything this is a sign of locker room issues and an impending implosion.

Also, there’s always some sort of “conflict” in the locker room, which I find funny because it never amounts to anything. Most of the time when you hear “conflict” a team is angry and comes out to play. I can count on one hand how many times the Cowboys have done that. Just a joke of a team all around.


Edit: MM and Schultz are some of the last people on the locker room that need to be calling people out. Only person that can call out others last night is the RB core and Diggs. Everyone else needs to shut up and get themselves and their clown mentality together.
Click to expand...

you clearly don’t get it
 
MysteryIceGuro said:
How is conflict good? If anything this is a sign of locker room issues and an impending implosion.

Also, there’s always some sort of “conflict” in the locker room, which I find funny because it never amounts to anything. Most of the time when you hear “conflict” a team is angry and comes out to play. I can count on one hand how many times the Cowboys have done that. Just a joke of a team all around.


Edit: MM and Schultz are some of the last people on the locker room that need to be calling people out. Only person that can call out others last night is the RB core and Diggs. Everyone else needs to shut up and get themselves and their clown mentality together.
Click to expand...
healthy conflict is good.
 


Oh yea?
MysteryIceGuro said:
How is conflict good? If anything this is a sign of locker room issues and an impending implosion.

Also, there’s always some sort of “conflict” in the locker room, which I find funny because it never amounts to anything. Most of the time when you hear “conflict” a team is angry and comes out to play. I can count on one hand how many times the Cowboys have done that. Just a joke of a team all around.


Edit: MM and Schultz are some of the last people on the locker room that need to be calling people out. Only person that can call out others last night is the RB core and Diggs. Everyone else needs to shut up and get themselves and their clown mentality together.
Click to expand...
 
MysteryIceGuro said:
How is conflict good? If anything this is a sign of locker room issues and an impending implosion.

Also, there’s always some sort of “conflict” in the locker room, which I find funny because it never amounts to anything. Most of the time when you hear “conflict” a team is angry and comes out to play. I can count on one hand how many times the Cowboys have done that. Just a joke of a team all around.


Edit: MM and Schultz are some of the last people on the locker room that need to be calling people out. Only person that can call out others last night is the RB core and Diggs. Everyone else needs to shut up and get themselves and their clown mentality together.
Click to expand...
This isn't conflict as in people fighting in the locker room, and it's clearly a good thing that players don't accept losing and not playing well, And it's good for them to show it. There is no success in football without emotion or if players accept poor play and losing in stride.

That said, I don't expect these guys expressing themselves will magically solve all problems in an instant and they will all go out and win every game for the Gipper, but being frustrated with poor play and making losing unacceptable is the kind of culture winning teams have.
 
All great teams have locker room leaders who hold everyone accountable. In the 90's, even before there were rings, we had guys like Ken Norton Jr and Irvin getting in people's faces. Its a good thing. We need players who raise the standard. Not sure schultz is that guy but Micah Parsons should be the locker room leader of this team. We don't need a quiet locker room with guys like Witten and Romo. How did that work out?

What we also don't need guys going on social media and calling out teammates there. Thats a problem, but in the locker room, the more friction the better. Someone needs to light a fire under some of these guys and get them to play better.
 
They should be frustrated, it is their career. 40million or not, you gotta do your job right to earn the roster spot.
 
OmerV said:
This isn't conflict as in people fighting in the locker room, and it's clearly a good thing that players don't accept losing and not playing well, And it's good for them to show it. There is no success in football without emotion or if players accept poor play and losing in stride.

That said, I don't expect these guys expressing themselves will magically solve all problems in an instant and they will all go out and win every game for the Gipper, but being frustrated with poor play and making losing unacceptable is the kind of culture winning teams have.
Click to expand...
You’re 100% correct. Some people won’t get it though… many of which probably never played and never got to feel how bad it feels to let one of your team mates down. There’s nothing worse.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 8 more.
Total: 8,508 (members: 108, guests: 8,400)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,576
Messages
13,819,717
Members
23,780
Latest member
HoppleSopple
Back
Top