MMQB: Cowboys got a very good player in Cedric Thornton

RS12

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,524
Reaction score
29,869
The former Eagle has only four sacks in four NFL seasons, so there's a perception that he's a lower-tier signing. Not true. On first and second down, Thornton is as good as almost any NFL D-lineman. He has brute strength, lateral mobility and a knack for locating the ball. He can also penetrate against the run. The only hesitation with him in Dallas is, Where does he play along the 4-3 front? As a 3-4 end with the Eagles, Thornton was great because he could two-gap or one-gap, dependingon the formation. The only position that calls for two-gapping in a 4-3 scheme such as Rod Marinelli's is the nose shade. Thornton has never played there full-time, and at 6-3, he might be a tad tall for the role. The other option: playing him at 3-technique, where he'd rotate with Tyrone Crawford on base downs and maybe get a few more nickel pass-rushing opportunities than he did in Philadelphia. However Thornton winds up being used, let's not lose sight of the bigger picture: The Cowboys got a very good player.

http://sportsday.***BANNED-URL***/d.../mmqb-cowboys-got-good-player-cedric-thornton
 

DandyDon1722

It's been a good 'un, ain't it?
Messages
6,386
Reaction score
7,008
I have yet to read or hear a single negative about this signing. It's pretty obvious we are a better defense today with him.

Now if we could just get Weddle.

I hear he is making a decision tomorrow on one of four teams - Dallas is one of those teams.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
84,009
Reaction score
76,710
I have yet to read or hear a single negative about this signing. It's pretty obvious we are a better defense today with him.

Now if we could just get Weddle.

I hear he is making a decision tomorrow on one of four teams - Dallas is one of those teams.

I went to the Eagirls site to see what their fans thought about him...usually you'd hear the "He's not that good anyway and will get exposed" type of posts but they were very favorable. Its that rare occurrence of EVERYONE liking a player.
 

DandyDon1722

It's been a good 'un, ain't it?
Messages
6,386
Reaction score
7,008
I went to the Eagirls site to see what their fans thought about him...usually you'd hear the "He's not that good anyway and will get exposed" type of posts but they were very favorable. Its that rare occurrence of EVERYONE liking a player.

Funny you say that because Howard Erskine from Philly was on 105.3 in Dallas and while ripping the Cowboys about everything - he loved Thornton.
 

phildadon86

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,551
Reaction score
32,318
I have yet to read or hear a single negative about this signing. It's pretty obvious we are a better defense today with him.

Now if we could just get Weddle.

I hear he is making a decision tomorrow on one of four teams - Dallas is one of those teams.

Yeah, I wonder if our names are there to generate clicks or if we are actually one of the teams though.
 

Ken

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,709
Reaction score
17,370
It truly is weird. I wonder if the Eagirls were in a better cap situation would he be retained.

It really boiled down to Cox and Logan being their starting DTs in the 4-3 and not paying a 3rd guy the type of money Dallas did. 70 million in safeties and a ton wasted in RBs and Qbs will force that type of decision.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
84,009
Reaction score
76,710
They are moving to a 4-3 also so his starting position would have been likely lost since Bennie Logan is also a 1 tech type.

Yeah but for depth? A bit pricey for a depth guy but if he's a starter in this league i'd pay it to shore up my defensive line.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
84,009
Reaction score
76,710
It really boilded down to Cox and Logan being their starting DTs in the 4-3 and not pying a 3rd guy the type of money Dallas did. 70 million in safeties and a ton wasted in RBs and Qbs will force that type of decision.

Well that's what I was saying. If they didn't spend so casually and have to get rid of those contracts I wonder would they have retained him. Seems like they would've.
 

speedkilz88

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,950
Reaction score
23,098
Yeah but for depth? A bit pricey for a depth guy but if he's a starter in this league i'd pay it to shore up my defensive line.

I doubt they would want to give him starting money even if it was available.
 

Toruk_Makto

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,242
Reaction score
17,336
Good point - if I'm his agent I'm linking him to Dallas.

Why exactly? The rest of the league knows what some fans are finally coming to terms with...the Cowboys are very unlikely to dish out a big free agent contract and if we do it will be for a young player.
 

DandyDon1722

It's been a good 'un, ain't it?
Messages
6,386
Reaction score
7,008
Why exactly? The rest of the league knows what some fans are finally coming to terms with...the Cowboys are very unlikely to dish out a big free agent contract and if we do it will be for a young player.

I think it's because it's a position of need on the team and Jerry's reputation - deserved or not. Very unlikely does not mean they won't. Also, because of the attention the Cowboys get with any move or potential move they make. Saying the Ravens are interested is a yawn - saying the Cowboys are interested get's clicks.
 

Toruk_Makto

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,242
Reaction score
17,336
I think it's because it's a position of need on the team and Jerry's reputation - deserved or not. Very unlikely does not mean they won't. Also, because of the attention the Cowboys get with any move or potential move they make. Saying the Ravens are interested is a yawn - saying the Cowboys are interested get's clicks.

But why would his agent care if you as a fan clicked on a news story?

Hint: He wouldn't.
 

Maxmadden

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,143
Reaction score
4,369
Why exactly? The rest of the league knows what some fans are finally coming to terms with...the Cowboys are very unlikely to dish out a big free agent contract and if we do it will be for a young player.

Simply, tradition. We are Americas team, and everyone knows tradition or not if Jerry wants somebody he usually gets them. I agree with you that if you look back the last couple of years we aren't shelling out the big bucks. But, I think teams know they don't want to go to the mat with Jerry if he wants something.
 

Sportsbabe

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,968
Reaction score
5,039
The former Eagle has only four sacks in four NFL seasons, so there's a perception that he's a lower-tier signing. Not true. On first and second down, Thornton is as good as almost any NFL D-lineman. He has brute strength, lateral mobility and a knack for locating the ball. He can also penetrate against the run. The only hesitation with him in Dallas is, Where does he play along the 4-3 front? As a 3-4 end with the Eagles, Thornton was great because he could two-gap or one-gap, dependingon the formation. The only position that calls for two-gapping in a 4-3 scheme such as Rod Marinelli's is the nose shade. Thornton has never played there full-time, and at 6-3, he might be a tad tall for the role. The other option: playing him at 3-technique, where he'd rotate with Tyrone Crawford on base downs and maybe get a few more nickel pass-rushing opportunities than he did in Philadelphia. However Thornton winds up being used, let's not lose sight of the bigger picture: The Cowboys got a very good player.
http://sportsday.***BANNED-URL***/d.../mmqb-cowboys-got-good-player-cedric-thornton

In Nelli I trust.
 

casmith07

Attorney-at-Zone
Messages
31,538
Reaction score
9,312
I have yet to read or hear a single negative about this signing. It's pretty obvious we are a better defense today with him.

Now if we could just get Weddle.

I hear he is making a decision tomorrow on one of four teams - Dallas is one of those teams.

Weddle is likely to be too expensive. I would prefer a younger option via the draft but if we somehow land him for a good deal, we'll be a lot better defense.

Line of Gregory, Thornton, T. Crawford and Lawrence

Spelled by J. Crawford, T. McClain, Irving

Linebackers of Lee, R. McClain, and Hitchens spelled by Keith Smith and Damien Wilson

CBs: Scandrick, Carr, Claiborne as the top three with Olatoye & Mitchell in relief.

Safeties: Jones and Weddle, with Wilcox and Church in reserve.

Good defense. And that's without draftees.
 

speedkilz88

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,950
Reaction score
23,098
Weddle is likely to be too expensive. I would prefer a younger option via the draft but if we somehow land him for a good deal, we'll be a lot better defense.

Line of Gregory, Thornton, T. Crawford and Lawrence

Spelled by J. Crawford, T. McClain, Irving

Linebackers of Lee, R. McClain, and Hitchens spelled by Keith Smith and Damien Wilson

CBs: Scandrick, Carr, Claiborne as the top three with Olatoye & Mitchell in relief.

Safeties: Jones and Weddle, with Wilcox and Church in reserve.

Good defense. And that's without draftees.

Church's salary ballooned to 4.25 million this year. Makes sense to move him out and bring Weddle in at 5 million avg on a short deal.
 

FaSho

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,334
Reaction score
2,148
Church's salary ballooned to 4.25 million this year. Makes sense to move him out and bring Weddle in at 5 million avg on a short deal.

You are right. It would make sense, but I doubt the staff will get rid of Church.
 
Top