Pretty eclectic group. At least they all have big game success. Which I'm assuming plays heavily in your list as one of those guys isn't like the others stat wise and Lamar doesn't appear.mahomes is the gold standard now like Brady was and before him Montana.
After him, I would say Burrows because of what he has been able to do while tied to the Bungles
next, you have to talk about Stafford and Allen I believe. Hurts was possibly in that conversation but no more.
I'm thinking that you didn't pay attention to the Bills before Allen got there? And Allen has never had a complete offense. You insert 1A + 1B type receivers into the Bills offense and they're hanging up 50 burgers more games than not.Allen is the best threat as a running QB around; people talk about Jackson but Allen has more than doubled the TDs
But I look at a QB primarily as regards passing and Burrows simply is better then Allen doing that. Plus Burrows is carrying around all the dead weight of the Bungle Franchise.
You aren't going to give up a 1st for someone who is going to be a free agent after 8 games. Jerry totally screwed the pooch AGAIN with Pickens by waiting so long to sign or trade him.Buffalo should trade a first for Pickens….if we are gonna trade him that is…
If Jones or Cousins is available why would they take an unknown? That's a Jerry move.The Vikings know they have D that is playoff worthy but they lack a QB and even if and when Murray is back how long does he last . Can Dallas pry a 4 or perhaps a 5 out of the Vikings for Howell ? Just a thought to try and build back up the draft capital lacking in 27 .
If Jones or Cousins is available why would they take an unknown? That's a Jerry move.
I pay more attention then you have clearly. NO ONE has a complete offense. NO ONE.I'm thinking that you didn't pay attention to the Bills before Allen got there? And Allen has never had a complete offense. You insert 1A + 1B type receivers into the Bills offense and they're hanging up 50 burgers more games than not.
Jackson has not shined in post season play and that is one of the ways I rate a QBPretty eclectic group. At least they all have big game success. Which I'm assuming plays heavily in your list as one of those guys isn't like the others stat wise and Lamar doesn't appear.
I never said he was Brady. Brady was a true 1 of 1. Not a good comp.I pay more attention then you have clearly. NO ONE has a complete offense. NO ONE.
The elite QBs make do with lesser WRs all the time. Brady only had Moss as a great WR and won no SBs with him there. Wes Welker got a couple of rings though, right?
Manning was poor, eh. If Dak plays 70 years he might match Manning's playoff wins. That's what poor looks like.Jackson has not shined in post season play and that is one of the ways I rate a QB
Peyton Manning was poor in the Post season but arguably the greatest regular season QB of all time
I guess you think Dak didn't play poorly in the GB game because... stats.Those saying Dak and Romo are pretty much the same have lots of stats to back them up
both shined in regular season play but dropped off in the playoffs
Yet neither's stats in the playoffs dropped off significantly; less than ten rating points. So they did not play badly, overall in the playoffs. just did not shine
SF @ DAL