- Messages
- 47,997
- Reaction score
- 27,917
jdnalls said:Wow, that has been the crappiest mock draft I've seen yet in terms of our picks.
N-how.
jdnalls said:Wow, that has been the crappiest mock draft I've seen yet in terms of our picks.
Spontae said:Based upon his drafting history, Parcells will not take a CB at 11, nor will he take a big receiver or attractive RB. He will draft defense front 7 and offensive linemen this year until it hurts (or I will throw my TV out the window).
SkinsandTerps said:The Commanders take a TE at #9 ? With Edwards, Clayton, and Henry still on the board ? I sure hope not. Miller will not even go in the top 15 IMO.
The day Coakley gets on the scales at my house and it shows over 230 I'll believe it.wayne_motley said:personally, I like the first pick....I still say there's no way we take a LB in round 1, especially not another smallish guy, though he has played great.
secondary is our greatest need, and carlos rogers would be an awesome pick because he's over 6' and 200 lbs with great speed and plays physical...just what the doctor ordered in the NFC EAst, and he's the exact type of player who could later move to FS if any of our other CB's develop.
We need a CB much more than we need a LB....
Weaknesses: Could stand to add some weight and bulk up...Struggles to take on blocks...Will ignore his assignment at times in an effort to make a play.
6'4", 230....he's lighter than DAT or Coakley....I like the college production, but I just don't see BP going for this guy in round 1 when he's desperate in the secondary at 2 positions and needs a DL....I think we'll bring in a LB in FA.
wayne_motley said:personally, I like the first pick....I still say there's no way we take a LB in round 1, especially not another smallish guy, though he has played great.
secondary is our greatest need, and carlos rogers would be an awesome pick because he's over 6' and 200 lbs with great speed and plays physical...just what the doctor ordered in the NFC EAst, and he's the exact type of player who could later move to FS if any of our other CB's develop.
We need a CB much more than we need a LB....
Weaknesses: Could stand to add some weight and bulk up...Struggles to take on blocks...Will ignore his assignment at times in an effort to make a play.
6'4", 230....he's lighter than DAT or Coakley....I like the college production, but I just don't see BP going for this guy in round 1 when he's desperate in the secondary at 2 positions and needs a DL....I think we'll bring in a LB in FA.