perrykemp
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 11,503
- Reaction score
- 9,274
Back to the Packers discussion, I'm sure that there are teams with better cap management situations than the Cowboys, but I don't see the Packers as a good example because they don't really have options if they never allow themselves to go over their own self-imposed cap. They had a huge amount of cap space years ago when they considered signing Randy Moss, but they declined because they didn't want to go over their own self-imposed cap.
Interesting. I thought the Packer's main philosophy wasn't so much a self-imposed cap as it was holding their money in reserve to pay their own young talent which they typically have in abundance due to good drafting.
It's not like the Packers don't have money -- they are profitable every year, they have a quarter billion dollar reserve, they are the NFL's only non-profit organization, and they have no owner sifting profits off the top.
Example last year they had a bunch of cap space that they had been building up and they finally signed Rodgers and Matthews to two absolutely monster contracts in the off-season.
From what I read they had been saving up this off-season for BJ Raji's contract renewal but they've decided at this point to let Raji probably go.
I will say this -- it is hard to get a great handle on how the Packers handle their salary cap and why it looks so odd (so much free money) despite paying out such huge contracts to players like Rodgers.
Once thing I noticed on Over the Cap is that they only have $1.2m of dead money in 2014 which seems to be a very small amount. Is that an indicator that they are a "pay as you go" club in terms of salary cap spending?