GuitarBytes
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 327
- Reaction score
- 320
Since we're doing the 1 play theory.....I'd ask Dan Orlavsky......why did you run out the endzone when you played for Detroit, just curious? Then I'd get down to let's examine the whole game.....Dak failures, routes ran, play-calling.......then question the whole season of constant interceptions, and then I'd close with How does this get fixed?You can never say Dak failed, he has that (you can't get rid of me unless I want you too) contract. Moore did not have that option so Moore is the failure.
the two receivers were at the same level, Dak could throw to one or the other, the LB's movement was almost instantaneous and Dak decides to throw to the side where there are 3 defenders, did experts analyze that play? they must be Dak lovers just like you. pause at 1:55 vision is at the forefrontPause the video at 1:54
Hilton is just at the level of the DB playing in off-coverage.
- There is a Safety behind that DB.
- The read progression for Dak is right to left.
- The pass rusher got to Dak immediately after he released the pass.
- i.e. There was not any more time to progress to the point at which Hilton cleared the initial DB.
Receivers are only open if they get open at the correct time.
3 ex NFL QBs have already analyzed this play and didn't have an issue with Dak not throwing to Hilton.
I doubt that play is even called if Schultz would have stopped the clock like he was suppose to. Another element of poor coaching, he didn’t know the ruleI'm still waiting for someone to analyze the last play against SF this year and the last play against SF last year. Both were simply pathetic. I'd like to know if those two stupid plays are in the playbook? And I'm only partially in gest