Mosher's mock

In that scenario? It’s a trade or likel Campbell.

I like Starks but that’s too high for a safety.
 
I don't know if I'd take Compton, but I'd take whatever OT was at the top of our board
 
there is alot of value there to trade down a bit if you could find a partner but Id also find it hard to pass on will cambell or simmons. I am concerned about simmons injury from last year and how hes slated to return
 
Would make sense if Dallas cut Steele before his bonus was due.

Shift Guyton to RT, play Campbell at LT.

Like the player, just not another pick at OL when the draft is loaded with potential studs at DT.
I take Nolen at 12.
 
Aven8 said:
Another OT? A year after Guyton?
Click to expand...
In the scenario Mosher was given, yeah. An OT might be the clear best player on the board if you can't trade out of 12. And Steele kinda stinks now so it's not like you couldn't use another OT. If you grabbed an elite one, Steele becomes expendable and you can save a little on the cap if you dump him.

It's not an ideal situation but as said, in the scenario Mosher was given, it's the best option IMO. Unless you want to take Starks at 12 for FS.
 
John813 said:
Would make sense if Dallas cut Steele before his bonus was due.

Shift Guyton to RT, play Campbell at LT.

Like the player, just not another pick at OL when the draft is loaded with potential studs at DT.
I take Nolen at 12.
Click to expand...
Yeah this is how it would make sense.

Guyton to RT, Campbell to LT, you leave Tyler at LG where he just continues to kick ***, then likely Hoffman and Beebe slide into the C/RG slots and suddenly you might have the makings of a good OL again.
 
I saw this on X. This would be worst case scenario for Dallas. There is no one I would jump at left at 12. I might consider trading down, a few spots and picking up another 3rd. If I can't find a trade partner then I would probably consider Warren or Egbuka. Not what I would hope for but given this scenario I would look for a playmaker on offense. The one thing that could change this is if they have already released Steele. Then I'd have to take the OT. But even if they don't release Steele, you could look for the OT to move inside and become the next Zack Martin.

The good news is, at 12, they will almost certainly get a good player unless they totally screw this up.
 
that seems unlikely and a worse case situation but i will take Campbell or Nolen at 12.
 
J-man said:
Not a great choice there. I'd take Nolen if they consider it a reach, I don't.
Click to expand...
The mocks don't mean much but that being said, Nolen has been getting a lot of hype recently a few more recent mocks have him Top 15.
 
Sydla said:
In the scenario Mosher was given, yeah. An OT might be the clear best player on the board if you can't trade out of 12. And Steele kinda stinks now so it's not like you couldn't use another OT. If you grabbed an elite one, Steele becomes expendable and you can save a little on the cap if you dump him.

It's not an ideal situation but as said, in the scenario Mosher was given, it's the best option IMO. Unless you want to take Starks at 12 for FS.
Click to expand...
Id personally go Nolen because Im higher on him than PFN's board, but I dont think a 10 year starting LT is bad play either

Id really love to strengthen the interior, but in the draft we could actually getting solid starter production from a rookie at 44. Its that strong a draft at DT
 
If Simmons medical checked out, I’d go with him.

Otherwise, based strictly on the list shown in the tweet I’d go either Warren or Edbuka.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 55 more.
Total: 3,228 (members: 155, guests: 3,073)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,191
Messages
13,795,511
Members
23,774
Latest member
Dcfiles
Back
Top