Stautner
New Member
- Messages
- 10,691
- Reaction score
- 1
BigWillie;3989457 said:Ripken only played 667 games of his long career at 3B. There is only about a 40 game difference in games played at SS between Jeter and Ripken.
Not true about Honus. He played nearly 1900 of his 2777 games at SS.
True about Yount. He played nearly as many in the OF as he did at SS.
But the thing with Jeter, he's a great hitter for average and has gotten COMPLETELY overrated with his glove throughout his career. The accolades he has gotten with the glove is what separates him from other SS' in history. The GG's he has gotten are about as real as a man on Pluto. Statistically, year after year Jeter ranks among the worst SS in MLB, but somehow gets credit as being one of the best. His defensive career was basically made up of him making so many routine plays look difficult.
I'll give him credit for being a great hitter for average. I'll give him credit for being looked to as the leader in that Yankee clubhouse for so many years. But those two qualities doesn't equal him passing shortstops like Ripken, Wagner, Vaughan, etc.,
Top 10 at his position? Yes. Best ever? No.
My point about Ripken still stands though - he was not a shortstop when he got to 3,000. I want you to be clear that I didn't say that as a slap at Ripken, I was merely pointing out a fact about Jeter that I thought was worth noting.
As for Wagner, again the point still stands that Jeter was the only SS to reach 3,000 hits strictly as a SS. As for the exact split of games played at different positions, I knew Wagner played shortstop somewhat more than other positions combined, although I thought the split might have been closer. Still, your numbers show that Wagner played about 1/3 of his games at positions other than shortstop, and Wagner was playing those other positions all throughout his career, not just at the end like when Ripken moved to 3B.
AS for Jeter's glove, I certainly agree that he is no Ozzie Smith, Omar Vizquel or in the league of the elite glove men at SS, but he is solid and he is a smart in the field and contributes with his intangibles as much as any player I've ever seen, so that helps boost him in my eyes. Intangibles do matter, and at SS more than probably any position other than catcher, so I think that is a fair, if difficult to quantify, consideration.
Still, I agree he is not the best of all time, I just think he has a legitimate place in the discussion.