Must be the pants

jackrussell

Last of the Duke Street Kings
Messages
4,165
Reaction score
1
Customer sues dry cleaner for $65 million over lost pants

WASHINGTON (AP) A missing pair of pants has led to one big suit.

A customer got so steamed when a dry cleaner lost his trousers that he sued for $65 million. Two years later, he is still pressing his suit.

The case has demoralized the South Korean immigrant owners of the mom-and-pop business and brought demands that the customer — an administrative law judge in Washington — be disbarred and removed from office for pursuing a frivolous and abusive claim.

Jin Nam Chung, Ki Chung and their son, Soo Chung, are considering moving back to Seoul, seven years after they opened their dry-cleaning business in the nation’s capital, said their lawyer, Chris Manning.

“They’re out a lot of money, but more importantly, incredibly disenchanted with the system,” Manning said. “This has destroyed their lives.”

The customer, Roy L. Pearson Jr., who has been representing himself, declined to comment.

According to court documents, the problem began in May 2005 when Pearson became a judge and brought several suits for alterations to Custom Cleaners in Washington. A pair of pants from one suit was missing when he requested it two days later.

Pearson asked the cleaners for the full price of the suit: more than $1,000.

But a week later, the Chungs said the pants had been found and refused to pay. Pearson said those were not his pants, and decided to take the Chungs to the cleaners and sue.

Manning said the cleaners have made three settlement offers to Pearson: $3,000, then $4,600, then $12,000.

http://www.cantonrep.com/index.php?ID=352168&categoryID=23
 

needforspeed

Legend in my spare time
Messages
667
Reaction score
0
jackrussell;1487607 said:
Customer sues dry cleaner for $65 million over lost pants

WASHINGTON (AP) A missing pair of pants has led to one big suit.

A customer got so steamed when a dry cleaner lost his trousers that he sued for $65 million. Two years later, he is still pressing his suit.

The case has demoralized the South Korean immigrant owners of the mom-and-pop business and brought demands that the customer — an administrative law judge in Washington — be disbarred and removed from office for pursuing a frivolous and abusive claim.

Jin Nam Chung, Ki Chung and their son, Soo Chung, are considering moving back to Seoul, seven years after they opened their dry-cleaning business in the nation’s capital, said their lawyer, Chris Manning.

“They’re out a lot of money, but more importantly, incredibly disenchanted with the system,” Manning said. “This has destroyed their lives.”

The customer, Roy L. Pearson Jr., who has been representing himself, declined to comment.

According to court documents, the problem began in May 2005 when Pearson became a judge and brought several suits for alterations to Custom Cleaners in Washington. A pair of pants from one suit was missing when he requested it two days later.

Pearson asked the cleaners for the full price of the suit: more than $1,000.

But a week later, the Chungs said the pants had been found and refused to pay. Pearson said those were not his pants, and decided to take the Chungs to the cleaners and sue.

Manning said the cleaners have made three settlement offers to Pearson: $3,000, then $4,600, then $12,000.

http://www.cantonrep.com/index.php?ID=352168&categoryID=23

lawyers :rolleyes:
 

ArmyCowboy

New Member
Messages
951
Reaction score
0
If the fact that this lawsuit has been brought to court, isn't an indictment of our legal system, nothing else ever will be.

This is worse than the lard-*** who sued McD's for "making him fat."
 

BrAinPaiNt

Mike Smith aka Backwoods Sexy
Staff member
Messages
78,654
Reaction score
43,000
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
ArmyCowboy;1487784 said:
If the fact that this lawsuit has been brought to court, isn't an indictment of our legal system, nothing else ever will be.

This is worse than the lard-*** who sued McD's for "making him fat."

I have no problem with someone trying to sue someone else...even in this case or the mcdonalds made me fat case....IF...IF...once it gets to court and the judge or jury sees how silly it is the person suing has to pay a huge fine (partly to the defendants) for the frivolous law suit.

That should curb the number of people suing for this kind of silly crap OR the amount of money they are suing for in these cases.
 

Mavs Man

All outta bubble gum
Messages
4,672
Reaction score
0
I can't believe this is still being pursued - for $65 million, how can any judge take this seriously? Especially when they've made several offers that would have more than paid for the value of the suit (not just the trousers).

That's Washington for you, though.

On the bright side, I have to think the writer had some fun with this story:

-missing pants led to one big suit
-the customer got steamed
-[he] is still pressing his suit
-take [them] to the cleaners and sue
 

Mavs Man

All outta bubble gum
Messages
4,672
Reaction score
0
Thankfully, this case was decided in favor of the dry cleaner:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070625/ap_on_fe_st/67_million_pants

Dry cleaner wins in missing-pants case
By LUBNA TAKRURI, Associated Press Writer
June 25, 2007

A judge on Monday ruled in favor of a dry cleaner that was sued for $54 million over a missing pair of pants in a case that garnered international attention and renewed calls for litigation reform.

District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Judith Bartnoff ruled that the Korean immigrant owners of Custom Cleaners did not violate the city's Consumer Protection Act by failing to live up to Roy L. Pearson's expectations of the "Satisfaction Guaranteed" sign that was once placed in the store window.

"Plaintiff Roy L. Pearson, Jr. takes nothing from the defendants, and defendants Soo Chung, Jin Nam Chung and Ki Y. Chung are awarded the costs of this action against the plaintiff Roy L. Pearson, Jr.," the ruling read.

Pearson, an administrative law judge, originally sought $67 million from the Chungs after he claimed they lost a pair of suit trousers and later tried to return a pair that he said was not his. He arrived at the figure by adding up years of law violations and almost $2 million in common law claims. Pearson later dropped demands for damages related to the pants and focused his claims on signs in the shop, which have since been removed.

Chris Manning, the Chungs' attorney, countered that no reasonable person would interpret the signs to be an unconditional promise of satisfaction.

The two-day trial earlier this month drew a standing-room-only crowd, including many Korean and international media outlets covering the story. It even overshadowed the drunken driving trial of former Mayor Marion Barry.

The Chungs also said the trial had taken an enormous financial and emotional toll on them and exposed them to widespread ridicule.
 
Top