xwalker
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 57,202
- Reaction score
- 64,709
I feel like I'm being set up a little bit here but I'll take a shot.... The highlight film you provided, as with all highlight films, shows some amazing plays by Nevis but because I didn't want to base my opinion off of just that I looked some more and found this: http://draftbreakdown.com/video/drake-nevis-vs-bama-vs/ Alabama has a great offensive line so I thought It would be a good test of his abilities. I thought he played well showing good strength at the point of attack and the ability to penetrate and be disruptive. I thought Sutton did better splitting blocks but Nevis held up against the run better. The bad part about that is since Drake is no longer on our roster, Rod must no believe in him. Can he make Sutton into more than Nevis was? No one really knows because as we all know, you have to have the "want to" to play for Rod. As I said, I think Sutton is more disruptive which is saying something because I thought Nevis had some nice moments for us last year. ... not great but something to work with. In summary, I believe that Sutton is more penetrating and that seems to be something Rod desires and maybe Rod can get more use from him than Nevis.
Nevis played with excellent effort. I was amazed how often he made it out to the flat to get in on a tackle.
Nevis had a great 1st step but couldn't get off blocks if he didn't win initially. He was an example, IMO, of the importance of arm length. Some of the super strong guys can overcome short arms, but in general it can be a big problem for some players. Height can help overcome short arms, but Nevis and Sutton are both under 6-1.