My thoughts on WHY romo got put in

Jimz31

The Sarcastic One
Messages
14,388
Reaction score
231
I think that BP saw that Bledsoe looked rattled and that Bledsoe had absolutely NO trust in the o-line to block anybody.

I think it was a move that would allow the TE's to go out on their patterns instead of having to block, because when they weren't blocking the Giants seemingly had a free guy coming in every time.

Having a more mobile QB in there to open up routes is what I think made BP pull the trigger in this game....and I think that BP saw this game going this way....hence the reported comments that Romo may get in there tonight.
 
what is the point of a 2-TE offense if both are always trying to block and our crash-test-dummy-QB is on his back.

romo for the rest of the season is a no-brainer.
 
chinch;1110663 said:
what is the point of a 2-TE offense if both are always trying to block and our crash-test-dummy-QB is on his back.

romo for the rest of the season is a no-brainer.

We'll see...but don't be surprised to see Bledsoe back in there next week...and I wouldn't be surprised if BP lies or doesn't tell the media who is starting next week.
 
Bledsoe had driven them down and scored. Then he made a bad decision on the INT. It happens to the best of them.

He had been sacked 4 times, but Mcnabb would have been sacked on three of them and delhomme would have fumbled two of them.

We had the momentum and the ball coming out in the 2nd half. Romo's inexperience gave both of them back.

At half time, I was 100% sure we would come back and win this game. When Romo threw that first INT, I was confident we will be lucky to finish 8-8.
 
CowboyBlog;1110702 said:
He had been sacked 4 times, but Mcnabb would have been sacked on three of them and delhomme would have fumbled two of them.

Which is WHY I think that BP pulled the trigger.
 
It seems we are in a catch-22 here....people think that if Bledsoe starts, Carolina sets a sack record....if Romo starts, Romo sets an INT record.

Neither is true....relax people.
 
Jimz31;1110626 said:
I think that BP saw that Bledsoe looked rattled and that Bledsoe had absolutely NO trust in the o-line to block anybody.

I think it was a move that would allow the TE's to go out on their patterns instead of having to block, because when they weren't blocking the Giants seemingly had a free guy coming in every time.

Having a more mobile QB in there to open up routes is what I think made BP pull the trigger in this game....and I think that BP saw this game going this way....hence the reported comments that Romo may get in there tonight.

Parcells said Bledsoe made the wrong decision on the interception. The play was designed to go to the other side.
 
bigbadroy;1110822 said:
my thought is jerry told him to put romo in

I kinda had the feeling that Jerry didn't quite agree with the decision...but that is just me.
 
I agree, TO likes him some ROMO so he told Jerry to play Romo! Guess what Down by 5 at halftime, they bench Bledsoe..........
 
Bledsoe is shell shocked you could see it on his face on the sidelines. He is done after this year, he riding off intot he sunset with the final year of his signing bonus.
 
jrumann59;1110864 said:
Bledsoe is shell shocked you could see it on his face on the sidelines. He is done after this year, he riding off intot he sunset with the final year of his signing bonus.

He certainly looked like it when he was actually IN the game.
 
Jimz31,
That just doesn't make sense. What do you mean?

Nevermind--response to a much earlier post.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,432
Messages
13,874,023
Members
23,791
Latest member
mashburn
Back
Top