New low for The N.F.C. Least

[Flamma]

Winston is a good back up to have. He has experience and can throw TDs. But, he does not have the upside (ceiling) that Dart has for primarily two reasons:
1. Mobility (you saw what Dart can bring in game 1)
2. Propensity for turnovers (see his resume for proof)

But like I said, I prefer Winston to be a guy filling in for a couple of weeks u til the #1 gets it back together again. I’m a bit uneasy thinking about him playing every game. Up until now, we have only played one playoff caliber team- Rams- and we got punched out…and yes Winston looked horrible. I don’t think he was prepared probably not expecting Dart to get injured on the first offensive series.

We have the Jaguars, 49ers, Seahawks, and Eagles twice waiting for us. Plenty of time left to judge against higher echelon teams.

Disclaimer: I really don’t TODAY consider the Eagles to be “high echelon” due to the many changes and injuries they have been dealing with.

I agree. I'd much rather play the Giants with Winston. Not that either one would matter with our D. But Dart had a very good game against the Cowboys. One pass that came semi close to being picked. But sharp besides that. Although Winston played well, most of that came from what the defense handed to him at the end of the game.

 

[Flamma]

The other variable you also need to look at is the GM and what power the GM has over the coach? (Honestly, if I'm the owner of the Giants, I'm listening more to the coach than the GM in the scenario LOL).

Let's face it, as bad as Quinn is, take all the head coaches and GM's in the NFC east on each team, and who is at the bottom of the barrel in the division? Sad to say, my money is on Jerry and Shotty. THAT'S what scares me no matter how the season plays out for the Cowboys.

You're not the only one to bring this up. I've heard this from several people. But they added an individual. Look at the GM, coach, and QB. We're probably not at the top of the list.