Newsflash for our DC....
- Thread starter Jimz31
- Start date
Quit with the adjustments downwards.
Tusan_Homichi
Heisenberg
- Messages
- 11,059
- Reaction score
- 3,485
No kidding. It's like we backed off to see what Rodgers would do instead of just doing what had worked thus far. If he beats what was working against Favre? Fine, but don't change it just because Rodgers came in the game.
Next_years_Champs
New Member
- Messages
- 833
- Reaction score
- 0
What a stupid thread this team is 11-1, I'm sure you could do better. NOT!!!!
Tusan_Homichi
Heisenberg
- Messages
- 11,059
- Reaction score
- 3,485
Next_years_Champs;1800168 said:
Yes, we're 11-1 and I don't think anyone is complaining about the job we were doing on Favre. However, when he left, we stopped attacking. I just wonder why we did that is all.
dbair1967
Arch Defender
- Messages
- 30,782
- Reaction score
- 1
yeah, it should have bee a rout...not sure what they were thinking once Favre went out...they should have thrown the kitchen sink at Rodgers, instead they laid back and played some of the softest coverage we've seen all year
but we're 11-1 and have a few extra days to make adjustments and get healthier...hopefully they can figure some things out
David
but we're 11-1 and have a few extra days to make adjustments and get healthier...hopefully they can figure some things out
David
Chocolate Lab
Run-loving Dino
- Messages
- 37,107
- Reaction score
- 11,450
I think the players just relaxed when Favre went out. Obviously, we were playing as well as we have all year against him with tons of pressure and the INT, and it's like they thought the game was over when Rodgers came in. Then they got a little momentum and got rolling.
I hate to see it because now people will claim we suck since Aaron Rodgers scored on us, but still, we were kicking Favre's butt 27-10 while he was in.
I hate to see it because now people will claim we suck since Aaron Rodgers scored on us, but still, we were kicking Favre's butt 27-10 while he was in.
jrumann59
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 15,017
- Reaction score
- 8,770
It was all RW's fault he was letting all those receivers catch stuff in front of him and missing all those tackles on short passes...wait he wasn't in there he was replaced by people that people on this very board said were better in coverage...
Next_years_Champs
New Member
- Messages
- 833
- Reaction score
- 0
I stand by what I said above this is a stupid thread you don't know what the coaches called, Green Bay is a good team and the Cowboy players let up a little bit.
News flash players make plays and coaches coach. I'm tired of all the negative crap, I've watched this team since 1960 and its never been 11-1.
News flash players make plays and coaches coach. I'm tired of all the negative crap, I've watched this team since 1960 and its never been 11-1.
Jimz31
The Sarcastic One
- Messages
- 14,388
- Reaction score
- 231
Next_years_Champs;1800309 said:
Is there a problem with stating the obvious? We could have EASILY lost this game due to a defensive scheme change....a change which NEVER should have materialized.
There is NOTHING wrong with pointing these things out...that's why we are called FANS....as in FANATIC for our team and wanting something closer to perfection than what that second half was....if you want a board that always gives each other high fives, go find another board.....we aren't all just robots who don't see things.
pugilist
Stick N Move
- Messages
- 7,427
- Reaction score
- 10,367
Next_years_Champs;1800309 said:
too bad the NFL doesn't hand out Lombardi Trophies for regular season records. I'd rather be 10-6 and run the table in the playoffs with a SB appearance (at least) than be 15-1 and get bounced in the 1st round
Jimz31
The Sarcastic One
- Messages
- 14,388
- Reaction score
- 231
dwarecwby311;1800341 said:
EXACTLY! If our DC continues making boneheaded defensive scheme changes midway through games in the playoffs, we'll be bounced...but no worry, we have guys like Next_Years_Champs that will be shocked and wonder THEN why we did it.
Bob Sacamano
Benched
- Messages
- 57,084
- Reaction score
- 3
what's wierd, is that the only 2 young QBs we faced, a rookie Trent Edwards, a spare Aaron Rodgers, and we rush straight at them
yet we mix it up against the vets, I just wished we would go all out against all QBs
and I'm tired of Wade saying one thing, but doing another
"w/ a young QB, you try to confuse him" we never try that against any young QBs
"against this type of O, you want to play either man, or an aggressive zone" we play a soft-zone tonight
yet we mix it up against the vets, I just wished we would go all out against all QBs
and I'm tired of Wade saying one thing, but doing another
"w/ a young QB, you try to confuse him" we never try that against any young QBs
"against this type of O, you want to play either man, or an aggressive zone" we play a soft-zone tonight
Next_years_Champs
New Member
- Messages
- 833
- Reaction score
- 0
dwarecwby311;1800341 said:
Oh I guess they hand them out in week 13 if you win by 30???
I don't think so.
CaptainAmerica
Active Member
- Messages
- 5,030
- Reaction score
- 26
I think we relaxed but I agree with the comment that Rodgers took the underneath stuff where Favre was getting caught up in trying to match Romo and throw it deep too much. One reason the pressure was getting to Favre was because he was holding the ball trying to get it deep.
Our secondary could use another good cover corner that is for sure. I hate when teams spread us out and go shotgun, quick throws. We don't defend that very well.
Our secondary could use another good cover corner that is for sure. I hate when teams spread us out and go shotgun, quick throws. We don't defend that very well.