NFC Championship: Eagles - 25 vs Cardinals - 32 Game Thread

[MetalHead]

The refs missed the call, but the end result was the correct one.

No it was not.
It should have been AZ ball.

 

[Dallaslullaby]

Blatant intentional grounding

At last called :laugh2:

 

[StylisticS]

That better be grounding

 

[Da Hammer]

lol @ McNabb's usual choking self

 

[BigDFan5]

McNabb starting the "I'm losing" limp already

 

[kmp77]

McNabb had a WIDE open WR to his left.

 

[The Panch]

No it was not.
It should have been AZ ball.

Why?? If it touched the player, the ball is automatically down because he had his foot out of bounds when it hit him.

 

[tomson75]

You guys need to chill. If it did touch the Eagle player, it would still be Philly ball cause it touched him while he was out of bounds.

They don't think it hit out of bounds. They think it touched the Eagle player after his foot slid out of bounds. And I can't tell whether it did or not.

that was clearly not gonna go to Az they would have just waisted that challenge

Correct.

 

[zrinkill]

The whistle did not blow till after the Cardinal landed on the ball ..... I just rewatched it.

 

[locked&loaded]

also these refs are to old, they arent fast enough to get to the spot and there losing there site. There should be a legit endurance, speed and seeing test.

 

[dadymat]

I think this is appropriate............

http://i102.***BLOCKED***/albums/m109/dadymat/102306mcnabbpuking-01.gif

 

[5Countem5]

McNabb starting the "I'm losing" limp already

You knew it was coming....

 

[zrinkill]

Why?? If it touched the player, the ball is automatically down because he had his foot out of bounds when it hit him.

no it did not.

 

[Dallaslullaby]

When is fitz contracted until?

 

[tomson75]

No it was not.
It should have been AZ ball.

It hit the Eagles player's forearm while he was out. Eagles ball.

 

[Avery]

Pick six please.

 

[sacase]

honestly now that I seen it again, it hits the guys forarm after it hits the ground, you can see the ball change directions a little bit. correct call, but bad that they couldn't challenge it.

 

[SultanOfSix]

The refs are biased. Screw this nonsense about sucking. They constantly miss the most obvious calls and then have the president of r****** - whatever his name is -make up some lame *** reason why it was the right call. Just like their imaginary tuck rule. If that was the 'Boys playing they would have called it so that it was reviewable and made sure that it was Arizona's ball.

 

[AlcoholicNinja]

A stupid rule saved AZ a wasted challenge. Looked pretty clear that the ball hit the Eagle player's forearm and changed direction, while his foot was out of bounds.

 

[tomson75]

no it did not.

Yes, it did. The ball's rotation clearly changed when it hit his forearm.