RunDMC
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,407
- Reaction score
- 2,286
But the fact remains is that Taylor is better than Weeden by a wide margin.
Based off what? Two good games against mediocre teams?
But the fact remains is that Taylor is better than Weeden by a wide margin.
Based off what? Two good games against mediocre teams?
Based off what? Two good games against mediocre teams?
Based off Weeden losing his last 10 starts.
Yeah because he's the only reason the Browns stink.
He wasn't the only reason but losing 10 starts in a row should tell you something about the QB. If Weeden wasn't a Cowboy, you wouldn't be defending him this staunchly. Don't know how anybody could defend 0-10 in your last 10 starts.
I'm defending Weeden because it's ridiculous that people are using his 0-10 record as a basis for why Taylor who hasn't done a damn thing in this league is better. How would Taylor do if he didn't have that big, bad defense and when he's healthy one of the best backs in the game in McCoy? I highly doubt he would have had any more success than Weeden did with the Browns.