NFC vs. AFC

EveryoneElse;1373559 said:
The AFC wins 10.6 games more a year against the NFC, which averages out to be a record of 42-22.


That's what I'm talking about...! :confused:

Oh well, not to beat a dead horse, but, to me, it just seems very strange how the AFC became more dominate then the NFC, especially in this so called "day of parity"?

:eek::
 
5Stars;1373571 said:
That's what I'm talking about...! :confused:

Oh well, not to beat a dead horse, but, to me, it just seems very strange how the AFC became more dominate then the NFC, especially in this so called "day of parity"?

:eek::
ask yourself why the nfc used to be dominate while your at it
 
bigbadroy;1373616 said:
ask yourself why the nfc used to be dominate while your at it


Stop confusing me! One problem at a time, please!


;)
 
The fault lies with the Packers.....

The NFC won 13 straight SBs till the Packers played the Broncos.....The Broncos were 0-4 in the SB, getting their butts handed to them in every single instance....until they played the Packers.

After the Broncos beat the Packers....If I am not mistaken, the NFC has only won 2 SBs.....Rams (Vermeil) and Bucs (Gruden)......

I hate this parity crap....all it did was destroy the greatness that was Dallas and SF....

The salary cap handcuffed free spenders like Jones and Debartalo....and just imagine how things would have been if Snyder owned the skins prior to the new rules....he would have probably had yankees sized payrolls.
 
The NFC isn't that much weaker, the AFC is just top heavy. They have really good teams, or really awful teams. The NFC is the total opposite, they have loads of good teams that just beat up on each other every year. The NFC East is a prime example.
 
Biggems;1373654 said:
The fault lies with the Packers.....

The NFC won 13 straight SBs till the Packers played the Broncos.....The Broncos were 0-4 in the SB, getting their butts handed to them in every single instance....until they played the Packers.

After the Broncos beat the Packers....If I am not mistaken, the NFC has only won 2 SBs.....Rams (Vermeil) and Bucs (Gruden)......

I hate this parity crap....all it did was destroy the greatness that was Dallas and SF....

The salary cap handcuffed free spenders like Jones and Debartalo....and just imagine how things would have been if Snyder owned the skins prior to the new rules....he would have probably had yankees sized payrolls.

I remember that game....that's around that same time the AFC became more dominate...it has to be parity! That is when everything started to become equal...

As far as the Midget goes? I'm not worried that he would have a team before the salary cap! He would still get it wrong! :D


Anyway, this thread needs closed...because my question was to "open answered"...and that don't work!


;)
 
GoinForSix;1373655 said:
The NFC isn't that much weaker, the AFC is just top heavy. They have really good teams, or really awful teams. The NFC is the total opposite, they have loads of good teams that just beat up on each other every year. The NFC East is a prime example.


That's a good point...but the NFCE is not as dominate as it once was...

Is it more finesse (AFC) against physical play (NFC)? :confused:


Oh well, I should have never asked such question...


THIS THREAD IS CLOSED





:confused:
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,310
Messages
13,865,071
Members
23,789
Latest member
mattyice
Back
Top