NFCE positional rankings

I think the rankings overall are pretty fair. Sure the gnats are a little high in some places and no list is ever going to be perfect, especially because everyone is going to have a different opinion. The biggest gripe I have is at RB. And tbf, if our unproven backups are taken into consideration, maybe not so far off
 
Ehhh, I think we overrate our RBs. For starters, Williams is a decent, not so special back. And we have questionable depth. I also worry about regression with Williams.

Philly clearly is better than we are. I think both Washington and NY are deeper than we are. So I can't quibble. If they had put us 2nd, I probably wouldn't have had an issue with that either.
How is Philly clearly? Let me say if you are factoring the whole group to me all of these teams are mediocre. But if we are basing it off last year Eagles backs weren’t as good. I like Commanders as far as depth but no real game changer.

I think the NYG job will either boost Harbaugh into the stratosphere since he is a psuedo-GM as well or will kill his career because he is a psuedo-gm. IMHO I think he is a fraud, he is not an X's and O's HC, and has benefited from some very good coordinators and assistant coaches.
I agree. I don’t see mid I see either really good or really bad.
 
Ehhh, I think we overrate our RBs. For starters, Williams is a decent, not so special back. And we have questionable depth. I also worry about regression with Williams.

Philly clearly is better than we are. I think both Washington and NY are deeper than we are. So I can't quibble. If they had put us 2nd, I probably wouldn't have had an issue with that either.
Without Williams production, the offense will struggle. He’s a very special back and one the Cowboys haven’t had in a long while.
 
What about ST's.

As a unit. And individual.

K - Dallas
P - not sure, but Anger is pretty good
PR - Turpin can be dangerous
KR - Turpin can be dangerous

ST's overall - Dallas needs improvement but not sure where to put them in comparison, 2nd or 3rd maybe.
That’s why these rankings are meaningless. Every year teams are different. Different players, different coaches so you can’t “rate” units that you’ve never seen play before. Good point about the ST’s. That’s a 3rd of the team and they didn’t even touch it. Another reason why this ranking is meaningless.
 
You don't think the HC has any affect on position groups?
I can see if he was a position coach but he’s not. He literally just had a terrible team last year. It’s insulting to say he’s better than Sirianni who I don’t even like but he’s been to two 2sbs.

Harbaugh is overrated. People forget how he had a two time mvp and underachieved. He’s living off his first SB and his consistency if mediocrity.
 
Rankings are all out of whack and overrating the Giants…
How much time do we have to spend on here educating the fan base that rankings, ratings, all the lists, even the mock drafts, and all the opinions,

Heck even college football the early season rankings were like my Texas Longhorns were ranked number one last year, I thought that was ridiculous, having Manning ranked as the Heisman number one etcetera etcetera ,before the season started ,before a game was played ,we all know that OSU was a better team They were the national champions and yet the Texas Longhorns had to play them in game one with all that heat on them right out of the box.. I would have had my own Texas Longhorn team ranked 5th to start the season that's how I felt..


that's it that's all they are Even if it's for one of my cowboys like it's a pro ranking like a high rank I don't care I don't listen to it I don't need that..

I make my own opinions. But yes having our running back ranked last when he was like the best in the division last year is just stupid it was like last year the ranking our run game 32nd before the season started but yeah there's some very strong homerism whoever made that list you could feel it...

Want to pick on a fan base but I could probably pick out who made that who they're affiliated with lol
 
That’s why these rankings are meaningless. Every year teams are different. Different players, different coaches so you can’t “rate” units that you’ve never seen play before. Good point about the ST’s. That’s a 3rd of the team and they didn’t even touch it. Another reason why this ranking is meaningless.
Right.
I usually do not go by rankings list. But always need to look at them as well.
 
That’s why these rankings are meaningless. Every year teams are different. Different players, different coaches so you can’t “rate” units that you’ve never seen play before. Good point about the ST’s. That’s a 3rd of the team and they didn’t even touch it. Another reason why this ranking is meaningless.
They are meaningless and why I don’t usually even pay attention to them. But when I do I either agree with them or laugh and don’t take em seriously.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,074
Messages
14,510,440
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top