NFL Network

[SLATEmosphere]

I usually don't watch this trash, but i wanted to check in to see what Marshall Fraud and that big fat dancing bear Warren Sapp had to say.

Well...we're 30 min into the show and not ONE mention of the Cowboys win.
:laugh2: :laugh2:

Unbelievable. Guarenteed you if we lost that **** would be in the first segment.

Sorry, just thought how funny and unprofessional NFL network is.

 

[KJJ]

I usually don't watch this trash, but i wanted to check in to see what Marshall Fraud and that big fat dancing bear Warren Sapp had to say.

Well...we're 30 min into the show and not ONE mention of the Cowboys win.
:laugh2: :laugh2:

Unbelievable. Guarenteed you if we lost that **** would be in the first segment.

Sorry, just thought how funny and unprofessional NFL network is.

I love NFL Total Access. I'm not thrilled with some of the cast of characters like Sapp who sounds like he needs a de garbler and Jamie Dukes who never shuts up but other than that I like the show especially the insider info.

 

[DandyDon1722]

Unprofessional is exactly right. You can also add a lack of credibility when pure bias seeps into analysis. How does this get by the producers there. I've heard guys talk about how the on-air personalities are starting to call these guys out, namely Irvin and Rich Eisen. I think someone posted this weekend Rich Eisen saying to Marshall Faulk after his pre-game rant..."What is wrong with you today?"

For as much as the Yankees are hated or the Lakers, do ever hear analysis on ESPN's baseball or basketball teams get skewed because of personal feelings?

Last two examples. John Clayton in early December on the Cowboys chances down the stretch. "They are going to be in trouble when one of their offensive lineman go down." Brilliant - a "what if" scenario. By the way this was before Columbo got hurt.

Second - Linda Cohen wrote a blog entitled..."Oh No Cowboy Fans - Tony Romo's in Vegas!"

I absolutely blasted her in the comment section below her piece with the facts of that trip. Have not heard a peep from her since about the Cowboys.

 

[Turf Toe]

Unprofessional is exactly right. You can also add a lack of credibility when pure bias seeps into analysis. How does this get by the producers there. I've heard guys talk about how the on-air personalities are starting to call these guys out, namely Irvin and Rich Eisen. I think someone posted this weekend Rich Eisen saying to Marshall Faulk after his pre-game rant..."What is wrong with you today?"

For as much as the Yankees are hated or the Lakers, do ever hear analysis on ESPN's baseball or basketball teams get skewed because of personal feelings?

Last two examples. John Clayton in early December on the Cowboys chances down the stretch. "They are going to be in trouble when one of their offensive lineman go down." Brilliant - a "what if" scenario. By the way this was before Columbo got hurt.

Second - Linda Cohen wrote a blog entitled..."Oh No Cowboy Fans - Tony Romo's in Vegas!"

I absolutely blasted her in the comment section below her piece with the facts of that trip. Have not heard a peep from her since about the Cowboys.

Linda Cohen iz hott!! id waxx that!

 

[Hoofbite]

Unprofessional is exactly right. You can also add a lack of credibility when pure bias seeps into analysis. How does this get by the producers there. I've heard guys talk about how the on-air personalities are starting to call these guys out, namely Irvin and Rich Eisen. I think someone posted this weekend Rich Eisen saying to Marshall Faulk after his pre-game rant..."What is wrong with you today?"

For as much as the Yankees are hated or the Lakers, do ever hear analysis on ESPN's baseball or basketball teams get skewed because of personal feelings?

Last two examples. John Clayton in early December on the Cowboys chances down the stretch. "They are going to be in trouble when one of their offensive lineman go down." Brilliant - a "what if" scenario. By the way this was before Columbo got hurt.

Second - Linda Cohen wrote a blog entitled..."Oh No Cowboy Fans - Tony Romo's in Vegas!"

I absolutely blasted her in the comment section below her piece with the facts of that trip. Have not heard a peep from her since about the Cowboys.

And you did exactly what they want people to do.

 

[grp05]

Linda Cohn? Her tooth/gum ratio is the stuff of nightmares. Although I do enjoy the fine work of Rachel Nichols.

 

[SLATEmosphere]

Still no mention...this is amazing..

 

[SLATEmosphere]

Linda Cohen iz hott!! id waxx that!

I hope your ****ing kidding.

 

[tomson75]

Linda Cohn? Her tooth/gum ratio is the stuff of nightmares.

:laugh2:

...and if her foopa gets any bigger she's going to need a wheelbarrow.

 

[SLATEmosphere]

ohhhh Lindsey Soto.

I'd waxx that alllll night.

 

[Turf Toe]

I hope your ****ing kidding.

nah im f' realz!! she a hott ****! thick just how i likes em

 

[Don Corleone]

I usually don't watch this trash, but i wanted to check in to see what Marshall Fraud and that big fat dancing bear Warren Sapp had to say.

Well...we're 30 min into the show and not ONE mention of the Cowboys win.
:laugh2: :laugh2:

Unbelievable. Guarenteed you if we lost that **** would be in the first segment.

Sorry, just thought how funny and unprofessional NFL network is.

I was thinking the same thing, but they want the team with the biggest ratings draw later in the show to keep you watching. I tune in to the last 15 minutes on purpose.

 

[dcfanatic]

Still no mention...this is amazing..

Learn the game son.

The Cowboys-Eagles game stunk. It was a blowout.

The Packers-Cards game had the most juice from the weekend.

So you open it up with the big story and then you drag people like through the entire show as you wait for the Cowboys stuff.

The show is on for an hour and half.

The Cowboys talk is coming up now. Top of the hour and they teased it along for an hour. It's how it's done. Has nothing to do with any bias by the network.

As for some of the mo-mo's on the set, that's another story.

 

[Don Corleone]

:laugh2: Marshall Fraud: "The Cowboys haven't faced a running game in 4 weeks."

You can't win this guy over.

 

[SLATEmosphere]

Learn the game son.

The Cowboys-Eagles game stunk. It was a blowout.

The Packers-Cards game had the most juice from the weekend.

So you open it up with the big story and then you drag people like through the entire show as you wait for the Cowboys stuff.

The show is on for an hour and half.

The Cowboys talk is coming up now. Top of the hour and they teased it along for an hour. It's how it's done. Has nothing to do with any bias by the network.

As for some of the mo-mo's on the set, that's another story.

If we lost, it would be the first segment.

 

[viman96]

Faulk still taking the position the Cowboys have not proved anything. Which is not surprising because that is his MO when it comes to Dallas.

 

[FLcowboy]

I watched the NFL channel a lot this weekend, which I don't normally do. Everybody was on Faulk's case, and he just sat there with a smug look. They finally got to the segment where they had to make their picks, he hemmed and hawed until he finally picked Dallas. Even Sapp made fun of him, although Sapp picked the Eagles I believe. I'll watch it later this week to see how they fantasize about Minnesota, but I won't put much stock into Faulk's comments.

 

[Don Corleone]

Marshall Fraud: "The Cowboy are the hottest team in the NFC, but not the best team. The best team is the 1st seed."

 

[StylisticS]

Losing three in a row ending the season is still good for a team? We heard this mess after they lost to Dallas and we're still hearing this when they lose two more games after that? Laughable.

 

[StylisticS]

Unprofessional is exactly right. You can also add a lack of credibility when pure bias seeps into analysis. How does this get by the producers there. I've heard guys talk about how the on-air personalities are starting to call these guys out, namely Irvin and Rich Eisen. I think someone posted this weekend Rich Eisen saying to Marshall Faulk after his pre-game rant..."What is wrong with you today?"

For as much as the Yankees are hated or the Lakers, do ever hear analysis on ESPN's baseball or basketball teams get skewed because of personal feelings?

Last two examples. John Clayton in early December on the Cowboys chances down the stretch. "They are going to be in trouble when one of their offensive lineman go down." Brilliant - a "what if" scenario. By the way this was before Columbo got hurt.

Second - Linda Cohen wrote a blog entitled..."Oh No Cowboy Fans - Tony Romo's in Vegas!"

I absolutely blasted her in the comment section below her piece with the facts of that trip. Have not heard a peep from her since about the Cowboys.

Good point. You won't hear NBATV analysts dog the Lakers unless they need to be dogged. Same thing with the MLB Network when it comes to the Yankees and MLB Network puts the NFL Network to shame sadly. Don't care to hear anyone say that these teams are more hated than the Cowboys.