NFL owners approve international games during regular season

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,652
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
By BRETT MARTEL, AP Sports Writer
October 24, 2006

NEW ORLEANS (AP) -- The NFL will play as many as two regular-season games per year outside the United States starting in 2007, with Mexico, Canada, England and Germany as possible sites for starters.

The plan, first announced last month, was approved Tuesday at the recommendation of new commissioner Roger Goodell, who said the benefits of reaching an international audience outweighed the loss of some teams' home games.

ADVERTISEMENT



"We are talking about a limited number of games that we think will have a tremendous impact," Goodell said. "It's in response to the growing fan interest in our game overseas. There are more and more fans on a global basis."

Mark Waller, senior vice president of NFL International, said the league expected to schedule only one overseas game in 2007.

No specific sites were given for the games. However, Waller said the league hoped to announce the first site by this coming Super Bowl, while the teams would be selected later.

"Germany has a large number of sites as it's just done the World Cup. UK has a significant number of great sites," Waller said. "We know the sites in Mexico and Canada, so there's no shortage of venues that are interested in these games."

The plan would be set up so that teams would rotate over a 16-year period, with each team playing outside the country twice over that span, once as a visitor, the other as a home team. That means a team would lose one home team during that span.

"Obviously the league's going to work out the economics and if we lose a home game, we'll get compensated," said Pat Bowlen, owner of the Denver Broncos. "We're comfortable with it. Obviously we'd like to play in Mexico or Canada and not have to travel to Europe and that's probably the way it would be set up because of our location. But as far as the league's concerned, I think it's a great idea."

In 2005, the NFL staged its first regular-season game outside the United States when the Arizona Cardinals hosted the San Francisco 49ers in Mexico City. A crowd of 103,467 flocked to Azteca Stadium, the largest crowd for a regular-season game in NFL history.

The league also has played numerous exhibition games overseas for the past two decades. The New England Patriots and Seattle Seahawks will play a preseason game next August in Beijing.

Waller said the international popularity of certain teams would not necessarily determine who goes abroad. He said people in foreign markets were more concerned with simply hosting a regular season game, rather than exhibitions in which the best players tend see little action.

"The overwhelming preference is the game itself," Waller said.

NFL games regularly have been televised live in Mexico and Canada and more recently in Europe, notably Britain.

The owners also voted to take the league's Web site, NFL.com, in-house after allowing CBS SportsLine to operate it for the past five years. The league plans to relaunch the site next spring with the help of other league-owned media such as NFL Films and the NFL Network.

The visit to New Orleans was a short one as most owners arrived either Monday night or Tuesday morning and left Tuesday evening.

Former NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue, before he officially left the job over the summer, had called for the regularly scheduled October meetings to be held in New Orleans as part of the league's show of support for the city as it rebuilds from Hurricane Katrina.

Owners and the commissioner said they have marveled at the repairs made to the Louisiana Superdome in less than a year and praised area fans for selling out the Saints' home stadium for the whole season.

However, Saints owner Tom Benson, while pleased with the progress, said the Saints still have nearly 30 of 137 suites in the Superdome unsold and added that his team lagged behind others in corporate sponsorships.

"Our hospitality industry especially needs to come forward," he said. "I don't want to finger-point or anything, but we have to work together in order to make this thing successful.

"The long-term market, nobody can tell right now," Benson continued. "But a year ago, before Katrina, we weren't quite sure and look what we've done. There's no telling what could happen."

As for when New Orleans, which has hosted nine Super Bowls, might get its first since 2002, team owners were optimistic but noncommittal.

"I don't know about the next Super Bowl in line, but obviously New Orleans has always been a great place to host Super Bowls," Denver Broncos owner Pat Bowlen said. "I'd expect you'd see more."

Goodell said the bidding process for the 2011 Super Bowl will begin soon with a decision hopefully made by the next owners' meeting, slated for March in Scottsdale, Ariz.

The Saints' lease in the Superdome ends that same season. So without an extension, the league would risk the awkward situation of placing a Super Bowl in a city that is in the process of losing its NFL franchise.

Proposals for a stadium in Los Angeles, often cited as a possible future home for the Saints or another small-market team, was discussed, but there was no substantial progress made.

One increasing concern is projected construction costs now escalating in the range of $1 billion. That makes the project less attractive to the league unless public funding or a possible outside investor materializes, owners said.

"At this meeting, I don't think (NFL owners) were prepared to pay that for Los Angeles' stadium," Benson said.

LINK
 

BAZ

Drunken Mick
Messages
4,861
Reaction score
2,767
Even as filthy foreign scum, I'm not to happy with this. If it doesn't go according to plan then it could be cut short and mean every team would not have to go through with it. I don't think you can call it fair to travel to another country for an important playoff berth deciding game. Also players who are still playing injured are away from team rehab facilities. Are teams going to lose two practice days because they are on planes? Why does the NFL have to try this, no other sport does.
 

Yeagermeister

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,629
Reaction score
117
I can see it now. We'll be sent to Germany the Sunday before Thanksgiving giving us no time to rest or practice.
 

SultanOfSix

Star Power
Messages
12,957
Reaction score
8,174
Horrendous idea. Obviously, this is all about generating more money. Which stills makes it a horrendous idea.
 

J-DOG

Active Member
Messages
2,135
Reaction score
0
This is the dumbest idea yet.

Why are they doing this? It makes no sense.

The NBA does it and where are they in the TV contracts????behind the NFL, College Football, Nascar and probably even MLB.

The NFL doesn't need international dollars...they are number one easily in revenue and doing this smacks of greediness.
 

BAZ

Drunken Mick
Messages
4,861
Reaction score
2,767
J-DOG;1115381 said:
This is the dumbest idea yet.

Why are they doing this? It makes no sense.

The NBA does it and where are they in the TV contracts????behind the NFL, College Football, Nascar and probably even MLB.

The NFL doesn't need international dollars...they are number one easily in revenue and doing this smacks of greediness.

The NBA doesn't do it with regualar season games do they?
 

StanleySpadowski

Active Member
Messages
4,815
Reaction score
0
Face it, the American market is almost tapped out. Far and away the most popular US sport, where are they going to get addtional fans and the revenue they generate. It isn't from converting more Americans into fans.

This is a $$$ deal plain and simple.

Besides, football's not the only sport to try to capitalize on foreign cash. Nascar ran in Mexico, MLB took part in the World Baseball Championships.


They should really push even harder into Mexico though. Poor economy but enough population and transmigration to result in some serious cash and inroads into other Latin American countries.
 

Billy Bullocks

Active Member
Messages
4,098
Reaction score
22
If foreing fans want to see an NFL game, fly over here. I don't demand that international soccer teams come here for my enjoyment.
 

Cochese

Benched
Messages
7,360
Reaction score
0
Billy Bullocks;1115399 said:
If foreing fans want to see an NFL game, fly over here. I don't demand that international soccer teams come here for my enjoyment.


Alot of them do come over here though, but the key difference is that they do it as a part of a pre-season warmup.

Regular season NFL games on another continent is absurd. The travel, the jet-lag, the time difference, I just dont see how anyone can see this as a good idea.
 

J-DOG

Active Member
Messages
2,135
Reaction score
0
BAZ;1115392 said:
The NBA doesn't do it with regualar season games do they?
Yes they do.
At the first of every season they have at least 2 teams at some friggin place like Japan or somewhere like that playing for like 2 games.

But that doesn't really affect the home game gate when you have so many games as the NBA and MLB have.

These owners have 8 home games guaranteed (unless you are the Saints:rolleyes: ) and that's it.

Not that you should feel sorry for the owners they are making money hand over fist with the TV contracts that the networks ante up every contract time.

The NFL fans are the real loser in this news. How would you like if we played in Japan instead of Dallas during the regular season? It's stupid.
 

Billy Bullocks

Active Member
Messages
4,098
Reaction score
22
JustSayNotoTO;1115400 said:
Alot of them do come over here though, but the key difference is that they do it as a part of a pre-season warmup.

Regular season NFL games on another continent is absurd. The travel, the jet-lag, the time difference, I just dont see how anyone can see this as a good idea.

This I know.

NFL has payed games in Japan and Mexico, preseason as well, if Im correct. This is ok. Im talking regular season matchup.


Give me Chelsea Barcelona in a US venue, and I would go. But I dont demand they come over here just because people would go.
 

tecolote

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,038
Reaction score
1,196
I´m from Mexico, obviously soccer is king here, but the NFL is huge, we get the NFL Network and Sunday Ticket (thank god) with the country´s largest satellite TV provider. Plus games on open TV.

Sports Books (sports betting is legal throughout Mexico) make a killing with the NFL, they are regularly packed in sundays and mondays.

We´ve had about 5 or 6 preseason games and one regular season game here, all sellouts in a 110,000 seat stadium, and of course the Cowboys own Mexico.

Having said that, I don´t think this is a good idea, there are other ways the NFL could expand, there are only 8 home games in a regular season, imagine if they took a home game away in Dallas. Fans would not be very happy.

Why mess with that.
 

utrunner07

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,326
Reaction score
262
I am so sick of the NFL! Its becoming all about the money! This is rediculous and should not have even been considered for so many reasons as have been stated previous. I am becoming less and less of an NFL fan every year, pretty soon I doubt I'll care, I miss the good old days.
 

BAZ

Drunken Mick
Messages
4,861
Reaction score
2,767
J-DOG;1115403 said:
The NFL fans are the real loser in this news. How would you like if we played in Japan instead of Dallas during the regular season? It's stupid.

Well I lived in Japan for a while and plan on moving back so it wouldn't be to ba..........no I agree with you it's horrible in every way. Also depending on the location and the teams playing tickets sales would vary greatly. When the Falcons and Colts played in the Tokyo Dome it was a sell out because everybody wants to see Vick and Manning. Ten years ago when the had it in Dublin the stadium wasn't even a third full. Obviously it depends on the country, but two poor teams playing could hurt ticket sales a lot and look very bad on TV.
 

peplaw06

That Guy
Messages
13,699
Reaction score
413
I don't like the idea either.

1) I don't see the big money draw. Sure fans will buy tickets over there, but will it be as many fans as they're losing by not playing the game in the States? The stadiums over there may be bigger, but will they fill them?

2) The televising of whatever game is overseas will be at some odd hour, thus losing television ratings also for whatever teams are gone, not to mention the inconvenience it will be for the diehards to watch.

3) the jet lag issue is a big one. I can only imagine whatever teams are forced to travel will get a Bye week before or after the game. That seems to offset it a little bit, but is it enough?

Other sports have tried this IIRC. I'm positive MLB has played a series in Japan to open the season. It's been done at the beginning of the season and the teams have gotten 3 days or so off before they play again in the states. NBA I believe has done preseason games only in Asia.

I see the interest in making the game more of a global game, but I don't think it will work for a number of reasons. They don't play football in other countries. You're trying to force a sport on them that they don't play. At least NBA and MLB milked a market where the fans already knew a lot about the sport, and many played it themselves.

I'd think if foreign markets were going to start playing American football, they would have already started doing that.
 

stag hunter

Hater
Messages
612
Reaction score
9
I think it's a great idea. Great way to showcase the game to other countries and for the game to spread internationally.

For everyone whining about jet lag or having to be on a plane for an extra few hours: SUCK IT UP. I guess we should take away the thanksgiving game too because thats an unfair disadvantage? What about the monday night games? The fact that the NFL owners unanimously approved the proposal tells me that they aren't too concerned about it. Everyone wants to b**** about the rules changes to protect the players, but are up in arms at the prospect of professional athletes having to endure an extra 6 hours of First Class plane travel.
 

Cochese

Benched
Messages
7,360
Reaction score
0
stag hunter;1115575 said:
I think it's a great idea. Great way to showcase the game to other countries and for the game to spread internationally.

For everyone whining about jet lag or having to be on a plane for an extra few hours: SUCK IT UP. I guess we should take away the thanksgiving game too because thats an unfair disadvantage? What about the monday night games? The fact that the NFL owners unanimously approved the proposal tells me that they aren't too concerned about it. Everyone wants to b**** about the rules changes to protect the players, but are up in arms at the prospect of professional athletes having to endure an extra 6 hours of First Class plane travel.

I guarantee the first time the Cowboys have to travel half way around the world to play a football game, you will be one of the first people on here complaining about it.
 

SkinsandTerps

Commanders Forever
Messages
7,627
Reaction score
125
Pitiful Idea for the Regular season.

I would rather they send 8 teams overseas for preseason, and those teams can play all of their pre-season games there.

To take regular season games away from the major fanbase is just BS.

The biggest problem is that the most popular teams will have to do it at some point. They will start out with smaller markets losing home games, but after a while the larger market teams will lose games too.

This is garbage.

Prediction : Next season overseas potential games... Bills vs. Jags, Tennessee vs. Oakland, or Ravens Vs. Arizona.
 

Zaxor

Virtus Mille Scuta
Messages
8,406
Reaction score
38
Well if the Cowboys play in Germany...I won't mind not one little bit:)
 
Top