NFL Passing Leaders In 2019 Without Garbage Time

[jrumann59]

So down 14 you believe should've been the criteria? Even though stats say the game isn't out of reach down 14?

Garbage time is a fluid term in my opinion. Some offenses being down 14 puts the game out of reach. There were games last year that that there was never any doubt they could comeback due to how inept the offense was. Jets game was full of garbage time. and there is the inverse what about games you are so far ahead and the other team something dumb like can't tackle

 

[weaver21]

I've never seen a fanbase so split on a player in my entire life. Not even Romo was this bad. You can't even debate with people anymore on Dak because the "haters" are calling him a scrub and the "lovers" are calling him a top 5 quarterback. There's no medium when discussing Dak. People are so desperate to prove their point, regardless if it's defending him or criticizing him.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

I'd prefer not to argue with anyone and we've debated Dakota to death, but its still amusing to see the lengths some will go to in promoting a player that not even officially on the team any more.

Yet he's currently counting against our salary cap.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Garbage time is a fluid term in my opinion. Some offenses being down 14 puts the game out of reach. There were games last year that that there was never any doubt they could comeback due to how inept the offense was. Jets game was full of garbage time. and there is the inverse what about games you are so far ahead and the other team something dumb like can't tackle

I mean this is subjective. If you ask a coach they are going to tell you the game isn't over until its over. Now realistically I can say if you are down 28 points anytime of the game? Game is over. Down 14 points should not be over. You are a stop away from getting back into the game.

 

[superonyx]

That is a good point. I'm looking I don't see any games where the Chiefs beat anyone 45-10...was that this year?

Well they were up 21 on 3 teams last year before I got bored and stopped looking,

so explain how up 21 isn’t garbage time but down 21 is?

you can’t.

 

[Ranched]

I miss the non-diva's.

 

[ChronicCowboy]

So Dak gets all his years in garbage time
Yet a chart showing his yards without garbage time asinine
Gotcha

I never said anything like that. You pumpers think everyone that criticizes Dak must hate him. How about thinking he’s above average? Is that not ok?

 

[fivetwos]

Like him, dont like him. Whatever.

There isnt anything close to a better alternative and no way anyone could map out a path to one right now.

All very moot because he isnt not going to be here.

 

[QuincyCarterEra]

I'd prefer not to argue with anyone and we've debated Dakota to death, but its still amusing to see the lengths some will go to in promoting a player that not even officially on the team any more.

I agree. The lengths the trolls have to go to are so much worse than the promoters.
Trolls- Dak only puts up stats in garbage time
Promoter- Here's a stat disproving that
Trolls- oh my gosh what a reach *inserts lame gif*

Then they have to completely lie like you did in the other thread to make a fake Dalton vs Dak controversy from Rocy's perspectivd.

It's just so sad that there's a whole group of posters willing to look this uneducated.

 

[ChronicCowboy]

Lol pretty moronic response by you.

The list isn't listing the best QBs in the league, it is disproving a stupid lie Dak detractors use in that Dak just compiled his stats in garbage time. The fact you didn't understand that is pretty damning.

The entire premise of the chart is asinine. It’s a completely cherry picked scenario. Nothing about it proves that Dak is any more ready to lead us to a Super Bowl. The Dak fanatics on this message board have lost their minds. It’s like you all know the guy personally or something.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

You're right on that. Peyton Manning was down by 21 point with a little less than 4 minutes left and tied that game up and won it in OT 38-35.
.

Right. And it happens. Granted there's no correct way to tell what exactly "Garbage time" is. Even it he Packers game last year......people will say Dak boosted his stats but that game wasn't finished in the 3rd quarter.

 

[QuincyCarterEra]

The entire premise of the chart is asinine. It’s a completely cherry picked scenario. Nothing about it proves that Dak is any more ready to lead us to a Super Bowl. The Dak fanatics on this message board have lost their minds. It’s like you all know the guy personally or something.

What's your definition of garbage time

And the OP didn't even cherry pick the stats lmao. It wasn't made with the intent to boost Dak, it was made by a 3rd party of god knows which fandom.

It wasn't meant to say he was more ready to take us to the SB, STILL the fact you don't understand that is asinine(since you like the word so much).

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

The entire premise of the chart is asinine. It’s a completely cherry picked scenario. Nothing about it proves that Dak is any more ready to lead us to a Super Bowl. The Dak fanatics on this message board have lost their minds. It’s like you all know the guy personally or something.

But that's the thing...it wasn't suppose to prove Dak was ready to lead us to a Super Bowl lol.

 

[Blake]

And yet I never create posts, I just respond to them, and here you are creating a post with an unsourced image created in Microsoft Paint with the only intent to rile people up. Literally textbook troll behavior.

If you think that graphic was created in MS Paint, you really are a boomer.

 

[ChronicCowboy]

But that's the thing...it wasn't suppose to prove Dak was ready to lead us to a Super Bowl lol.

So what was the point? Wasting everyone’s time like you usually do with your Dak obsession?

 

[Super_Kazuya]

Right. And it happens. Granted there's no correct way to tell what exactly "Garbage time" is. Even it he Packers game last year......people will say Dak boosted his stats but that game wasn't finished in the 3rd quarter.

The Packers were ahead 31-3 (in your own trolling above you literally said a game is over if you're down 28 points) and their win probability was 99% at the time. You can't even get your own trolling down.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

I've never seen a fanbase so split on a player in my entire life. Not even Romo was this bad. You can't even debate with people anymore on Dak because the "haters" are calling him a scrub and the "lovers" are calling him a top 5 quarterback. There's no medium when discussing Dak. People are so desperate to prove their point, regardless if it's defending him or criticizing him.

Never seen anyone call him a top 5 quarterback.....news to me.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

The Packers were ahead 31-3 (in your own trolling above you literally said a game is over if you're down 28 points) and their win probability was 99% at the time. You can't even get your own trolling down.

I asked you how was your Mother's Day?

 

[gjkoeppen]

The entire premise of the chart is asinine. It’s a completely cherry picked scenario. Nothing about it proves that Dak is any more ready to lead us to a Super Bowl. The Dak fanatics on this message board have lost their minds. It’s like you all know the guy personally or something.

Gee if people looked at Trent Dilffer and said the ravens had no chance of winning a Super Bowl they would have looked foolish. The raven did win despite having Dilffer but also having the top NFL record setting defense.
.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Well they were up 21 on 3 teams last year before I got bored and stopped looking,

so explain how up 21 isn’t garbage time but down 21 is?

you can’t.

So you made up them being up 45-10 on the Bengals........ok so tell me these games they were up 21 points and I'll look into this for you.