CFZ NFL Salary Cap Solution

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
Perhaps the NBA has a legitimate solution to the salary cap era of the NFL.

As it stands there is a soft cap for the NBA. Teams can pay up to that cap without any financial penalty.

There is what is called the Larry Byrd rule, which allows a team to pay a player who is currently on the team a salary which pushes the franchise over the cap.

Finally there is a two tiered system wherein the team over the cap may continue to pay higher salaries, and the two tiers are essentially two distinct penalties factored in a dollar amount. The first is 1.50 and the second is 4.75 above the cap at a per dollar cost. The money gleaned from these penalties is distributed to the other owners and players who stay under the cap.

The NBA salary cap, as of last year was 123.665 million.

If I understand this it works this way.

Let's say the cap with the NFL is 190 million. Teams can safely stay under that dollar amount.

The Byrd rule, which surely would be called something else - I prefer The Goodell Is An Egg Sucking Dog Rule - would allow teams to pay up to 224.8 million, which allows them to pay a QB without penalty.

Finally, teams can exceed the 224.8 million at a penalty price.

Let's say Team A has exceeded the soft cap of 190 million, then added another 34.8 million to retain their QB. This puts them at the 224.8 million threshold. They have heavily played the free agent market and spent an extra amount which surpasses that amount and is paying 250 million in salary.

The extra 25.2 million would be taxed at 1.75 dollars to the tune of another 44.1 million dollars. This would mean the salary of this team would be 190 million soft cap, plus 34.8 million Goodell Wears Lacy Panties cap, plus 25.2 exceeding the second level of the cap, plus an additional 44.1 million.

This money would be distributed to teams in softer markets who cannot afford to exceed the cap.

190 million soft cap
34.8 million Goodell is a mouth breather cap
25.2 million over spent above secondary cap
44.1 million penalty tax distributed among players and owners
Equals 294.1 million for one year

Now I do not pretend to be a capologist, but the price of QB's is headed to a point where teams will invest so much in one position - with the fallacy that the QB is the only reason a team wins....think not, read the posts here to validate that frame of mind - and then you will see the have's and have not's in the league where a guy is playing for peanuts so the team can pay one player 65 million a year.

The upheaval this creates reminds me of the Great Depression - no I did not live through that time - that there will be a crash and the league will turn into something unrecognizable as the have not's strike every year, and this turns in to the league surfing the crap tide.

I believe I can point to one owner who looks remarkably like Skeletor that would pay whatever it cost to win a Super Bowl to show the entire football world he is a football guy.

I understand there are some swank pawn shops that give pay day loans on yachts.

Thoughts?
Only thing the owners have a prayer of getting it through the NFLPA is reducing the max that can be paid to one player by a percentage. Say 20% of the cap. This would reduce the salaries of QB's and open up salaries for the other positions. But I highly doubt they would agree to anything like that.
 

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,859
Reaction score
26,550
Perhaps the NBA has a legitimate solution to the salary cap era of the NFL.

As it stands there is a soft cap for the NBA. Teams can pay up to that cap without any financial penalty.

There is what is called the Larry Byrd rule, which allows a team to pay a player who is currently on the team a salary which pushes the franchise over the cap.

Finally there is a two tiered system wherein the team over the cap may continue to pay higher salaries, and the two tiers are essentially two distinct penalties factored in a dollar amount. The first is 1.50 and the second is 4.75 above the cap at a per dollar cost. The money gleaned from these penalties is distributed to the other owners and players who stay under the cap.

The NBA salary cap, as of last year was 123.665 million.

If I understand this it works this way.

Let's say the cap with the NFL is 190 million. Teams can safely stay under that dollar amount.

The Byrd rule, which surely would be called something else - I prefer The Goodell Is An Egg Sucking Dog Rule - would allow teams to pay up to 224.8 million, which allows them to pay a QB without penalty.

Finally, teams can exceed the 224.8 million at a penalty price.

Let's say Team A has exceeded the soft cap of 190 million, then added another 34.8 million to retain their QB. This puts them at the 224.8 million threshold. They have heavily played the free agent market and spent an extra amount which surpasses that amount and is paying 250 million in salary.

The extra 25.2 million would be taxed at 1.75 dollars to the tune of another 44.1 million dollars. This would mean the salary of this team would be 190 million soft cap, plus 34.8 million Goodell Wears Lacy Panties cap, plus 25.2 exceeding the second level of the cap, plus an additional 44.1 million.

This money would be distributed to teams in softer markets who cannot afford to exceed the cap.

190 million soft cap
34.8 million Goodell is a mouth breather cap
25.2 million over spent above secondary cap
44.1 million penalty tax distributed among players and owners
Equals 294.1 million for one year

Now I do not pretend to be a capologist, but the price of QB's is headed to a point where teams will invest so much in one position - with the fallacy that the QB is the only reason a team wins....think not, read the posts here to validate that frame of mind - and then you will see the have's and have not's in the league where a guy is playing for peanuts so the team can pay one player 65 million a year.

The upheaval this creates reminds me of the Great Depression - no I did not live through that time - that there will be a crash and the league will turn into something unrecognizable as the have not's strike every year, and this turns in to the league surfing the crap tide.

I believe I can point to one owner who looks remarkably like Skeletor that would pay whatever it cost to win a Super Bowl to show the entire football world he is a football guy.

I understand there are some swank pawn shops that give pay day loans on yachts.

Thoughts?
Kinda defeats the point. NFL players get a cut of revenue and to get that they agreed to a hard cap. Why would owners want to pay players more of the revenue? The point of the cap is competitive balance and that blows up under a soft cap
 

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,859
Reaction score
26,550
Only thing the owners have a prayer of getting it through the NFLPA is reducing the max that can be paid to one player by a percentage. Say 20% of the cap. This would reduce the salaries of QB's and open up salaries for the other positions. But I highly doubt they would agree to anything like that.
That is something players should love but agents would hate. It raises the pay of the majority of players, so players should be all for it. Though what that would mean is more teams would be paying the max since every QB would want the max
 

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,859
Reaction score
26,550
Don't look now, but the same teams are in the play-offs as is. Transferring tax money to smaller franchises could level that playing field of the got's and the don't got's.
It's flawed, but it's April.
On average about 6 new teams make the playoffs each year and that’s likely to increase going forward with expanded playoffs
 

Hoofbite

Well-Known Member
Messages
40,800
Reaction score
11,440
Probably not. But so much is discussed here that the idea came to me when i read the thread about Parson's getting 30 million.

A pipe dream, maybe. Most likely.

But QB's will end up ruining franchise after franchise.

Just an idea for discussion while we wait out the next draft.
They'll ruin franchise after franchise until they don't, either by playing well enough to justify the cap hit, or by not getting paid as much. In the NBA and to a slightly lesser extent the MLB, you can pay 1 or 2 people maximum amounts. Also, those 2 sports don't really have position-based glass ceilings like the NFL does. The NFL is unique in roster size, position value, and skill diversity. Their cap structure should be best suited to whatever helps the NFL operate to the highest ability with those unique traits.

I don't think there's a problem with the cap. It's pretty straight-forward.
 

Hoofbite

Well-Known Member
Messages
40,800
Reaction score
11,440
Only thing the owners have a prayer of getting it through the NFLPA is reducing the max that can be paid to one player by a percentage. Say 20% of the cap. This would reduce the salaries of QB's and open up salaries for the other positions. But I highly doubt they would agree to anything like that.
The NFLPA is comprised of more than just the top 10 paid QBs. If you are outside of that exclusive circle, you'd probably agree with it.

They can vote on it, and I highly doubt an undrafted free agent rookie is going to think twice about giving Mahommes an extra $50M.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
The NFLPA is comprised of more than just the top 10 paid QBs. If you are outside of that exclusive circle, you'd probably agree with it.

They can vote on it, and I highly doubt an undrafted free agent rookie is going to think twice about giving Mahommes an extra $50M.
Are they smart enough to figure if the qb gets half the money its less for them?
 
Top