Silk hat on a pig
The ratings are down 20% and they lost people that are never coming back
No way to spin it........ even if they are still 1st they still missed all their goals and estimates
Only thing helping is the TV contracts were negotiated years ago and haven't been adjusted yet but they had to give a record number or buy backs and multiple airings to unhappy ad customers
Here's one negotiated earlier this year. A 5-year, $3 Billion deal for Thursday Night Football by Fox Sports. $60 Million per game, up from the previous deal's $45 Million per game rate.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/31/fox...nfl-to-broadcast-thursday-night-football.html
And the foot-stamping, drama queens probably never even left in the first place.
The NFL made the most money it ever has of off TV last year.You can't compare programming numbers to network numbers. Now if you can add those numbers of people that cut the cord that streamed the NFL instead of watching it to the network numbers, it would give an accurate number.
But just because networks lost more viewers than NFL programming - it doesn't equate to a net increase. It only means that more people abandoned the networks for alternate programming than there were people that abandoned the NFL for alternate programming. It is still a decline until they can factor in an increase that offsets it from non-traditional NFL viewing sources.
Just because a network is lower doesn't mean the programming is lower. For example, "This is Us" on NBC was up 17% despite overall viewership of NBC being down by 19%.
Not good for whom?Ad spending was down 1.2%....... not good
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...-back-on-nfl-spending-amid-tv-ratings-decline
exactly.Here's one negotiated earlier this year. A 5-year, $3 Billion deal for Thursday Night Football by Fox Sports. $60 Million per game, up from the previous deal's $45 Million per game rate.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/31/fox...nfl-to-broadcast-thursday-night-football.html
And the foot-stamping, drama queens probably never even left in the first place.
Its ad revenues dropped by 1.2% last yearThe NFL made the most money it ever has of off TV last year.
You are letting entertainment media fool you.Its ad revenues dropped by 1.2% last year
They had to run duplicate commercials to placate their sponsors and had to give rebates
That is not what you are describing
The Networks make money thru the adsYou are letting entertainment media fool you.
The NFL is not a Media business selling ADs EXCEPT the NFL Network which was always an expense as an advertising arm not a money maker.
The NFL made more money last year than ever before on TV and it will again this year.
Again easiest way to prove your theory is simply go away.
No one really does.
It's like liberals boycotting chick fil a... then why is the line always so friggin long.
vs contracts up 20%?Ad spending was down 1.2%....... not good
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...-back-on-nfl-spending-amid-tv-ratings-decline
The packages weren't identical and if things were so good why did NBC pass on even making a competitive bid.......because they lost their shirt on the last dealvs contracts up 20%?
In keeping with CZ rules, I’ve eliminated any and all political or protest references from the article’s text.
___________________________________________________
Here are some facts: The NFL’s ratings declined 9% in 2017, and 8% in 2016. In the prized 18-45 demographic, the NFL declined 12% in 2017. Here’s how some TV networks you probably watch—or used to watch—fared in 2017, according to Nielsen 18-49 data:
...and so on. (ESPN, you’ll recall, actually gained a few viewers.) There were nearly 500 scripted series aired on U.S. TV in 2017, more than double the number that aired in 2009.Netflix, Amazon Prime, and Hulu are driving this massive increase in available programming, and nearly every broadcast network is taking it on the chin as a result. Overall, broadcast networks lost 16% of their viewers in 2017; cable networks lost 11%. And that’s using Nielsen’s “C3" ratings formula, which counts DVR viewings. The NFL only lost 9%.
- NBC: down 19%
- Fox: down 8%
- CBS: down 19%
- ABC: down 15%
- Univision: down 18%
- CW: down 15%
- TBS: down 11%
- Adult Swim: down 16%
- AMC: down 20%
- FX: down 14%
- Food Network: down 10%
- Lifetime: down 21%
- Comedy Central: down 18%
- Spike TV: down 24%
- Disney Channel: down 24%
- E!: down 18%
The NFL’s ratings have fallen substantially less than TV as a whole. Indeed, Sunday Night Football remained the highest-rated show for the seventh straight season. Ten years ago, it didn’t even crack the top 10. Monday Night Football’s viewership fell, but only by 3%.
Are NFL ratings down? Yes, but only if you don’t compensate for the overall decline in TV viewers due to streaming services, et cetera. If you do compensate for the overall decline in TV viewers, NFL ratings are up.
The NFL’s share of a rapidly-shrinking TV audience grew in 2016, and it grew by an even larger amount in 2017. As a percentage of people who are watching television, the NFL is commanding its biggest audience in the history of the league.
I’ll repeat it:
- Broadcast TV networks lost 16% of their viewers,
- Cable networks lost 11% of their viewers,
- The NFL lost 9% of its viewers.
ROFL, you are tilting at windmills here.The packages weren't identical and if things were so good why did NBC pass on even making a competitive bid.......because they lost their shirt on the last deal
ROFL, you are tilting at windmills here.
NFL content is more valuable than ever.
Fox blew NBC/CBS out of the water with a 60M per game offer, up 33% from the deal 2 years prior during which "erosion" was said to occur.
NBC stated they wanted to maintain the same rate and not go higher.
But with unique NFL content only one buyer needs to set the market and Fox did.
Murdoch could care less about your ratings whines. He knows he built an empire off of the NFL lead-ins.
They went from a distant 4th network to most watched.
