Bingo, CJ won the lottery with his last contract because rookie salaries were uncapped at that time and while I understand agents desire to shoot for the moon, CJs terms are a non starter imo.
Unfortunately for Dez, etc, they are currently bound by terms that no longer over-inflate their salaries and if I was making the decisions, I'd hold firm on reasonable terms: I'd guarantee $30+ million now and add more guarantees down the road if Dez stays healthy and continues to perform at a high level. Even if Dez pouted and sat out, I'd hold firm because I believe its just as important to set a precedent of not caving into players demands because I believe the long term negative consequences of caving in are more destructive than the short term benefits of getting the player back on the field.
Risk needs to be more balanced (Miami will be completely screwed if Suh has a career ending injury in training camp that will take years to absorb). I don't think its fair to the team to have to incur 100% of the risk, so if the player wants a lot of guarantees, then he's got to give in other areas. Tough **** if there is a franchise tag that keeps them from receiving a max contract, I'd have zero sympathy for a player set to receive $29M guaranteed over 2 years.
I wish I knew what the real hang up is in getting this done, I find it hard to believe its simply over a few dollars. No matter what deal finally gets done, the risk is always on the team in the early parts of a contract, its only after the player has stayed healthy and continues to play at a high level does the risk start to balance out.
I fully agree. If Dez and his agent have an issue with the franchise tag take it up with the union. Getting paid the avg of the top 5 is a lot of money even if it is 1 year. Meantime Dallas is not opposed to getting a long term deal done, it does benefit the Cowboys as well to have a long term deal. I think these deals give teams flexibility that the tag does not give.
The problem is that the Franchise Tag-based contract is a pre-set pre-determined agreement between the NFLPA and NFL. Meaning, if no new contract is signed to replace that, that in itself cannot be contested because it was already legally agreed to by the union and the NFL. That's my point. If the NFLPA really wants to claim collusion, collusion can only happen if a new "tainted" contract is offered (which has happened) and is signed (which has not happened) and there is no other "non-approved" contract on the table.
From a legal standpoint, if no new contract is signed and the pre-agreed-to-by-both-sides franchise offer is on the table, collusion is not possible all because there is a valid, non-debatable contract offer on the table (franchise tag). If there was no CBA preset franchise contract, then collusion would be possible without signing a contract. In fact, if the Cowboys really want to CYA themselves, they just need to pull the contract off the table right before the time frame for signing a new contract ends. Then technically, the franchise contract would be the only contract offer in play and, as I pointed out, it was agreed to by the NFLPA and NFL via CBA so there would be no debating its validity.
Agreed, I also see value in the flexibility that using the franchise tag this year and next year gives the team, especially if Dez's salary and guarantees are as much or more than the $29M he would be paid this year and next under the tag.
Those two years correspond nicely with the likely remaining window of Romo and if he happens to be done at the end of next season, then I'd prefer to invest my cap dollars in my young line than a 28 year old receiver with no franchise QB to get him the ball.
On the other hand, if Dez goes on a Jerry Rice like run and plays until he is 40, then I will be making a mistake but I still have the option of the tag for the third year (unlikely due to the crazy cost) or negotiating a new contract with him at that end of 2016.
Its a tough call and teams better know who their dealing with very well when locking up a roster spot and tons of cap dollars on one player in a league that has been watered down by free agency.
It is? What law does that fall under?
I brought up the television money because he was comparing what players make now, compared to what players like Irvin made. The salary cap is higher now than it was in the 90's. Why? Because of television revenue. It's like talking about that people make $15 minimum wage now, and crying about just 30 years ago it was $3.35.
As far as being more marketable because of the star go's. That's not true anymore. Guys like Russell Wilson, Andrew Luck, Marcus Mariotta, Watt, Suh, Lynch, ODB, etc. are all just as marketable where they are as they would be in Dallas. Dez will sell as many jerseys, have his name on the same amount of shoes, and be in as many commercials regardless of where he plays. Hopefully that changes again, but it will take a few more years like last year, if we want the Star to be as relevant as it used to be.
I don't worry so much about Romo window, I think a big key for a young QB is to have the weapons in place so that he is not forced to come in and try to win it by himself. I think the longterm deals gives a team flexibility to restructure contracts to that room can be made just as Romo has restructured his as well as others on the team. I think most young QB fail because they end up on teams will little talent around them and are asked to do too much too soon. I think looking at Russell Wilson he came in as a rookie and did not have to carry his team nor does he have to carry them today, he has a talented group around him and as long as he is avoiding big mistakes his team gives him chances to win.
I don't worry so much about Romo window, I think a big key for a young QB is to have the weapons in place so that he is not forced to come in and try to win it by himself. I think the longterm deals gives a team flexibility to restructure contracts to that room can be made just as Romo has restructured his as well as others on the team. I think most young QB fail because they end up on teams will little talent around them and are asked to do too much too soon. I think looking at Russell Wilson he came in as a rookie and did not have to carry his team nor does he have to carry them today, he has a talented group around him and as long as he is avoiding big mistakes his team gives him chances to win.
Thus why I see value in the flexibility of not being locked into Dez at a bad price for long term (love him at reasonable terms). While not having Dez would hurt and I hope it never happens, all is not lost because his loss would free up a ton of cap room to maintain/build that team you talk about around whomever is playing QB
This entire threat is ********. NFLPA is bringing a Water Pistol to a Global Thermal Nuclear Engagement.
So it is OK if players talk behind the curtain to screw teams but it isn't OK for clubs to try and protect their financial interests by negotiating with other teams? This is absurd.
This entire threat is ********. NFLPA is bringing a Water Pistol to a Global Thermal Nuclear Engagement.
the dallas morning news says that if nflpa wins this dez get three times calvin Johnson money is that right
and does it effect the cap if that's true would cripple the cowboys.