No huddle, shotgun

Doomsday101 said:
I'm sure Dallas will run some double TE, however it allows them to keep defenders in the box by spreading them out it forces them to move out some to account for the extra WR. I think Dallas has to mix things up through out the game that we agree on.

I don't agree. You can use motion off the two TE set and force a miss match or a late change to the defensive set. Simply sending Witten in motion to either sideline forces the skins to adjust with a LB or a DB. This set provides so much flexability in that respect, if you have a TE who can execute it. Luckly, we have one. You can use TE motion to dictate coverages. To use as the wham backer or the trap. You can use him to attack the depth of your LBs or against the blitz, off the motion, it's endless. I think it's all about the way you use the two TE set. If you use it to strickly block with, then yeah, it's predictable. Doesn't have to be that way though.
 
Nors said:
If Parcells had any nerve he'd put JJ singleback and spread skins.

3 Wr's and Witten!

While I think we will see a little bit of this, which should be exciting, I would much rather line up and hit them square in the mouth most of the game.

Beat them down physically! Old Fashioned domination.

It is just more fun that way for me.

It will be hot tonight, we have a lot of depth on the D-Line, we are in really good physical condition.

Just like a 12 round championship fight. Slugging hard blows for the first 9 or 10 rounds, and then KNOCK THEM OUT!

Take away their manhood.

That is what I want to see!

There will be times for what you are talking about though!
 
I think we will take the sack straight out the gate just to get it out of the way. ha Then bust a double reverse from julius to crayton and let hem fire it down field to Glenn! This will break their spirit and then just kick back and run the rest of the night.
 
Doomsday101 said:
No Witten still lines up in his normal alignment, but by going double TE it allows the defense to bring up the extra defender as well. add the 3 WR it forces them to account for the WR. Roll your eyes all you want frankly I'm sick of seeing rolling eyes **** you have something to say then say it.

First, this entire thread is not about strategy it about causes. We spread/no huddle it becomes Bledsoe's offense and forces Price into the rotation. Very transparent.

Second, we run 3 wide all the time out of 2 TE. We split Witten out to WR using him where he is best, keeping Campbell where he is best as a blocker.

Third, the most likely formation we will see tonight is our bunch formation that we used at the end of preseason. It gives us multiple receivers that can flood an area in layers. It can pick up the blitzers easier. We can attack the edges out of it, without exposing us to the blitz. We can motion out of it wide to get a pre-snap read.
 
I expect to see some no huddle but ZERO 4 WR sets...

We can use no huddle to deal with Williams pkgs and give him less time to call/change blitzes...

I don't like one back sets...I think Polite is a good blocker, but he better be better at picking up the blitz...

I expect ALOT of pressure brought around Petite...They will FORCE him to make the right read...

Just as alot of our pressure should be around Jensen...

Lets go get some SKINS! :cool:
 
Listening to D. Bledsoe in a taped interview last night, he stated that everyone has the misconception that BP is a conservative "run the ball" coach. Drew said that during his early years with BP, BP had him throwing it all over the field. I think he mentioned how many passing records he set during his years with BP. So, don't be surprised if BP's apparant reluctance to start Price is a ploy. Don't be surprised if we start out in a spread offense with 3 receivers, and JJ alone in the backfield. If we can get up on them early doing this, then we can give them a heavy dose of our running game, in order to eat up the clock.
 
blindzebra said:
First, this entire thread is not about strategy it about causes. We spread/no huddle it becomes Bledsoe's offense and forces Price into the rotation. Very transparent.

Second, we run 3 wide all the time out of 2 TE. We split Witten out to WR using him where he is best, keeping Campbell where he is best as a blocker.

Third, the most likely formation we will see tonight is our bunch formation that we used at the end of preseason. It gives us multiple receivers that can flood an area in layers. It can pick up the blitzers easier. We can attack the edges out of it, without exposing us to the blitz. We can motion out of it wide to get a pre-snap read.

I said 3 WR that can be Key,Glenn and Crayton so Price is not figuring into this. You keep Witten in the lineup and go single back, heck Dallas runs it now I just think we may run it a bit more on an overly aggressive team. Stacking guys up with a 2 TE sets allows the defense to also bring up the extra man because they don't have the 3rd WR to take into account.
 
Where were all you "Offensive Coordinators" When Campo was in town and he hired Bruce Coslett?
You guys should have applied!!:rolleyes:
 
bsheeern said:
Where were all you "Offensive Coordinators" When Campo was in town and he hired Bruce Coslett?
You guys should have applied!!:rolleyes:


You assume we didn't?
 
bsheeern said:
Where were all you "Offensive Coordinators" When Campo was in town and he hired Bruce Coslett?
You guys should have applied!!:rolleyes:

I applied they turned me down, they SAID it was because of my complete lack of experience.

I still think it was them trying to keep a middle aged white guy down.
 
blindzebra said:
So we are spreading them and taking Witten out of the passing game to block?

Yep that's much better.:rolleyes:



Block some and release some. Keep the LB's honest.
 
bsheeern said:
Are you admitting to the fact that Bruce got the job over you.:eek::

I am absolutly saying they gave my resume no consideration at all. Sucks for me but there it is.
 
All agendas aside, our best and most versatile package is 2 TE.

We can go one back, pro set, I, offset I, 3 wide, even 4/5 wide without changing personnel.

We can have 2 WR, 2 TE, 1 back.

2 WR, 1 TE, TE/FB, RB in the I, offset I, or pro set.

2 WR, TE/WR, TE, 1 back.

2 WR, TE/WR, TE/FB, RB.

2 WR, 2 TE/WR, 1 back.

2 WR, 1 TE/WR, 1 RB/WR, TE.

2 WR, 2 TE/WR, 1 RB/WR.

That package also fits the bunch formation that we have been using with both WRs tight and an TE in the back field.
 
This week - we need to get very creative. Sitting back in max protection would be a fatal mistake (For Bledsoe)

We need to spread field and get our weapons open field. Get JJ some space and watch YAC today - Price/Glenn should be able to take a few short to intermediate passes yard.
 
Nors said:
This week - we need to get very creative. Sitting back in max protection would be a fatal mistake (For Bledsoe)

We need to spread field and get our weapons open field. Get JJ some space and watch YAC today - Price/Glenn should be able to take a few short to intermediate passes yard.

I agree. I think the 3 WR set and using the draw play with Jones can be very successful.
 
Exactly he likes to use JJ in single back looks and do that draw play. 2 TE's brings a lot of defensive players right into the box.


This will be a good game to watch. Tactics wise to see how Parcells attacks their defense.
 
Nors said:
Exactly he likes to use JJ in single back looks and do that draw play. 2 TE's brings a lot of defensive players right into the box.


This will be a good game to watch. Tactics wise to see how Parcells attacks their defense.

I think Dallas will mix it up tonight but I would expect to see quite a bit of the 3 WR sets, single back formation
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,152
Messages
13,792,651
Members
23,774
Latest member
Dcfiles
Back
Top