I'd feel sorry for Porter and Collins because Owens and Moss would be arguing they aren't getting the ball enough.abersonc said:As long as the Raiders are in the league, TO would have a landing spot.
TO and Moss and Porter. Ouch -- better throw 50 time a game.
Yeagermeister said:I'd feel sorry for Porter and Collins because Owens and Moss would be arguing they aren't getting the ball enough.
abersonc said:As long as the Raiders are in the league, TO would have a landing spot.
TO and Moss and Porter. Ouch -- better throw 50 time a game.
NorthTexan95 said:Actually, when you check it state by state, the best TO gets is in Wisconsin with 40% favorable. That explains why TO said the Eagles would be better with Favre ... it was a sound bite to bring in the all important Wiconsin votes!
:laugh2:NorthTexan95 said:That's a great graphic map! lol And not only is it the United States. If you check the little globe on the lower right it appears all the world's oceans have also voted no to TO. Guess the world's aquatic life doesn't want to be polluted to TO, either.
dbair1967 said:this is the same crap everyone said when Moss landed with the Raiders...and they still stunk...they've been better since he got hurt and was de-emphasized in the game plan...hindsight being 20-20, I bet Norv wishes they'd have never traded for Moss
Moss and Owens are the ultimate team cancers, period.
David