Nolan Smith

morasp

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,440
Reaction score
6,851
I’m more than taken aback by Hutchinson’s stats. I really didn’t think he would do this in the pros so early.
And I didn't realize Williams did that well especially considering he missed time with an injury.
 

Zekeats

theranchsucks
Messages
13,169
Reaction score
15,724
I'm probably old school but I'm not a big fan of underwear Olympics gold medalists with average production moving up that far.

It was just their rookie seasons but the stats are an interesting comparison:

Travon Walker round 1 pick 1
College 33 tackles 7.5 TFL 6 sacks
NFL 49 tackles 5 TFL 3.5 sacks 10 QB hits

Aidan Hutchinson round 1 pick 2
College 62 tackles 16.5 TFL 14 sacks
NFL 52 tackles 9 TFL 9.5 sacks 15 QB hits

Sam Williams Round 2 pick 56
College 57 tackles 15 TFL 12.5 sacks
NFL 22 tackles 10 TFL 4 sacks 9 QB hits
And who played extremely limited time? You forgot to mention that part.
 

Majic

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,844
Reaction score
2,290
We should be a 3-4 team with Parsons and Sam Williams already. Then if a guy like Kancey was there you could take him and put him at DE on a 3-4.
I'm going to keep banging the drum for this also. When you have a player of Parsons ability you build the scheme around him. I believe 3-4 OLB is best for him. I think a lot of defensive coaches would think the same and make the switch.
 

tm1119

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,964
Reaction score
8,707
I'm going to keep banging the drum for this also. When you have a player of Parsons ability you build the scheme around him. I believe 3-4 OLB is best for him. I think a lot of defensive coaches would think the same and make the switch.
Running a consistent base 3-3-5 would make this D nasty.

Lawrence-Hankins-Owa
Parsons-LVE-Williams (Parson’s versatility in coverage would shine, but still blitz him a ton)
Diggs-Gillmore-Kearse-Wilson-Hooker

Remove Williams for Bland in the nickel
 

Majic

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,844
Reaction score
2,290
Running a consistent base 3-3-5 would make this D nasty.

Lawrence-Hankins-Owa
Parsons-LVE-Williams (Parson’s versatility in coverage would shine, but still blitz him a ton)
Diggs-Gillmore-Kearse-Wilson-Hooker

Remove Williams for Bland in the nickel
Interesting, with Kearse more as an ILB?
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,937
Reaction score
9,845
I'm probably old school but I'm not a big fan of underwear Olympics gold medalists with average production moving up that far.

It was just their rookie seasons but the stats are an interesting comparison:

Travon Walker round 1 pick 1
College 33 tackles 7.5 TFL 6 sacks
NFL 49 tackles 5 TFL 3.5 sacks 10 QB hits

Aidan Hutchinson round 1 pick 2
College 62 tackles 16.5 TFL 14 sacks
NFL 52 tackles 9 TFL 9.5 sacks 15 QB hits

Sam Williams Round 2 pick 56
College 57 tackles 15 TFL 12.5 sacks
NFL 22 tackles 10 TFL 4 sacks 9 QB hits
You have to dig a little deeper because you’re completely ignoring the number of pass rush snaps he’s played and the type of defense UGA runs.

His pass rush win rate is elite. Like, better then the 2 dudes that were taken top 10 last year.
 

morasp

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,440
Reaction score
6,851
You have to dig a little deeper because you’re completely ignoring the number of pass rush snaps he’s played and the type of defense UGA runs.

His pass rush win rate is elite. Like, better then the 2 dudes that were taken top 10 last year.
I guess you need to spell it out for me. I guess you mean Walker since he played at Georgia. It really wouldn't matter because I'll take Williams all day over him anyway. Of course as I mentioned he will probably get better with a year under his belt but I'm hoping Williams does too.
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,937
Reaction score
9,845
I guess you need to spell it out for me. I guess you mean Walker since he played at Georgia. It really wouldn't matter because I'll take Williams all day over him anyway.
No I’m talking about Smith.

His last healthy season he had 7 sacks and Anderson was around 14. Anderson played like 300 more snaps than him bc GA rotates the heck out of their players.
 

morasp

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,440
Reaction score
6,851
No I’m talking about Smith.

His last healthy season he had 7 sacks and Anderson was around 14. Anderson played like 300 more snaps than him bc GA rotates the heck out of their players.
I looked it up and he played 8 games, didn't know he was injured. Can't really speak to how many snaps he logged but on a per game basis 3 sacks is still pretty low. How many sacks did Anderson have?
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,937
Reaction score
9,845
I looked it up and he played 8 games, didn't know he was injured. Can't really speak to how many snaps he logged but on a per game basis 3 sacks is still pretty low. How many sacks did Anderson have?
No idea. But again, I’d recommend looking into more advanced stats and the actual amount of snaps played.

On a per snap / basis, Smith is among the most efficient edge rushers in the class.
 

morasp

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,440
Reaction score
6,851
No idea. But again, I’d recommend looking into more advanced stats and the actual amount of snaps played.

On a per snap / basis, Smith is among the most efficient edge rushers in the class.
It might be worth looking at I'll take your word for it, but it also makes me wonder how well he would do with an increased workload, 12.5 sacks in four seasons isn't that good.
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,937
Reaction score
9,845
It might be worth looking at I'll take your word for it, but it also makes me wonder how well he would do with an increased workload, 12.5 sacks in four seasons isn't that good.
He’ll be fine. There’s a lot more to the eval than just looking at sacks. The best player in the draft (his teammate Carter) has less career sacks.
 

morasp

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,440
Reaction score
6,851
He’ll be fine. There’s a lot more to the eval than just looking at sacks. The best player in the draft (his teammate Carter) has less career sacks.
I wouldn't take him at in the top 10 or even at 26. but that's just my opinion and maybe he'll prove me wrong. I wouldn't be surprised if he doesn't. They aren't perfect but NFL.com ranks him at 58.
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,937
Reaction score
9,845
I wouldn't take him at in the top 10 or even at 26. but that's just my opinion and maybe he'll prove me wrong. I wouldn't be surprised if he doesn't. They aren't perfect but NFL.com ranks him at 58.
You’re going to be surprised at how early he’s taken.

And I’d look at more than just 1 site for rankings. 58 is laughable for Smith.
 

baltcowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,642
Reaction score
18,299
I'm not sure Edge Rusher is the best pick at #26 with Micah, Ware, Williams, Armstrong and Fowler how much play time will Smith Nolan get?

Not a knock on the player, but for a first rounder we need someone who can contribute right away.

Yeah, he'll probably be able to replace Ware eventually but Sam Williams very well could be the DE2 next season if he progresses.

Think the team needs to address another position in Round 1.

And yes, we can never have too many good pass rushers, but a lot of other positions need attention too first imo.
The Cowboys pass rushers are average at best once you take away Parsons. Quinn has a great scheme but when teams started gutting us with the run, the pass rush stopped. Reports are the Cowboys believe when Tank hurt his foot it put more on Parsons and it affected his play. A pass rusher is one of the Cowboys top needs. Besides Parsons we have a bunch of jags. Look at their salaries.
 

J12B

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,788
Reaction score
23,423
The Cowboys pass rushers are average at best once you take away Parsons. Quinn has a great scheme but when teams started gutting us with the run, the pass rush stopped. Reports are the Cowboys believe when Tank hurt his foot it put more on Parsons and it affected his play. A pass rusher is one of the Cowboys top needs. Besides Parsons we have a bunch of jags. Look at their salaries.

We did spend a 2nd rounder on Sam Williams last year and a 1st rounder on Parsons the year prior.

Need to improve elsewhere. Maybe Calijah Cancey since he's interior Dline, but I don't know if he'll help against the run since he's seen as more of a pass rush DT.
 

AsthmaField

Outta bounds
Messages
26,489
Reaction score
44,544
Hey, there were a lot of years we would have been way better off had we done that rather than try to outsmart everyone by drafting guys from Sister Mary's School of the Inferior!!
For better than a decade now, Dallas has pretty much been hitting on their first round picks… with Taco being a notable exception.

But hey, if you follow that first round philosophy, just imagine the money you could save on scouts! You wouldn’t even need them. Just pick the highest rated SEC player and hope that Saban or Smart knew what they were doing.
 

morasp

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,440
Reaction score
6,851
You’re going to be surprised at how early he’s taken.

And I’d look at more than just 1 site for rankings. 58 is laughable for Smith.
I'll stick with NFL.com they usually do a pretty good job. If he does get taken at ten than good for him. You might be taking this a little too serious, your welcome to your opinion just like me and everyone else on this forum but don't take it personally if mine is different than yours. These are guys that are going to make more money than I ever did in my whole career and they could care less what we think. Like I said I may be wrong, we'll find out in a few years, but if he can't get on the field on college for whatever reason it actually gets harder in the NFL.
 
Last edited:
Top