McKDaddy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,627
- Reaction score
- 10,320
Yeah, you can't say Dak didn't have time on most plays. Run blocking is a fair criticism.The pass blocking wasn’t too bad
Yeah, you can't say Dak didn't have time on most plays. Run blocking is a fair criticism.The pass blocking wasn’t too bad
I believe I have responded to several people in this thread and said over and over that I am disappointed in Dak's play. But there were eleven men on the field who were losing their assignments to the Washington players. Why is it people who live and breathe Dak spite refuse to acknowledge that some of us wo are not quick to say Dak is the sole reason the team loses must mean we ignore his faults?So blame anyone and anything but the QB?
You are new here and have not had the opportunity to understand I don't give a tinker's damn what these guys make. Jethro and Little Anus have not shown in 27 years they will utilize the money to build a team that is strong on both sides of the ball. So if Dak makes 40 mill a years, which is less than others who have signed since, that will never make a difference because of who runs this team.Are any of them making 40 million a year? Are any of them accounting for 20% of your total Cap hit? Theres a reason #85 is playing a lot of snaps.. It aint cause the coaches think hes one of the best wideouts in the league.. Its cause hes cheap.
I wondered what you dak idiots would choose for the excuse today for Dak playing badly
Clearly the O line is the consensus choice
First off, I and no one who doesn't assail Dak with slander after a loss are idiots. I suggest you review the rules of this board and name calling.actually the dak fanatics were indeed claiming he was not bad today
this whole thread started out by a dak fanatic looking for an excuse
Learn to spell if you intend to quote Shakespeare. It's thou.Though dost protest too much Tad.
Lawyering since you got called on itI believe I have responded to several people in this thread and said over and over that I am disappointed in Dak's play. But there were eleven men on the field who were losing their assignments to the Washington players. Why is it people who live and breathe Dak spite refuse to acknowledge that some of us wo are not quick to say Dak is the sole reason the team loses must mean we ignore his faults?
You are new here and have not had the opportunity to understand I don't give a tinker's damn what these guys make. Jethro and Little Anus have not shown in 27 years they will utilize the money to build a team that is strong on both sides of the ball. So if Dak makes 40 mill a years, which is less than others who have signed since, that will never make a difference because of who runs this team.
Dallas has needed defensive tackles and safeties since The Poodle was the head coach and have yet to address that. So why should I waste my time wringing hands over the salary of Dak? Your argument doesn't fly with me.
First off, I and no one who doesn't assail Dak with slander after a loss are idiots. I suggest you review the rules of this board and name calling.
Second, I started this thread, and I am not making excuses for Dak. I am stating there are reasons why things happen, and if you look at the fact Dallas is one of the top scoring teams in the league, yet over the last few weeks they have been hurt by offensive line injuries which has trickled down into both the rushing and passing games, that suggests Dak is not the lobe suspect in the failure on the field.
I don't have to excuse Dak, because this is a team game Now if that gets your boxers in a bunch, that's okay. But don't jump in here and assign comments to people when they did not make them.
I believe I have responded to several people in this thread and said over and over that I am disappointed in Dak's play. But there were eleven men on the field who were losing their assignments to the Washington players. Why is it people who live and breathe Dak spite refuse to acknowledge that some of us wo are not quick to say Dak is the sole reason the team loses must mean we ignore his faults?
You are new here and have not had the opportunity to understand I don't give a tinker's damn what these guys make. Jethro and Little Anus have not shown in 27 years they will utilize the money to build a team that is strong on both sides of the ball. So if Dak makes 40 mill a years, which is less than others who have signed since, that will never make a difference because of who runs this team.
Dallas has needed defensive tackles and safeties since The Poodle was the head coach and have yet to address that. So why should I waste my time wringing hands over the salary of Dak? Your argument doesn't fly with me.
First off, I and no one who doesn't assail Dak with slander after a loss are idiots. I suggest you review the rules of this board and name calling.
Second, I started this thread, and I am not making excuses for Dak. I am stating there are reasons why things happen, and if you look at the fact Dallas is one of the top scoring teams in the league, yet over the last few weeks they have been hurt by offensive line injuries which has trickled down into both the rushing and passing games, that suggests Dak is not the lobe suspect in the failure on the field.
I don't have to excuse Dak, because this is a team game Now if that gets your boxers in a bunch, that's okay. But don't jump in here and assign comments to people when they did not make them.
I truly pity the experience you seem to be having with this team. But I have been posting here with you for quite a while and wonder have you forgotten Quincy, Wright, Drew Henson and others? Dak isn't Brady, but he is leaps and bounds better than those guys.“Disappointed” is the understatement of the century
Dak was a so horrific he was the paramount reason for our loss
After line failures that were going on following opponent successes...linemen were just standing around the failed blocking as if nothing happened or they weren't guilty parties. Kind of like movie star Cowboys.While the fans of this site kick the QB over and over, it seems all these people are either neophytes to pro football, or they are so biased they ignore what is playing out before them.
If the team can't run for over 3 yards a carry, and that is with both Zeke and Pollard, and the defensive front is in the backfield harassing the passing game at every turn, then to blame Dak solely is ridiculous.
I am disappointed in this game today. But I also see every pass being contested by the DB's of the Washington team as the front seven is in Dak's face continually.
Believe that or not. But the stats suggest when this team protects the QB and makes lanes to run, these guys are at the top of the league. So what changed over the last few weeks?
This is not the same offensive front that was protecting and creating running space.
While you're certainly entitled to think what you like and voice that here. There is far more to this than the QB. And if you deny that, then your bias and disappointment is clouding what is transpiring on the field.
I agree with some of that but Dak gets some blame too. That pick 6 today was as terrible as it gets.While the fans of this site kick the QB over and over, it seems all these people are either neophytes to pro football, or they are so biased they ignore what is playing out before them.
If the team can't run for over 3 yards a carry, and that is with both Zeke and Pollard, and the defensive front is in the backfield harassing the passing game at every turn, then to blame Dak solely is ridiculous.
I am disappointed in this game today. But I also see every pass being contested by the DB's of the Washington team as the front seven is in Dak's face continually.
Believe that or not. But the stats suggest when this team protects the QB and makes lanes to run, these guys are at the top of the league. So what changed over the last few weeks?
This is not the same offensive front that was protecting and creating running space.
While you're certainly entitled to think what you like and voice that here. There is far more to this than the QB. And if you deny that, then your bias and disappointment is clouding what is transpiring on the field.
Why are you such a P R I C K?Learn to spell if you intend to quote Shakespeare. It's thou.
Biadsz back means the line is intact minus Steele. I’m more concerned with KM and his play calling than the line play this week. Running Zeke into a stacked D every first down isn’t putting our fragile minded QB in a good position.Then: Tyler-Connor-Biadasz-Martin-Steele
Now: Peters-Tyler-Connor-Martin-Tyron
That's a lot of moving parts and it's really showing up in the running game. Not sure how that gets fixed in a week.
Ah yes, so now we blaming the OL for all of Dak’s pick 6s. We’ve reached into the bag of excuses, where we don’t even count the ones that are caused by his armgetting hit, even though it’s because he has garbage pocket presence and is slow reading the field..
Yep and on the pick six, I think Shultz was open in the middle but Dak just decided he was throwing it to Noah pre snap! Dak in an average NFL QB with some good days/quarters thrown in but wildly inconsistent and poor in the pocket. CD was so frustrated yesterday. I am pretty sure guys were open and Dak was not throwing it to the right people!Ah yes, so now we blaming the OL for all of Dak’s pick 6s. We’ve reached into the bag of excuses, where we don’t even count the ones that are caused by his armgetting hit, even though it’s because he has garbage pocket presence and is slow reading the field..
Sounds like you are scapegoating the OL for Dak’s horrible play.