Offensive output

[tomsanders921]

After 3 games we are the lowest scoring team in the NFL, as long as the packers and seahawks both put up at least 4 points.

And we have also turned the ball over quite a bit.

It's amazing we are 2-1 with how putrid our offense has been so far. Our defense has been amazing, especially with the short fields they have been forced to defend over and over.

And i believe all of our points yesterday were off turnovers and the dez punt return.

 

[Ren]

OL kinda matters despite what some people around here where claiming in the offseason.

You can have the best everything and still struggle if you can't block, on one play yesterday they got to Romo with a 3 man rush in less then 2 seconds we had 6 people trying to block that

 

[rwalters31]

I looked at the total offense this morning and Dallas is I think 26th in total yards. The defense is 1st in total yards. Although it is defense that spells long term win success, you have to have some offense. At less the offense should not be commenting penalties and turn overs. Yes, defense can and does win games and can take you deep into the playoffs. But, offense has to at less have field position and keep the defense off the field for a while. Oh, by the way not getting your QB killed also helps. Hey, this is me trying to be positive.:

 

[Cowboy_Shawn]

OL kinda matters despite what some people around here where claiming in the offseason.

You can have the best everything and still struggle if you can't block, on one play yesterday they got to Romo with a 3 man rush in less then 2 seconds we had 6 people trying to block that

That play had me pissed. And to no surprise, it came on Free's side of the line.

 

[The Emperor]

OL kinda matters despite what some people around here where claiming in the offseason.

You can have the best everything and still struggle if you can't block, on one play yesterday they got to Romo with a 3 man rush in less then 2 seconds we had 6 people trying to block that

No one claimed that, ever.

What they claimed was that we had improved our offensive line.

 

[big dog cowboy]

It's all about the process.

 

[Ren]

No one claimed that, ever.

Several people did, i'm not going to call out people by names cause that's pretty lame but all you really have to do is go read up in the draft zone from around draft day and you will see plenty of it. Several posters and their condescending attitudes have been proven wrong so far, these people know who they are

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Several people did, i'm not going to call out people by names cause that's pretty lame but all you really have to do is go read up in the draft zone from around draft day and you will see plenty of it. Several posters and their condescending attitudes have been proven wrong so far, these people know who they are

Go ahead and call them because i am saying you are completely full of ****.

 

[Ren]

Go ahead and call them because i am saying you are completely full of ****.

Just because you are a lame *** doesn't mean i will be just cause you want me to

If you want some names PM me and i'll reply with some names but i think call out threads and forum call out are for ***s

 

[The Emperor]

Several people did, i'm not going to call out people by names cause that's pretty lame but all you really have to do is go read up in the draft zone from around draft day and you will see plenty of it. Several posters and their condescending attitudes have been proven wrong so far, these people know who they are

I don't remember reading any of that, and I'd be surprised to see it since that's one of the default arguments of my fellow Romosexuals: the offensive line sucks. So how could you blast the offensive line yet also say it's not important? I'll go back and take a look. Maybe. I don't really care that much to agree or disagree further.

But what I seem to remember reading is people saying Livings and Bernadeau would improve Costa's play and that the Free/Smith tackle swap would solve our problems there.

Regardless, we're in a world of hurt right now.