Offensive Skilll Level question for fun

vlad

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,205
Reaction score
3,221
Hi Board,
Here's a question for fun (and for me educational since I know a lot of you pay a great deal more attention than I do):

How would you compare our talent/skill level on offense (definitely including the o-line) to say GB? NO or anyone else if you want.

i.e. scale of 10
QB - GB=10, DC=9
RB - GB=5, DC=7.5
WR - GB=8, DC=8
TE - GB=7, DC=8
OL - GB=7, DC=3

Off Coord - GB-10, DC=5

Just curious what people think relative to other teams...and why you think we lag in whatever areas you think we do.

have fun....
PS
I live in NYC - so I'm representing as best I can to all these fools!
 
QB
GB- 9.5. Aaron Rodgers is legit and he's playing out of his mind right now.
DAL- 7.5. Romo has the potential to be a 9-10, but he must reach it. Playing well right now.

RB
GB- 4. Inconsistency in the rushing game.
DAL- With Fiametta, 8.5. Without, 6.

WR
GB- 8. Excellent WR corps.
DAL- 6. Thin at best and again has the potential to be a 9-10, but must reach it. Playing average right now.

TE
GB- 7. Utilize their TE position better than most teams right now.
DAL- 9. True strength of our offense, from Witten down to Phillips.

OL

GB- 9. Young line is playing very well together right now.
DAL- Another 6. And, again, could be 9-10. They are realizing their potential, just need one more key piece and some time to gel.


That's just how I see it. Fun idea for a thread.
 
umm i would say our offensive line is equal to greenbays. The might have a better center though:bang2:

Aaron rodgers has been sacked more then tony romo on less pass attempts.

roders 408 attempts and has been sacked 29 times
romo 422 attempts and has been sacked 21 times.

in the run game our offensive line> then their offensive line.

The difference is play calling put tony romo in GB system and what him get busy.
 
sureletsrace;4297418 said:
OL
DAL- Another 6. And, again, could be 9-10. They are realizing their potential, just need one more key piece and some time to gel.

I've seen it all now.
 
Risen Star;4297482 said:
I've seen it all now.

What, do you feel I have them ranked too low? I didn't even rank Aaron Rodgers a 10. 10 is like, world-beater domination. 5 is average. They are playing just above average but could be insanely good next year or the year after. I'd say 9 would be a pro-bowl line. 8 is very, very good. 7 is very good. 6 is good, above average.

Like I said, that's just how I see it.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,671
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top