Offseason defensive improvement strategies during the draft

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,307
Reaction score
63,996
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
The defense improved late in the season and has proven to be very good, but it still has holes. Once those holes are patched, it will become an even better defensive unit. The key to that improvement is a solid triangle consisting of the nose tackle and inside linebackers secures whether a 3-4 defense can be most effective:

http://i356.***BLOCKED***/albums/oo4/DallasEast1701/triangleinteriorexample.jpg

Currently, our defensive interior consists of:

http://i356.***BLOCKED***/albums/oo4/DallasEast1701/triangleCURRENTinteriorexample.jpg

Note: Bobby Carpenter was Zach Thomas’s backup. It does not mean that he will have the job in 2009, but with Thomas leaving it presents the opportunity for him to move into his slot.

When an offense attacks the interior of the 3-4 with its running game, it does so by first blocking the nose tackle. Regardless of gap assignment or the technique he is using in run defense, the nose tackle is both shielding the inside linebackers and disrupting the blocking assignments of the center and guards, thus allowing the inside linebackers to flow to the ball carrier both inside and from sideline-to-sideline more quickly.

Ratliff did a very good job anchoring the middle of the defensive line, but a more solid tackle can be an upgrade and allow Ratliff to be more flexible as a defensive end (even though he has previously expressed disinterest playing the position). Bradie James has the veteran experience to continue locking down one of the inside linebacker positions, but Bobby Carpenter does not. However, as a former first-round pick, he should be given the opportunity to prove that he can fill the bill, but this position especially needs first-string and/or depth insurance.

Offense also attack triangles in the defense with their passing attack outside of the interior triangle. Some examples of how an offense attacks these other triangles can be seen below:

http://i356.***BLOCKED***/albums/oo4/DallasEast1701/triangleexamples.jpg

In a 3-4 defense, the inside linebackers have to be big, physical and fast to take on guards blocking and cover against the pass in the middle of the field. This is another argument for strengthening the position via the draft. Kevin Burnett has the speed, power and skill to defend against both the run and pass on the outside, but can he become big enough to weaken the argument of looking elsewhere to strengthen the interior triangle? In my opinion, he can’t and he will continue to provide depth at outside linebacker.

In the 3-4, the outside linebackers are the primary pass rushers, not the defensive ends. Ware has one of those positions locked down for the duration of his career, but the position opposite him has to get better. The only question left for Anthony Spencer to answer to move in front of Greg Ellis is whether he can defend against the pass well enough. In my opinion, he can be as good or better than Ellis in this area and will decrease the emphasis of drafting someone as starter competition or even fortifying the position which could continue with a rotation of Ware/Burnett and Spencer/Ellis. Another plus in Spencer’s favor is his untapped NFL-level potential (yes bad word) to rush the quarterback or put his hand on the ground defending against the run in any 4-3/4-6 packages which Wade Phillips began to experiment with more often this season.

Cornerback was strongly addressed in the last draft, so it will receive less emphasis. Safety is another question altogether. Ken Hamlin has been very serviceable as a free safety. If Roy Williams can convince the front office that he will be fully recovered for the upcoming season, I doubt that they will place great emphasis at drafting strong safety.

So, in my very early opinion, during the draft, Jerry Jones may target (if best player available coincides):

§ Minimum of one (1) nose tackle in the early rounds
§ Minimum of two (2) inside linebackers in the mid rounds
§ Minimun of one (1) safety in mid to late rounds who has played mostly strong safety in college

I can’t wait for April to get here. :eek::
 

Chocolate Lab

Run-loving Dino
Messages
37,107
Reaction score
11,449
:clap2: Nice, DE.

I totally agree that we need ILBs and and a SS. Maybe even a OLB later to develop so as Ellis falls off we have someone ready to go and we can keep that 3-OLB rush package going. I'm still a Spencer fan as far as starters go.

The NT would be nice, but they seem hard to find... I trust Wade's judgment as he coached the original NFL 34 NT (Curly Culp), found Pat Williams as an undrafted FA, and turned Jamal Williams from a nice talent into one of the best 34 NTs in the game. If no one's out there in either the draft or FA and Rat plays there another year, that's okay too.

But I'm more pumped for this draft than for any in a long time, because I know we're going to draft the hard-hitting, aggressive positions that should be the core of your team.
 

DaBoys4Life

Benched
Messages
15,626
Reaction score
0
Nice post. I disagree with you about needed a SS > FS. I think we need a FS more some who can play the pass really well tackle well.
 

Biggems

White and Nerdy
Messages
14,327
Reaction score
2,254
SLATEmosphere;2602026 said:
I'm like a broken record...Sean Smith...Sean Smith...Sean Smith..Sean Smith...


I have moved from Rashad Johnson to Sean Smith as being my preferred 1st pick for Dallas........unfortunately, it seems that neither will be available when we draft at 51...
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,307
Reaction score
63,996
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Chocolate Lab;2602003 said:
:clap2: Nice, DE.

I totally agree that we need ILBs and and a SS. Maybe even a OLB later to develop so as Ellis falls off we have someone ready to go and we can keep that 3-OLB rush package going. I'm still a Spencer fan as far as starters go.

The NT would be nice, but they seem hard to find... I trust Wade's judgment as he coached the original NFL 34 NT (Curly Culp), found Pat Williams as an undrafted FA, and turned Jamal Williams from a nice talent into one of the best 34 NTs in the game. If no one's out there in either the draft or FA and Rat plays there another year, that's okay too.

But I'm more pumped for this draft than for any in a long time, because I know we're going to draft the hard-hitting, aggressive positions that should be the core of your team.
The hardest thing for me creating posts like these are going against what I feel the team needs most and trying to figure out what the heck Jerry Jones will do. I wouldn't mind us targeting a left tackle because Flozell Adams is on the downside of his career in my opinion, but shoring on the defensive line is just as important.

There are a couple of very good defensive tackles who would be good fits for Dallas and both played for Boston College: Ron Brace and B.J. Raji. Raji had some good reports out of Senior Bowl week and possibly upped his draft stock to first- or early second-round. Brace wasn't as visible, but he's more of a solid run-stopper anyway and he's a load in the middle. He could be available in the third or fourth rounds.

DaBoys4Life;2602049 said:
Nice post. I disagree with you about needed a SS > FS. I think we need a FS more some who can play the pass really well tackle well.
Every defensive player should have solid tackling skills and our defense suffered from lack of said skills this season. If you're referring to that crappy tackling of Hamlin against the Ravens, I see your point, but we're still talking about free safety and strong safety. Strong safety primarily plays the run first, the pass second and (should) require solid tackling skills because he's usually the last line of the defense during a rushing down. A free safety primarily plays the pass first and the run second.

While I agree that you want a free safety to tackle well and finding one that can do that and defend the pass equally well is a plus, you want the free safety to be a ball-hawker first and foremost. If he's making a lot of tackles, either the defense has become all-world playing the pass or there isn't anyone else better than him playing deep because his pass defense skills must really suck.
 

Zaxor

Virtus Mille Scuta
Messages
8,406
Reaction score
38
not to dis the post but Barbie was James' backup...Burnett was Thomas' backup...
 

DaBoys4Life

Benched
Messages
15,626
Reaction score
0
DallasEast;2602098 said:
Every defensive player should have solid tackling skills and our defense suffered from lack of said skills this season. If you're referring to that crappy tackling of Hamlin against the Ravens, I see your point, but we're still talking about free safety and strong safety. Strong safety primarily plays the run first, the pass second and (should) require solid tackling skills because he's usually the last line of the defense during a rushing down. A free safety primarily plays the pass first and the run second.

While I agree that you want a free safety to tackle well and finding one that can do that and defend the pass equally well is a plus, you want the free safety to be a ball-hawker first and foremost. If he's making a lot of tackles, either the defense has become all-world playing the pass or there isn't anyone else better than him playing deep because his pass defense skills must really suck.

A ball hawk would be nice. I don't think Hamlin is a ball hawk actually I don't think too highly of Hamlin. It doesn't even have to do with the Ravens game it's just icing he had a very poor season and to be honest we shouldn't of even paid him that money in the off season. He's overrated and isn't any better than RW and just get's a pass on a lot of his mistakes because he isn't RW. A good FS would go a long way to helping this team same with improving the D Line. We could have a bunch of bums in the secondary if we can have a consistent pass rush.
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,307
Reaction score
63,996
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
DaBoys4Life;2602143 said:
A ball hawk would be nice. I don't think Hamlin is a ball hawk actually I don't think too highly of Hamlin. It doesn't even have to do with the Ravens game it's just icing he had a very poor season and to be honest we shouldn't of even paid him that money in the off season. He's overrated and isn't any better than RW and just get's a pass on a lot of his mistakes because he isn't RW. A good FS would go a long way to helping this team same with improving the D Line. We could have a bunch of bums in the secondary if we can have a consistent pass rush.
I agree with your assessment of Hamlin. He's not as good a free safety as I had hoped, but he's good enough to offset a draft pick to replace him. Plus there is still Pat Watkins to consider.
 

Clove

Shrinkage
Messages
64,894
Reaction score
27,491
DaBoys4Life;2602143 said:
A ball hawk would be nice. I don't think Hamlin is a ball hawk actually I don't think too highly of Hamlin. It doesn't even have to do with the Ravens game it's just icing he had a very poor season and to be honest we shouldn't of even paid him that money in the off season. He's overrated and isn't any better than RW and just get's a pass on a lot of his mistakes because he isn't RW. A good FS would go a long way to helping this team same with improving the D Line. We could have a bunch of bums in the secondary if we can have a consistent pass rush.
In fairness to Hamlin, he had a pretty darn good year his contract year, and releasing him to FA would've been a gamble.

I do think it's better to go get either a proven guy, someone who's done it year after year, or draft a good one.
 

Zaxor

Virtus Mille Scuta
Messages
8,406
Reaction score
38
DallasEast;2602134 said:
You're not dissing if it's the truth. You're right. When I wrote the post, I thought it was Burnett, but wasn't sure. So, instead of double-checking the depth chart at dallascowboys.com , I checked the depth chart at nfl.com instead. Me--> :banghead:

Now are you ready for some speculative truths....

If as a linebacker you are refered to as a finesse Linebacker...(which is how Jerry refered to Barbie) you stand no chance to play in any scheme in the NFL...

Burnett while he makes plays seems awful fragile....and with a concussion or 2 on his resume already I would be very leary of making long term plans for him...

Thomas is not an every down player anymore... or so it seems as he was pulled on passing downs

If we do not grab atleast 3 ILB we will be in trouble...

James is the only contributer that is signed...

We need his backup... Barbie ain't it
We need a couple of them on the other side and as big a fan of Thomas as I am I was disappointed in his play...
 

Zaxor

Virtus Mille Scuta
Messages
8,406
Reaction score
38
DaBoys4Life;2602143 said:
A ball hawk would be nice. I don't think Hamlin is a ball hawk actually I don't think too highly of Hamlin. It doesn't even have to do with the Ravens game it's just icing he had a very poor season and to be honest we shouldn't of even paid him that money in the off season. He's overrated and isn't any better than RW and just get's a pass on a lot of his mistakes because he isn't RW. A good FS would go a long way to helping this team same with improving the D Line. We could have a bunch of bums in the secondary if we can have a consistent pass rush.

this is not a pat on the back or an I told you so post...but I was against the Hamlin and the Flozell resigning... I think letting Hamlin keep the franchise designation would have been a smarter move...Flo well I guess they had to keep him as it seems we have no one else capable of playing that position.

But it would have been very beneficial for us had Free been able to come through...God we need OL bad....We don't seem to have a decent backup at any position unless it is Holland.. but who can tell.. as it took the dude forever to just get playing time and as soon as he did he was hurt.
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,307
Reaction score
63,996
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Zaxor;2602171 said:
Now are you ready for some speculative truths....

If as a linebacker you are refered to as a finesse Linebacker...(which is how Jerry refered to Barbie) you stand no chance to play in any scheme in the NFL...

Burnett while he makes plays seems awful fragile....and with a concussion or 2 on his resume already I would be very leary of making long term plans for him...

Thomas is not an every down player anymore... or so it seems as he was pulled on passing downs

If we do not grab atleast 3 ILB we will be in trouble...

James is the only contributer that is signed...

We need his backup... Barbie ain't it
We need a couple of them on the other side and as big a fan of Thomas as I am I was disappointed in his play...
Well, Thomas has exited stage left, so you can count him out.

Burnett's injury history is a hindrance for him becoming a starter, but not as a backup. 1/2 of the position next to James/Carpenter is already filled unless Jones is going to give up on his former first-rounder. I'm not saying that it's not a possibility, but I will believe it when I see it.

Three slots filled. Maybe Jones will again go for a veteran like Thomas, but I doubt that it'll keep him from drafting at least two inside linebackers regardless of what he does in free agency.
 

Rockytop6

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
84
Chocolate Lab;2602003 said:
:clap2: Nice, DE.

I totally agree that we need ILBs and and a SS. Maybe even a OLB later to develop so as Ellis falls off we have someone ready to go and we can keep that 3-OLB rush package going. I'm still a Spencer fan as far as starters go.

The NT would be nice, but they seem hard to find... I trust Wade's judgment as he coached the original NFL 34 NT (Curly Culp), found Pat Williams as an undrafted FA, and turned Jamal Williams from a nice talent into one of the best 34 NTs in the game. If no one's out there in either the draft or FA and Rat plays there another year, that's okay too.

But I'm more pumped for this draft than for any in a long time, because I know we're going to draft the hard-hitting, aggressive positions that should be the core of your team.

Don't forget a couple of OL!
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,874
Reaction score
15,969
Just as a quick note, DE, Kevin Burnett backed up Zach Thomas, not Bobby Carpenter and Zach even acknowledged Burnett would be a good fit for the position when he stated he didn't really wanna come back because it wasn't his ideal position.

Carpenter backed up the water boy and Bradie James.
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,874
Reaction score
15,969
DallasEast;2602134 said:
You're not dissing if it's the truth. You're right. When I wrote the post, I thought it was Burnett, but wasn't sure. So, instead of double-checking the depth chart at dallascowboys.com , I checked the depth chart at nfl.com instead. Me--> :banghead:

bah shoulda read entire thread first:)

as to the content of the post I think Wade prefers more quickness a la Ratliff than a big run stuffer but it sure would be nice to have one on the roster for at least short yardage. i think tank sulked about that role and ultimately just stunk.

FWIW to others in the thread, Sean Smith has a late first round grade apparently. That's why he came out.
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,307
Reaction score
63,996
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
jterrell;2602284 said:
bah shoulda read entire thread first:)

as to the content of the post I think Wade prefers more quickness a la Ratliff than a big run stuffer but it sure would be nice to have one on the roster for at least short yardage. i think tank sulked about that role and ultimately just stunk.

FWIW to others in the thread, Sean Smith has a late first round grade apparently. That's why he came out.
I agree with you about Phillips preferring Ratliff, but I wonder if he will continue to want him manning the middle of the defensive line. As a pass rushing nose tackle, Ratliff may belong in the upper 1/3 of the league, but he's a slight liability against the run as a 2-gap NT. He does his job well and even prefers the position, but he's not a true run stopping force in the middle.
 
Top