CowboysLaw87
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 662
- Reaction score
- 306
I watched a lot of Shazier yesterday. Dude can seriously fly... really fun to watch. His strengths are (obviously) chasing plays sideline-to-sideline, and exploding downhill through holes once he sees what's developing in front of him.
I don't see a player with the instincts of Mosley, but his instincts are far better than what I see from Barr. For what it's worth, I do really like what I see from Shazier in coverage. He is fluid, long, and hustles hard. I also love his temperament on the field. Despite his lack of bulk, he loves sticking his nose in the pile and playing physical.
The problem is that his lack of bulk and strength at the POA causes him try to juke OL at times instead of stack/shed. This sometimes results in impressive gap shooting tackles, but sometimes results in guessing wrong and opening a big hole. Overall, I really like him. There are a couple things to clean up, but he plays like a near dream Tampa-2 WILL. Because 4-3 OLB is generally not a position of tremendous value, I wouldn't be on board with selecting him at #16, but as others have said, in a modest trade down I think he's right in there with the Ford's and Crichton's.
I don't see a player with the instincts of Mosley, but his instincts are far better than what I see from Barr. For what it's worth, I do really like what I see from Shazier in coverage. He is fluid, long, and hustles hard. I also love his temperament on the field. Despite his lack of bulk, he loves sticking his nose in the pile and playing physical.
The problem is that his lack of bulk and strength at the POA causes him try to juke OL at times instead of stack/shed. This sometimes results in impressive gap shooting tackles, but sometimes results in guessing wrong and opening a big hole. Overall, I really like him. There are a couple things to clean up, but he plays like a near dream Tampa-2 WILL. Because 4-3 OLB is generally not a position of tremendous value, I wouldn't be on board with selecting him at #16, but as others have said, in a modest trade down I think he's right in there with the Ford's and Crichton's.