OJ soon to be a "Jail Bird"

STAR GAZER

Benched
Messages
2,047
Reaction score
0
By KEN RITTER, Associated Press Writer



LAS VEGAS - A court official says the jury has reached a decision in the O.J. Simpson armed robbery and kidnapping trial in Las Vegas.

Court spokesman Michael Sommermeyer says the verdict will be read around 10 p.m. in Clark County District Court.

The 61-year-old former football star and a golfing buddy, 54-year-old Clarence "C.J." Stewart, were tried on 12 criminal charges in the alleged gunpoint robbery of two sports memorabilia dealers in a casino hotel room last year.

Each faces five years to life in prison if convicted of kidnapping, or mandatory prison time if convicted of armed robbery.

The jury of nine women and three men deliberated more than 13 hours Friday.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.

LAS VEGAS (AP) — Jurors in the O.J. Simpson trial worked into the night Friday deliberating the fate of the former football star and a co-defendant, accused of robbing two sports memorabilia dealers at gunpoint in a casino hotel room.

With no verdict reached after 11 hours, lawyers for both defendants arrived at the courthouse about 7:30 p.m. but didn't meet with the judge.

"They didn't tell us there's a verdict," said Simpson lawyer Yale Galanter, adding that the defense teams spent the day a nearby law office. "It's late. We just came over to try to figure out scheduling."

The 61-year-old former football star and a golfing buddy, Clarence "C.J." Stewart each face five years to life in prison if convicted of kidnapping, or mandatory prison time if convicted of armed robbery. They've pleaded not guilty to 12 charges, including conspiracy, coercion and assault with a deadly weapon.

Deliberations began 13 years to the day after Simpson was acquitted of killing his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ronald Goldman, in Los Angeles.

The Clark County jury heard 12 days of testimony, capped by prosecutors' arguments Thursday that the Las Vegas case had its roots in the 1994 slayings.

Prosecutor Chris Owens said Simpson planned — and Stewart helped carry out — a plot to retrieve personal items that Simpson lost after squirreling them away to avoid turning them over to Goldman's family to satisfy part of a $33.5 million civil wrongful death judgment levied in 1997 by a California court.

Owens told the jury to convict Simpson, denouncing him for "arrogance" of thinking he could commit a crime "against the dignity and the peace of the state of Nevada."

"The kind of arrogance ... that would make them think they could come in and get away with this kind of crime and that nobody would report it and they thought they could spin it that, 'It's all OK; It was my stuff.'"
Galanter told the jury the prosecution didn't prove Simpson was guilty in the criminal case that he said "has taken on a life of its own because of Mr. Simpson's involvement."

"Every cooperator, every person who had a gun, every person who had an ulterior motive, every person who signed a book deal, every person who got paid money — the police, the district attorney's office, is only interested in one thing: Mr. Simpson," Galanter said. "He has always been the target of this investigation, and nothing else mattered."


Galanter reminded the jury of a surreptitious recording of police investigators in the hotel room after the incident. "They're making jokes. They're saying things like, 'We're gonna get him,'" he said.

Since Sept. 15, the jury heard 22 often colorful witnesses — including seven of the nine people who were in the cramped hotel room. They've listened to numerous replays of secret recordings made before, during and after the alleged robbery.

Neither Simpson nor Stewart testified, and jurors were instructed not to consider that when judging the case. Two former co-defendants who said they brought guns did testify.

Judge Jackie Glass kept a tight rein on the proceedings and rejected several mistrial motions. She read 41 legal instructions to the jurors and six alternates before lawyers began closing arguments.

Galanter told the jury that the incident got out of hand because of former co-defendant Michael McClinton, who admitted displaying a gun during the confrontation.

"For whatever reason, Michael McClinton takes over," Galanter said, "and when McClinton takes over, he starts yelling and screaming and giving people orders and telling people to bag stuff up. And O.J.'s saying, 'Don't take anything that's not mine.'"
___ AP Special Correspondent Linda Deutsch contributed to this report
 

Boysboy

New Member
Messages
4,852
Reaction score
0
So it took the system THIRTEEN years to put this guy behind bars??:lmao2:
 

irvin88

Active Member
Messages
1,668
Reaction score
0
Where were all the OJ supporters outside the courthouse ??

Those people who cheered 13 years ago must be sooooo proud.:laugh2:
 

STAR GAZER

Benched
Messages
2,047
Reaction score
0
irvin88;2306618 said:
Where were all the OJ supporters outside the courthouse ??

Those people who cheered 13 years ago must be sooooo proud.:laugh2:

I was thinking the same thing when this all first came about. :D
 

xWraithx

Benched
Messages
3,449
Reaction score
1
irvin88;2306618 said:
Where were all the OJ supporters outside the courthouse ??

Those people who cheered 13 years ago must be sooooo proud.:laugh2:

what race were most of those people? I don't remember so could you please tell me?
 

Maikeru-sama

Mick Green 58
Messages
14,548
Reaction score
6
xWraithx;2306674 said:
what race were most of those people? I don't remember so could you please tell me?

What exactly is your point?

I can definately point to trials where the opposite was true.
 

Tenkamenin

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,605
Reaction score
4,026
irvin88;2306618 said:
Where were all the OJ supporters outside the courthouse ??

Those people who cheered 13 years ago must be sooooo proud.:laugh2:

Do you think the people who were backing him 13 years ago were backing him during this trial?
 

sacase

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,347
Reaction score
2,612
He won't be in jal for a while still, to much stupid crap happend in this trial for it not to go to an immediate appeal. The OJ saga is still not done.
 

jimmy40

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,866
Reaction score
1,888
sacase;2307107 said:
He won't be in jal for a while still, to much stupid crap happend in this trial for it not to go to an immediate appeal. The OJ saga is still not done.
He went straight to jail, didn't pass go or anything. The judge denied letting him out while waiting on sentencing. His *** is locked up.
 

kmp77

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,309
Reaction score
396
I wonder if he'll finally admit to the murder if he gets life this time.
 

Juke99

...Abbey someone
Messages
22,279
Reaction score
126
But who is going to be looking for his wife's killer on golf courses throughout the USA now??? :eek:
 

slomoxn

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,850
Reaction score
1,051
well is anybody going to start looking for Baretta's wife's killer too?
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,936
Reaction score
112,995
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
slomoxn;2307679 said:
well is anybody going to start looking for Baretta's wife's killer too?
:welcome: to the CowboysZone!!!!!

BTW his name is Robert Blake. ;)
 

Juke99

...Abbey someone
Messages
22,279
Reaction score
126
slomoxn;2307679 said:
well is anybody going to start looking for Baretta's wife's killer too?

Welcome.

And that has exactly what to do with this? I'm sorry. Should I have listed everyone for the past 100 years who got away with murder?

If the thread was about Robert Blake, the comment would have been about Robert Blake.
 

slomoxn

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,850
Reaction score
1,051
Thanks for the welcome. I've been reading posts on here for over a year now and never have posted but the O.J. thing irks me sometimes. The reason I asked about Robert Blake's wife ( I knew that) was in direct response of what race were the people supporting O.J.. I didn't follow the case but the tv representation of people supporting him was pretty diverse, not all black, white or anything else. So I ask if he was convicted of robbbery what does that have to do with killin his wife. We all know he got away with one just like 100's of others but more people seem to be concerned about him... why??? I think he sould have been convicted then just like R.B. but he wasn't, the only thing is he is to stupid to stay out of public scrutiny by showing his face everywhere unlike R.B. or any others tried for murder and got away. But still what does it matter who supported him and this case. They were the same people supporting R.B. during his trial...Americans. Also even though I live in Vegas I didn't follow this case either.
 
Top