AustnIsMySaviour;3287383 said:it would be an improvement but barely, guys so overrated
burmafrd;3287372 said:Yeah well OJ Simpson and Mike Garrett both went to USC. Did not make Reggie Bush an All Pro RB has it?
I have my doubts we would get much of an improvement of Rolle over Hamlin.
This is entirely different.burmafrd;3287372 said:Yeah well OJ Simpson and Mike Garrett both went to USC. Did not make Reggie Bush an All Pro RB has it?
I have my doubts we would get much of an improvement of Rolle over Hamlin.
Rampage;3287442 said:I think he's more of a liability than a "playmaker". he feasts on bad teams with bad qbs.
theogt;3287363 said:Posted in another thread:
Per Profootballfocus.com (over the 2008 and 2009 seasons):
Rolle - 72 Targets, 686 yards given up, 5 TDs given up, 3 PDs
Hamlin - 41 Targets, 335 yards given up, 4 TDs given up, 3 PDs
Addtionally:
INTs per game played (career):
Hamlin - .146
Rolle - .176
Single season high INTs
Hamlin - 5
Rolle - 5
Very clearly, he's the savior of the defense, because he had 4 INTs in 2009.
casmith07;3287649 said:This is why I'd rather draft a safety. Fans hate on Ken Hamlin entirely too much.
CATCH17;3287674 said:As they should for what he is paid.