Ok so how confident is everyone that we are beating the Skins Sunday night?

Beast_from_East

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,150
Reaction score
27,236
If I am Jerry, I tell Wade that if he loses this game to not even bother getting on the charter back to Dallas.

Seriously, we should smoke these scrubs.
 

30yrheel

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,076
Reaction score
362
i'm not confident at all. we almost always split with those chumps.
 

EPL0c0

The Funcooker
Messages
8,057
Reaction score
3,813
You can never assume anything based on records or previous week results, etc. when it comes to this rivalry. They play us hard every time and I'm sure they'd love nothing better than to ruin Dallas' playoff hopes.
 
Messages
860
Reaction score
0
I'm pretty sure we will beat them. Once we do beast them maybe our good friend MEAST or I should I say YEASTINFECTION 21 will go away? I'm glad that in "DC" we annoy Commanders fans. Especially this new idiot that wants to post here.
 

Eddie

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,092
Reaction score
5,862
I'm 50%. The Skins are going to throw the kitchen sink at us. We're their Super Bowl. Beating us will make their season.

We haven't swept them since ... when?
 

BoysFanInAustin

Active Member
Messages
380
Reaction score
141
Eddie;3171399 said:
I'm 50%. The Skins are going to throw the kitchen sink at us. We're their Super Bowl. Beating us will make their season.

We haven't swept them since ... when?

2004.
 

Cover 2

Pessimists Unite!!!
Messages
3,496
Reaction score
452
Biggems;3168806 said:
If I were a gambler, I would have bet a pretty penny on Dallas beating the Saints. I knew we would beat the Saints

I wouldn't touch the Skins game with Monopoly money. This week is my turn to be a doubting Thomas.

We played so well last week. The Skins played so bad. The game in D.C. The Skins suck and we are potentially playoff bound. I am just having a very ugly feeling about this game. This rivalry is just too unpredictable to even prognosticate an outcome. We are the far better team, and yet we only beat them 7-6 in our house...cause their kicker, now our kicker, miss 2 FGs in the contest.

The only saving grace for me is that the game in on SNF, instead of Fox, where Buck tends to bring a heavy dose of negative karma our way.

I think Dallas will win, but it will not be a dominating performance on the scoreboard. In fact, it might end up 13-10 or something like that.
I have my doubts too, but this is the Cowboys chance to show they are a new team. They need to come in as focused as they were for the Saints game. This is a rivalry game though, so anything can happen. I hope to see a hungry and focused Cowboys team though. I want them to put the December talk to rest with a win this week and next.
 

wconn1979

Active Member
Messages
761
Reaction score
237
Dallas 42 Skins 13

Romo 32-40 427 yards 4 TD's
2 to miles 1 to witten, 1 to RW.
2 rushing TD's

:p

Thats my prediction
 

The Emperor

Marcus Aurelius Maximus
Messages
3,881
Reaction score
2
CalCBFan;3169127 said:
Well stated. I think we have to come out and play as we did against the Saints (and even eliminate some of the mistakes we made against them) to win and then again do it to Philly the following week. This team has a history of laying down after a big win which they have to overcome, especially when their next opponent plays poorly the week before. IMHO the 'Skins were looking ahead to we!

I was disturbed to see Wade doing the Jimmy Johnson impersonation in the locker room after beating the Saints. He needs to remember that when Jimmy said "How 'bout them Cowboys!" he had just won the SB and almost set a scoring record in the process. Just playing spoiler to Peyton and the Saints isn't much of a thrill for me, and if that is the highlight of Wade's season, it explains why he's never won a PO game and will be looking for work next month.

But I would like nothing better than to see the Cowboys "keep it going" and this Sunday in DC is a good place to start...

You fail at history and the present.

Firstly, Jimmy Johnson said that after the 1992 NFC Championship game.

Secondly, Wade Phillips said, "We just got to continue that the rest of the way now. All right? That's only a step forward. It's only a step forward."

Thirdly, I seriously doubt you know anything about Wade Phillips other than what the mediots have cued for you.
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
37,847
Reaction score
16,869
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
If the Cowboys lose to the Commanders, they deserve NOTHING! Not even a sneak into the wildcard spot.

With that said, the Cowboys will WIN THIS GAME.


:star:
 

CalCBFan

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,277
Reaction score
31
The Emperor;3171558 said:
You fail at history and the present.

Firstly, Jimmy Johnson said that after the 1992 NFC Championship game.

Secondly, Wade Phillips said, "We just got to continue that the rest of the way now. All right? That's only a step forward. It's only a step forward."

Thirdly, I seriously doubt you know anything about Wade Phillips other than what the mediots have cued for you.
I stand corrected about the Championship/SB mistake!

But media or not, the fact is that Wade hasn't won a PO game and that this team does tend to laydown after a big win, especially when their opponent has done a poor job the week before.

If you are a member of Wade's or Jerry's family I'm sure you have access to more info about Wade than I do. I do have to go by what I read and hear from the media. I would think that if we could only post about what we ourselves have heard w/ our own ears, or seen w/ our own eyes, or been in the locker room ourselves or at practice ourselves, this forum (of opinions) would not exist, even though there would still be opinions about what was meant by what was seen, heard, etc.

Merry Christmas !...
 

The Emperor

Marcus Aurelius Maximus
Messages
3,881
Reaction score
2
CalCBFan;3171609 said:
I stand corrected about the Championship/SB mistake!

But media or not, the fact is that Wade hasn't won a PO game and that this team does tend to laydown after a big win, especially when their opponent has done a poor job the week before.

If you are a member of Wade's or Jerry's family I'm sure you have access to more info about Wade than I do. I do have to go by what I read and hear from the media. I would think that if we could only post about what we ourselves have heard w/ our own ears, or seen w/ our own eyes, or been in the locker room ourselves or at practice ourselves, this forum (of opinions) would not exist, even though there would still be opinions about what was meant by what was seen, heard, etc.

Merry Christmas !...

Let's start off with the final paragraph. It is true that we have to go off what the mediots tell us, BUT WE CAN'T RELY ON WHAT THEY TELL US. What do I mean by that? Well, I've done research on Wade Phillips' tenure and elsewhere to figure out WHY he's had a very good regular season winning percentage but has sucked in the playoffs. To put it succinctly, he's been on teams in decline. The Dallas Cowboys are the only team that he's been on that has been on an upward tick. Okay, so these aren't the 1998 Buffalo Bills out there or something. This is the best chance Wade Phillips' got.

This team is no different than any other team. We beat the Chiefs in dramatic fashion and then came out to beat the Falcons, and then dispatched the Seahawks the next week. Weren't the Chiefs (only because of the way we toyed with them) and Falcons big games?

What about in 2008 when we beat the Eagles to turn around to go to Lambeau for our first win there in our team's history? What about when we beat the Commanders and then came home and took care of the 49ers?

What about in 2007 when we beat the Giants and then went to play the Dolphins? What about when we beat the Eagles, Giants, and Commanders in succession and then came home to play the Jets? What about when we beat the Packers and then beat the Lions?

I don't agree with you that this team lays down after big games. Even if this should be so, it's no different than any other team. We just have to overcome it.

EDIT: Merry Christmas to you as well. I'm sorry for being curt.
 

LandryFan

Proud Native Texan, USMC-1972-79, USN-1983-2000
Messages
7,400
Reaction score
6,347
yimyammer;3169310 said:
I hear ya, each week just gets tougher and tougher, they have absolutely no margin for error the rest of the way
I agree with you and I think that plays right into the Cowboys' hands. I think the players look at this game as a "must win" game, as they well should. Lose either of these next two, and chances of getting into the playoffs and having any playoff success, even if they somehow make it in, are next to none. If they can go into the playoffs as Division Champs on a three game winning streak against tough competition, I really like their chances once they get there. This team is not psychologically built to "limp" into the playoffs and do well (a la Arizona last year), IMO.
 

BourbonBalz

Star4Ever
Messages
12,207
Reaction score
8,178
I am highly confident we beat the Foreskins. Even though it's a "rivalry game", I think we're highly motivated and the Skins have packed it in. Could they get it together and play their best game? Sure, guess so, but I don't see it happening. Let's put it this way. If we can't beat a terrible Foreskin team with the playoffs on the line, we don't need to go to the playoffs anyway. It's really that simple.
 

Cover 2

Pessimists Unite!!!
Messages
3,496
Reaction score
452
The Emperor;3171772 said:
Let's start off with the final paragraph. It is true that we have to go off what the mediots tell us, BUT WE CAN'T RELY ON WHAT THEY TELL US. What do I mean by that? Well, I've done research on Wade Phillips' tenure and elsewhere to figure out WHY he's had a very good regular season winning percentage but has sucked in the playoffs. To put it succinctly, he's been on teams in decline. The Dallas Cowboys are the only team that he's been on that has been on an upward tick. Okay, so these aren't the 1998 Buffalo Bills out there or something. This is the best chance Wade Phillips' got.

This team is no different than any other team. We beat the Chiefs in dramatic fashion and then came out to beat the Falcons, and then dispatched the Seahawks the next week. Weren't the Chiefs (only because of the way we toyed with them) and Falcons big games?

What about in 2008 when we beat the Eagles to turn around to go to Lambeau for our first win there in our team's history? What about when we beat the Commanders and then came home and took care of the 49ers?

What about in 2007 when we beat the Giants and then went to play the Dolphins? What about when we beat the Eagles, Giants, and Commanders in succession and then came home to play the Jets? What about when we beat the Packers and then beat the Lions?

I don't agree with you that this team lays down after big games. Even if this should be so, it's no different than any other team. We just have to overcome it.

EDIT: Merry Christmas to you as well. I'm sorry for being curt.
You can make the case that Wade put those teams in decline, just like Switzer helped put our team in decline by creating a poor football atmosphere. I like Wade as a person and a D coordinator, but I'm just not convinced he has what it takes to be a successful head coach.

Hopefully he proves me wrong and wins a Super Bowl this year.
 

Section446

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,941
Reaction score
11,619
Not very, we're the type of team that can beat any team in the NFL and then come out the next week and lose to the worst of the worst. We're still too inconsistent this year and tend to play down to the level of our competition.
 

Deep_South

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,030
Reaction score
3,653
Any way you look at it, if we can't go out on the field Sunday night and put some distance between us and a 4-10 team then it probably isn't our time to be thinking about the Super Bowl.

However, I think it is our time, and the Skins are in for another several year stretch of losing to the Cowboys over and over again.
 

RonMexicosRevenge

New Member
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
As a Skins fan, and a realist, I don't see how Washington wins this. Their performance Monday night was God-awful and I just don't see how they will stand a chance Sunday. I will be SHOCKED if it's even close...
 

The Emperor

Marcus Aurelius Maximus
Messages
3,881
Reaction score
2
Cover 2;3171929 said:
You can make the case that Wade put those teams in decline, just like Switzer helped put our team in decline by creating a poor football atmosphere. I like Wade as a person and a D coordinator, but I'm just not convinced he has what it takes to be a successful head coach.

Hopefully he proves me wrong and wins a Super Bowl this year.

It's a bad case. I'll tell you why.

Look at the coaches that Wade Phillips was brought in to replace and when he was brought in to replace them. In Denver, he was brought in to replace the great Dan Reeves when Reeves' Broncos were in a state of decline. Yeah, they had John Elway, Steve Atwater, and Shannon Sharpe, but the other necessary components on the team, such as runningback and wide receiver, were not in place or were never in place.

Take Mark Jackson, Elway's main target during the '80s. Once Dan Reeves left for the Giants in '93, so did Jackson. Wade didn't get to benefit from the Elway-Jackson tandem like the Reeves' Broncos did. Furthermore, the runningback situation in Denver was never solidified until Terrell Davis came into town.

Which leads me to my next point: things changed dramatically in Denver in 1995. Yeah, that was the year Mike Shanahan was hired, but it was also the year Rod Smith started coming into his own and Terrell Davis joined the team. The latter player really helped turn the fortunes of the Broncos because it took the heat off Elway. And, honestly, once Davis was injured in 1999, Shanahan and the Broncos couldn't do anything after that. Yeah, they made the playoffs in 2000 and later won a playoff game in 2005 after qualifying the previous two years and getting beat by the Colts in the wild card round each year, but the Broncos were never the same once Terrell Davis retired.

Wade Phillips didn't have the benefits of him. Things would have been a lot different for Wade if he had a real runningback.

I have a professor at college here that is a big Stancos fan. I mean, this guy goes back to the Orange Crush days. I talked to him about Wade Phillips and Mike Shanahan and he said that management in Denver wanted Mike Shanahan immediately after they fired Reeves in 1992. Shanahan wouldn't take the job because he didn't want to follow a legend like Reeves. That also sheds some light as to why Wade had a short tenure in Denver. Maybe they never wanted to keep him long term as it was, thus he was walking into a lose-lose situation the whole time, much like when Dave Campo took the head coaching job for our Cowboys.

Denver was a team with peaks and valleys and they hired Wade during one of the valleys. The Buffalo Bills were a team on a straight decline. After failing to qualify for the playoffs in 1994, the Bills could not advance past the divisional round of the playoffs and their last postseason appearance was in 1996, and Marv Levy's last season was a 6-10 swan song in 1997.

When Wade Phillips took over the team, the only legends from the Super Bowl Bills were Andre Reed, Thurman Thomas, and Bruce Smith. The only guy that wasn't getting supplanted by younger talent was Bruce Smith. And the younger talent obviously wasn't going to get it done. Wade could only work with what he was given.

Sounds like a cop out? I don't believe it is. Bill Polian, the mastermind general manager behind those Super Bowl Bills, left Buffalo in 1993 and was replaced by John Butler. From 1993 to 2000, John Butler had mediocre drafts, drafts that weren't good enough to continue the winning traditions of the Bills. Think about it. Instead of getting their own quarterback through the draft like they did with Jim Kelly, once Levy was gone, they traded for Jacksonville's Rob Johnson and signed Doug Flutie. Evidences of the Bills' reliance on free agent talent as opposed to homegrown talent can be seen in 1995 when they signed Bryce Paup.

Wade Phillips went out with John Butler once the 2000 season was over. Wade Phillips was part of a wholesale house cleaning. And, as I examine this, he did a good job with the talent he was afforded. And it's not like the Bills have done better since Wade Phillips. In fact, they've gone through three head coaches and three general managers since then.

The best chance for Wade Phillips to succeed is here in Dallas. This is the best talented team he's had, ever. It's Week 16. We're 9-5, destiny in our hands, coming off of a huge win over the undefeated Saints IN DECEMBER IN THE SUPERDOME, and we're not injury-riddled like we were in 2008. I really have a good feeling about this team and that Wade Phillips will get a playoff win this postseason.

I'm willing to continue to back Wade because that's the right thing to do at this particular time.
 
Top