McLovin;3253895 said:2007 ??
McLovin;3253895 said:2007 ??
LilTexan;3253883 said:Home field advantage doesn't always seal the deal, but it certainly friggin helps.
Woods;3253901 said:Honestly said, if the Vikings didn't shoot themselves in the foot with 5 turnovers, they would have won this game.
That said, I'm glad they lost!
Now, that would be a dream come true.Yeagermeister;3253905 said:That would be sweet. All home games in the playoffs and SB.
RCowboyFan;3253897 said:Depends on who has Home field advantage. Dome teams like Saints or Vikings, have a huge advantage. On other hand, if it is normal open air stadium, that advantage is not as huge.
Either way, Home field is always a great advantage.
dadymat;3253911 said:well if they are gonna have a qb and a rb who are turnover prone its bound to happen
AdamJT13;3253917 said:There's some research that supports the idea that having home field in an open-air stadium in cold weather during the playoffs is a HUGE advantage against a warm-weather team. For example, if the Steelers were facing the Chargers in the AFC title game and it was 30 degrees, the Steelers would be very likely to win.
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/blog/?p=456
"In the thirteen conference championship games where the home team's venue is more than 35 degrees colder than the visitor's, the average result has been 29.5 points for the home team, only 9.9 points for the visitor, for an average margin of victory of +19.6 for the home team."
Doomsday;3253941 said:Its going to be pretty difficult to get the #1 seed with the schedule Dallas is giong to have next season. If they do they should be ready for just about anything.
McLovin;3254355 said:Sure, everyone would love to have HFA , but you still have to be ready to play.
And to get HFA you can't have many games you don't show up for.
Looking at the first Giant game and the Denver game, either one of those would have given us 1 home game.