playmakers
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,238
- Reaction score
- 154
Thinking about the saftey thread it came to my attention (and see if you guys agree or not) that safties arent that important as compared to other postions. Let me explain
Remember, back in the day, no team would ever take a saftey until minmum the second round. I beileve Ronnie Lott was the previous highest drafted saftey. Then guys came along such as Roy Williams, Ed Reed, Troy Palumba[sp], Bob Sanders and now teams have taken these players high. Well, IMO the orginal theory about safties is holding up. Ed Reed and Roy Williams have had their share of time dominating a few games in their careers but let me ask you this is any saftey worth a 1st round grade anymore? I love Roy as a player but if anyone says Roy Williams does is a homer. Nice player, but makes too many mental errors. Hes a playmaker both postivly and negativly. Ed Reed had his time of Mr Invincible recently but minus a speacil teams play what has he done in the last year or so. No 1st round grade there either. Same could be said about Polomuba. Does Sean Taylor dominate a game? How about Donte Whitner and Micheal Huff? Bob Sanders seems to be the guy of the moment but it wont be for long. Were see about Laron Landry too. If there was a guy to consider the only one I can think of is Adrian Wilson from the Cards. You cant argue with near 100 tackles, 8 sacks and 7 ints.(Dont quote the stats)
If I were a GM I wouldnt touch a saftey in the top 20 of the draft. I guess you can say I think the poistion is slightly overrated. Look at Adrian Wilson from Arizona is a prime example. What do you think? Do you think like me that teams overvalue where to pick a saftey at. Or, do you think theres value at taking a saftey in the top 10.
Lastly, this isnt a Roy Williams dislike thread. Im talking about safties in general and how I think teams over value them.
Remember, back in the day, no team would ever take a saftey until minmum the second round. I beileve Ronnie Lott was the previous highest drafted saftey. Then guys came along such as Roy Williams, Ed Reed, Troy Palumba[sp], Bob Sanders and now teams have taken these players high. Well, IMO the orginal theory about safties is holding up. Ed Reed and Roy Williams have had their share of time dominating a few games in their careers but let me ask you this is any saftey worth a 1st round grade anymore? I love Roy as a player but if anyone says Roy Williams does is a homer. Nice player, but makes too many mental errors. Hes a playmaker both postivly and negativly. Ed Reed had his time of Mr Invincible recently but minus a speacil teams play what has he done in the last year or so. No 1st round grade there either. Same could be said about Polomuba. Does Sean Taylor dominate a game? How about Donte Whitner and Micheal Huff? Bob Sanders seems to be the guy of the moment but it wont be for long. Were see about Laron Landry too. If there was a guy to consider the only one I can think of is Adrian Wilson from the Cards. You cant argue with near 100 tackles, 8 sacks and 7 ints.(Dont quote the stats)
If I were a GM I wouldnt touch a saftey in the top 20 of the draft. I guess you can say I think the poistion is slightly overrated. Look at Adrian Wilson from Arizona is a prime example. What do you think? Do you think like me that teams overvalue where to pick a saftey at. Or, do you think theres value at taking a saftey in the top 10.
Lastly, this isnt a Roy Williams dislike thread. Im talking about safties in general and how I think teams over value them.