Opinion: The Randle experiment is over

what are talking about,randle was outstanding today.the blocking abysmal to say the least and he still made something out of nothing.

I didn't say he was bad, but he's not a #1 back, I'm sorry. He's Hambrick. Nothing wrong with that, but we need a lead dog fast.
 
Uhh, I'm not a big fan of him but he played well in both games this year.

Edit: Im all for CMike to get touches, but Randle is our best running back.
 
McFadden looked slow today

no he looked tentative, almost deer in the headlights. Philly has a stout Run defense the team did rush for 100 yards. That all pro backfield across the field didn't reach positive yardage until the end of the game.
 
I think Randle looked better today, but IMO he still looks like a good third down back that is OK as a starting RB. He isn't a bellcow type though, I thought DMC looked better than him in the second half. Randle will still start but going forward I think more carries will go to DMC and Michael than today's game.
 
I didn't say he was bad, but he's not a #1 back, I'm sorry. He's Hambrick. Nothing wrong with that, but we need a lead dog fast.

i would like to C-Mike too but it is really hard to keep 4 RBs active.
 
Time to see what CMike can do and more of McFadden. I've seen enough and we need to lean on the running game bigtime!

Randle isn't awful, he is just not a lead back. He's a complimentary back only.

Sorry, but Randle was not the problem.

Randle made some terrific gains out of nothing. The blocking was not good on many plays and without Dez they have and extra defender to put in the box against the run. Then when Weeden was the QB it was obvious when it was going to be a run.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,693
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top